spec 911 rules question
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Apologies if this has been discussed before:
Why doesn't spec911 just use a power to weight ratio requirement instead of the 2300/2350/2400 pound restriction based on motor type? That seems like the easiest way to truly keep costs more contained.
Why doesn't spec911 just use a power to weight ratio requirement instead of the 2300/2350/2400 pound restriction based on motor type? That seems like the easiest way to truly keep costs more contained.
#2
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
keith, when you visit your turbo next time, just ask rich. he created the rules, i am sure he has his thoughts.
dont tell me you are getting one :-)
dont tell me you are getting one :-)
#3
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wouldn't power to weight require dyno measurements? We want to drive, not mess with dynos...
Something to consider.
Something to consider.
#4
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Rich has told me multiple times it's to eliminate the dyno. That's why the rules for GTL are even easier - all compliance to the rules can be checked visually, with a measuring device/caliper and a scale.
How does switching from a fixed weight and motor combo to a power to weight system contain cost?
How does switching from a fixed weight and motor combo to a power to weight system contain cost?