Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

944 Cup Car rear ride height question/problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2009, 12:40 AM
  #1  
johntorg
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
johntorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 944 Cup Car rear ride height question/problem

I just removed my 30 MM torsion bars and replaced them with bilstein coilovers with 550lb 8 inch springs. I did this to gain adjustability (also to lower the rear ride height) without reindexing the torsion bars.

To my suprise the car still sits at the same or a slightly higher rear ride height, even with the eccentrics almost maxed out and the coilovers in the lowest position.

One thing I did notice is that the springs are under tension, even in the lowest setting on the lower spring perch.

Is this normal? I could go to 7 inch springs, which would definitely lower the car, but I am worried about the springs bottoming out.

I would appreciate any input, particularly from 944 racers using coilovers in the rear. Input on front and rear ride height (and how it was measured) for a 944 race car would also be interesting.
Old 09-12-2009, 12:57 AM
  #2  
johntorg
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
johntorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The shocks are the same as these, currently for sale on ebay. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/*-2-P...QQcmdZViewItem

The springs also look like they are under tension with the perch almost completely lowered.
Old 09-12-2009, 11:24 AM
  #3  
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Larry Herman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

We run 7" springs with 650 lb springs in our 951. It sits exactly right for what we wanted. I can take pics later if you need them.
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car

CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.

Old 09-12-2009, 04:03 PM
  #4  
North Coast Cab
Burning Brakes
 
North Coast Cab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I run 6" x 2.25" springs on my rear.
Old 09-12-2009, 04:46 PM
  #5  
johntorg
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
johntorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, I really appreciate the answers. I will go to smaller springs. BTW the problem is that my new car has aluminum rear control arms and the old one had steel, which locates the bottom of the shock considerably lower. The lowermount also looks a lot stronger on the steel arms.
Old 09-12-2009, 06:49 PM
  #6  
smlporsche
Drifting
 
smlporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA & NC
Posts: 3,082
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I'm running 8" (600#) springs with my Leda's and have no problem setting my car at the height I want. It sounds like it may be your control arms...
Old 09-13-2009, 08:36 AM
  #7  
johntorg
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
johntorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Spent some time at Roebling yesterday measuring ride height on 4 or 5 944s. I will go with smaller springs and look for 23.5 inches rear ride height with 225/45/15 Hoosiers. Any opinions on 6" vs 7" springs. I will go with 700lb springs and was wondering if I could bottom out the 6" springs.
Old 09-13-2009, 04:46 PM
  #8  
spoolin51
Three Wheelin'
 
spoolin51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dallas / Chicago
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am having a similiar yet different problem. We just deleted the torsion bars and have 800# springs in the rear. WHen we lowered the car to the ground, the rear end was basically sitting on the tires. Something is definitely not right.
Any input greatly appreciated.
Old 09-13-2009, 09:58 PM
  #9  
johntorg
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
johntorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is the length of your springs? Steel or aluminum control arms?. I suspect if you have short, 6 or 7 inch springs and steel control arms you would have this problem. Also where are the height eccentrics set?
Old 09-14-2009, 08:53 AM
  #10  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,008
Received 92 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johntorg
To my suprise the car still sits at the same or a slightly higher rear ride height, even with the eccentrics almost maxed out and the coilovers in the lowest position.
Originally Posted by johntorg
Also where are the height eccentrics set?
The height eccentrics have absolutely no effect once the torsion bars are removed. All they do is rotate the spring plate cap (which has the splines that engage one end of the torsion bar).

Your only ride height adjustment is the threaded collars on the shocks.

You need shorter springs.
Old 09-14-2009, 10:00 AM
  #11  
johntorg
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
johntorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, I hadn't thought of that. Anyone have 6 or 7 inch 2.5X600 to 700 lb springs?
Old 09-14-2009, 10:11 AM
  #12  
johntorg
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
johntorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just wanted to check my calculation for various front to rear spring ratios before I buy my new rear springs. I divided the front spring rate by .65 to get the following results:

Front Rear
450 692
500 769
550 846

Given what's available that would corrspond to 700, 750 and 850lb springs
Old 09-14-2009, 11:13 AM
  #13  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,008
Received 92 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Your division is accurate, but the pairing is more dependent on car weight, driver preference, etc. Are you looking to have the same wheel rate as your 30mm torsion bars yielded? Were they solid or hollow?
Old 09-14-2009, 11:26 AM
  #14  
johntorg
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
johntorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Car weight is 2800 minimum, since its a 2.7L. I found the car was too soft in the rear with the 30MM T-bars. I am really just looking for a starting point with equal effective rates front and rear. I will check today to see what my front spring rate is (bad memory), but its somewhere between 450 and 550. What is the effective rate of solid 30mm bars? I am not experienced enough to have a driver preference. Just trying for a good basic setup.
Old 09-14-2009, 11:34 AM
  #15  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,008
Received 92 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

A 30mm solid torsion bar will give you a wheel rate of about 329 lbs/in. An 825 lb spring will give you about 327 lbs/in. You'll find that people run a whole range of springs - it's hard to say that one setup is "better" than another. One of the best things to do is to get a few springs (they're not too much, and easy to change) and see what you like best.

FYI, a 550 lb spring in the rear will give you a wheel rate of about 218 lbs/in.

On my car, the front weighs about 250 lbs more than the rear - so I have to take that into account with spring calculations. If the car had a true 50-50% weight distribution, I'd have more weight on the rear and less on the front. So I'd then use less front spring and more rear spring.


Quick Reply: 944 Cup Car rear ride height question/problem



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:13 PM.