View Poll Results: Have sequential gearboxes had a positive or negative affect on racing?
Positive
13
72.22%
Negative
5
27.78%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll
Have sequentials gearboxes had a positive or negative impact on racing?
#1
User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sterling, MA
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have sequentials gearboxes had a positive or negative impact on racing?
I'm going to vote for negative.....
explanation post #7...
explanation post #7...
Last edited by MTosi; 05-05-2008 at 02:29 PM.
#5
Rennlist Member
I take it you're talking pro level? My God, does ANYONE need to deal with a Hewland, say in a Formula Ford, unless you're vintage racing it? I can deal with anything from a 910 (talk about sloppy shifting) to my sequential box. But if you're talking longevity and reliability, bring on all the tech that's somewhat affordable.
#7
User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sterling, MA
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How so?
I think the common misconception is that shifting isn't a big deal, and that it realy doesn't take that much skill to do. There is a big difference between going into a corner LFB with paddle shifts, than going in with a full manual......lfbing with paddle shift, release pressure on gas squeeze pressure on brakes and pull the little paddle a few times.......Full standard, dancing the car in the corner with one hand, while the other hand is working the shifter, right foot working the brake and matching while the left foot is working the clutch, it's almost a ballet in the car which all had to be perfectley cordinated. It also hurts a driver who is easy on the car, sequentials reward grenade drivers who are harsh on the car since it will obviously last longer. (of course at an amatuer level this is good, since they cut down on maintnance costs etc.) It takes alot of how easy a driver is on a car out of the equation as well, one of the reason's people like Jim Clark, Jackie Stewart, Fangio, and Ickx were so good is because they were fast.....but also very easy on the car, so it lasted and alot of that was their shifting.
A little Clark in car-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJDkZYhJR1E
I take it you're talking pro level? My God, does ANYONE need to deal with a Hewland, say in a Formula Ford, unless you're vintage racing it? I can deal with anything from a 910 (talk about sloppy shifting) to my sequential box. But if you're talking longevity and reliability, bring on all the tech that's somewhat affordable.
Trending Topics
#9
Drifting
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It sounds like your beef is with computer controls of transmissions and not with sequential transmissions.
Whether sequential or H-pattern, drivers don't need to heal/toe and double-clutch most race gearboxes. Both style gearboxes can be computer shifted or both can be "manually" shifted. Both can have computer controls of throttle cut for upshifts or throttle blips for downshifts. Neither really require that the clutch pedal be used to make an up or downshift.
Whether sequential or H-pattern, drivers don't need to heal/toe and double-clutch most race gearboxes. Both style gearboxes can be computer shifted or both can be "manually" shifted. Both can have computer controls of throttle cut for upshifts or throttle blips for downshifts. Neither really require that the clutch pedal be used to make an up or downshift.
#10
User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sterling, MA
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It sounds like your beef is with computer controls of transmissions and not with sequential transmissions.