So, is inside front wheel lift inherent to the 944/968 chassis?
#32
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm running t-bars only; car is 2640lbs, 660# front springs, 34mm hollow rear bars, 19mm rear Cup Car swaybar, 23mm stock front swaybar. This puts me at 561/553 = 1.0 per the rating scale.
Car is good, stick is excellent on corner exit, exhibits corner-entry understeer. It also lifts the inside front on corner exit - got pics to prove it. I plan to rebalance the car to improve things for this season, as it's 2% rear-heavy. I plan to reset it to level, try to get that to work, or progress from there.
Car is good, stick is excellent on corner exit, exhibits corner-entry understeer. It also lifts the inside front on corner exit - got pics to prove it. I plan to rebalance the car to improve things for this season, as it's 2% rear-heavy. I plan to reset it to level, try to get that to work, or progress from there.
#33
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The right side of Leftville
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Skip Wolfe
One other "rule of thumb" i have heard is to run around 1.5 times more wheel rate on the front than rear. I also Using the .42 multiplier for the rear and a .85 multiplier for the front (using some seat of the pants math and the equation in Van's link above) we have the following
Van - 500/700 = 1.45 - reported balanced
Larry's son - 400/550 = 1.47- reported balanced
mikew968 - 600/700 = 1.73 - reported understeer
Redlineman - 500/450 = 2.25 - occasional front wheel lift
Pretty small statistcal sample here. and I'm not sure it's definitive proof of anything, but it's a start. The one big question mark is the front wheel rate multiplier - I used D1 = 13", D2 = 16", and a spring angle of 80 degrees.
Van - 500/700 = 1.45 - reported balanced
Larry's son - 400/550 = 1.47- reported balanced
mikew968 - 600/700 = 1.73 - reported understeer
Redlineman - 500/450 = 2.25 - occasional front wheel lift
Pretty small statistcal sample here. and I'm not sure it's definitive proof of anything, but it's a start. The one big question mark is the front wheel rate multiplier - I used D1 = 13", D2 = 16", and a spring angle of 80 degrees.
Based on what I'm reading here, my next step should be to decrease the front rate to 600# and see what happens. Thoughts?
(GREAT thread!)
#34
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dave,
I get slight lift with the front wheels when it's a tight turn and the opposite is extremely weighted. An example is turn 9, left off camber, at the Glen. Most photo's show my inside front lifting.
I belive my springs are 600 all around, Koni coilovers w/o torsion bars.
I get slight lift with the front wheels when it's a tight turn and the opposite is extremely weighted. An example is turn 9, left off camber, at the Glen. Most photo's show my inside front lifting.
I belive my springs are 600 all around, Koni coilovers w/o torsion bars.
#35
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well...i might be more confused at this point!!! I will stiffen rear sway bar and see how things go and then if necesary go to 800 rears. I think style is a big factor here as well.
Mike
Mike
#36
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What I would really like to see is effective motion ratio's for the swaybars as well... that would help show the whole picture and allow us to equate say the 968 m030 to the weltmeister and get a feel for whats really going on.
Does anybody have that information? It's not really accurate to say a ratio of 1.1 understeers, but 1.5 works great without knowing the swaybars involved.
The general rule that I follow is to run ~20% softer in the rear and balance out the associated tendancy to understeer with a stiffer rear swaybar. The rule is really to go for 90% of your chassis frequency at the rear as compared to the front...for our car and ~500# springs it works out to 20% softer in the rear. Or a ratio of 1.2 to follow the above methodology.
The softer rear spring rate helps the rear put the power down on corner exit...which is obviously very important. The stiffer rear swaybar means that it is more sensitive to changes in drop link length, giving you a lot of control over the handling characteristics of the car with a quick adjustment. Swaybars and springrates is obviously only one aspect of your setup...damping and aero can help to fine tune the car.
Lifting a front wheel seems like a result of a relatively stiffer rear in roll as compared to the front. Softening the front will help keep the tire on the ground because now the wheel will be able to droop further (because it was able to compress the softer spring more in the first place when you put the car on the ground statically). Stiffening the rear will obviously help keep the front from lifting as much in the first place.
Hope that all made some sense...and was somewhat usefull.
Does anybody have that information? It's not really accurate to say a ratio of 1.1 understeers, but 1.5 works great without knowing the swaybars involved.
The general rule that I follow is to run ~20% softer in the rear and balance out the associated tendancy to understeer with a stiffer rear swaybar. The rule is really to go for 90% of your chassis frequency at the rear as compared to the front...for our car and ~500# springs it works out to 20% softer in the rear. Or a ratio of 1.2 to follow the above methodology.
The softer rear spring rate helps the rear put the power down on corner exit...which is obviously very important. The stiffer rear swaybar means that it is more sensitive to changes in drop link length, giving you a lot of control over the handling characteristics of the car with a quick adjustment. Swaybars and springrates is obviously only one aspect of your setup...damping and aero can help to fine tune the car.
Lifting a front wheel seems like a result of a relatively stiffer rear in roll as compared to the front. Softening the front will help keep the tire on the ground because now the wheel will be able to droop further (because it was able to compress the softer spring more in the first place when you put the car on the ground statically). Stiffening the rear will obviously help keep the front from lifting as much in the first place.
Hope that all made some sense...and was somewhat usefull.
#37
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm surprised that nobody had mentioned the sway bars. The way a sway bar works is to transfer spring force from one side of the car to act in the opposite direction on the other. So if you turn left, the sway bar transfers spring force to the right side of the car (the outside) by transfering that amount from the left side (the inside). If the bar is very stiff, the spring force on the inside wheel goes close to zero or even negative.
I'll bet the problem is too stiff sway bar. Many of the 944 bars I have seen are very stiff. You have two choices to limit body roll: stiff springs and soft bar(ideal) or soft springs and stiff bar (less than ideal).
Make sure your springs are about the same as the rear rate and use a softer sway bar. I use the Kokeln on full soft and it works well (although it's far too heavy).
timo
I'll bet the problem is too stiff sway bar. Many of the 944 bars I have seen are very stiff. You have two choices to limit body roll: stiff springs and soft bar(ideal) or soft springs and stiff bar (less than ideal).
Make sure your springs are about the same as the rear rate and use a softer sway bar. I use the Kokeln on full soft and it works well (although it's far too heavy).
timo
#38
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by adrial
Lifting a front wheel seems like a result of a relatively stiffer rear in roll as compared to the front. Softening the front will help keep the tire on the ground because now the wheel will be able to droop further (because it was able to compress the softer spring more in the first place when you put the car on the ground statically). Stiffening the rear will obviously help keep the front from lifting as much in the first place.
Hope that all made some sense...and was somewhat usefull.
Hope that all made some sense...and was somewhat usefull.
When I was setting up my Carrera, I ran 23 mm front T-bars and 28 mm rear with 225s & 245s. It was a good setup, but when I changed to 245s & 275s the car developed understeer when I picked up the throttle going through slower turns. Part of the problem was the additional grip of the rear tires, and the fact that the car was cornering a little harder. To counter that we went to 30mm rear T-bars and tightened up on the front sway bar. Viola, the balance was back. The stiffer rear t-bars kept the car from sitting down under acceleration, and the balance was restored with the front bar. As a side note, the car did not want to lift the front wheel as easily as it used to.
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car
CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car
CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.
#39
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Can someone double check my D1 (centerline of the control arm chassis pivot point to the ball joint), D2 (centerline of the control arm chassis pivot point to the hub face), and spring angle values - those were estimates from memory and somewhat suspect.
As far as the sway bars, I guess my take is that the overall balance should be set by the spring rates and then fine tuned with the sway bars. Consequently, with front and rear adjustable bars it really doesn't factor into the equation. However, with the 30mm M030 bars your are stuck with the one setting so at that point it does become a bigger factor.
As far as the sway bars, I guess my take is that the overall balance should be set by the spring rates and then fine tuned with the sway bars. Consequently, with front and rear adjustable bars it really doesn't factor into the equation. However, with the 30mm M030 bars your are stuck with the one setting so at that point it does become a bigger factor.
#40
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by timo944
Make sure your springs are about the same as the rear rate and use a softer sway bar. I use the Kokeln on full soft and it works well (although it's far too heavy).
timo
timo
Does anyone have pictures, or experience with open wheel cars? I've seen a few at races and car shows, and always marvled at seemingly small sway bars. Are they really small (in comparison with our street cars?) Or is it just an issue of low vehicle weight and a low center of gravity?
I assume there are formulas out there for sway bar calculations -- I'll see if I can find some.
#41
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This is a very interesting read. However, I caution those who are thinking about changing their suspension based on well they think somone else's set up works. The suspension set up should be looked at as a package for a specific driving style. It is shock valving or adjustbility, springs or t/b rate, sways, tires (size/type), and driving style or ability.
AFAIK, I have never experience wheel lift on my stock S2 and run 25lbs lighter springs on the rear on Bilstein w/ virtually 0 rate t/b, 16" rims and 3250 with me in the car. Same set up gives me a very noticable corner entry understeer with 225 F/ 265 R tires compared with almost no understeer to a little tendency for mid-corner oversteer with 255 on all 4. Adding a stock LSD made the car understeer with 255 on all 4. BTW, I am probably a mid pack driver.
AFAIK, I have never experience wheel lift on my stock S2 and run 25lbs lighter springs on the rear on Bilstein w/ virtually 0 rate t/b, 16" rims and 3250 with me in the car. Same set up gives me a very noticable corner entry understeer with 225 F/ 265 R tires compared with almost no understeer to a little tendency for mid-corner oversteer with 255 on all 4. Adding a stock LSD made the car understeer with 255 on all 4. BTW, I am probably a mid pack driver.
#42
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Van
I too, use Kokeln sway bars. My front has the NASCAR splines on the ends -- and, in fact, I've gone with a lighter, softer bar than originally shipped by Kokeln.
Does anyone have pictures, or experience with open wheel cars? I've seen a few at races and car shows, and always marvled at seemingly small sway bars. Are they really small (in comparison with our street cars?) Or is it just an issue of low vehicle weight and a low center of gravity?
I assume there are formulas out there for sway bar calculations -- I'll see if I can find some.
Does anyone have pictures, or experience with open wheel cars? I've seen a few at races and car shows, and always marvled at seemingly small sway bars. Are they really small (in comparison with our street cars?) Or is it just an issue of low vehicle weight and a low center of gravity?
I assume there are formulas out there for sway bar calculations -- I'll see if I can find some.
#43
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Nader Fotouhi
I have heard of many shops that use high spring rates to control roll and a light sway for fine adjustment.
#44
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've been doing a little sway bar research at my favorite place -- Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sway_bar), and came across this:
Wouldn't it be cool if there was some handy-dandy formula: as spring rates to car wight ratio increases by value X, the the sway bar's torsional rate should decrease by value Y.
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
Excessive roll stiffness, typically achieved by configuring an anti-roll bar too aggressively, will cause the inside wheels to lift off the ground during very hard cornering.
#45
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Confusing...
An entire page-and-a-half filled with questions that I offered answers to in post #12. Read a lot of the questions after that post, and then re-read #12. Am I on everyone's ignore list?
On a track car;
- Springs control roll/squat (forward/lateral motion).
- Sways control F/R balance.
Sways work like any other restrictive device, when it comes to balance. They reduce resilience (grip) of one end of the car, the defacto result of which is that the other end then has more resilience (grip), in relative terms. When you reach the point where the reduction in resilience (grip) that a sway bar causes becomes excessive, you need a stiffer spring, not more sway bar.
I offer that for the same reason you unhook sways when you corner balance, you should do the same to get a baseline for the balance of your chassis. If at this point you discover gross inadaquacies in the cars handling, you should be looking at springs (since they are the only thing there working, other than damping).
You'd ideally like to have it pretty close with the main component (springs) instead of relying on secondary components (sways, damping) to cover for larger abnormalities than they really should.
An entire page-and-a-half filled with questions that I offered answers to in post #12. Read a lot of the questions after that post, and then re-read #12. Am I on everyone's ignore list?
![ducking](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/icon107.gif)
On a track car;
- Springs control roll/squat (forward/lateral motion).
- Sways control F/R balance.
Sways work like any other restrictive device, when it comes to balance. They reduce resilience (grip) of one end of the car, the defacto result of which is that the other end then has more resilience (grip), in relative terms. When you reach the point where the reduction in resilience (grip) that a sway bar causes becomes excessive, you need a stiffer spring, not more sway bar.
I offer that for the same reason you unhook sways when you corner balance, you should do the same to get a baseline for the balance of your chassis. If at this point you discover gross inadaquacies in the cars handling, you should be looking at springs (since they are the only thing there working, other than damping).
You'd ideally like to have it pretty close with the main component (springs) instead of relying on secondary components (sways, damping) to cover for larger abnormalities than they really should.