Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Nitrogen question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2006, 09:55 AM
  #1  
Boulder GT3
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Boulder GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 490
Received 10 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Nitrogen question

How much less does nitrogen expand vs. compressed air? If I go to the track on a cool morning of 60 degrees, by the time I get to the middle of the day at 80 degrees I will have bleed off 10-12lbs or so. What would the pressure build difference be if I was using nitrogen? Thanks.
Old 10-01-2006, 11:42 AM
  #2  
mhm993
Rennlist Member
 
mhm993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Schattenbaum/MNY Regions
Posts: 2,872
Received 222 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

Admitting I have no factual knowledge, I wonder, since air is mostly nitrogen, can there be a big difference?
Old 10-01-2006, 11:49 AM
  #3  
Boulder GT3
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Boulder GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 490
Received 10 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mhm993
Admitting I have no factual knowledge, I wonder, since air is mostly nitrogen, can there be a big difference?
That's what I wonder. That said, the big advantage of nitrogen is that it does not expand and contract as much with heat. Making me a bit more skeptical is that our colorado air is low humidity to start with. nevertheless, if nitrogen will cut the pressure build up some amount I may try using it.
Old 10-01-2006, 11:57 AM
  #4  
38D
Nordschleife Master
 
38D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: About to pass you...
Posts: 6,666
Received 830 Likes on 417 Posts
Default

I believe that the difference has more to do with water vapor than anything else. Compressed Nitrogen has very little water vapor, so it expands very little. You can probably also put a drier on you compressor to get some benefits.
Old 10-01-2006, 12:26 PM
  #5  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,477
Received 1,061 Likes on 547 Posts
Default

There was a good thread on this not long ago. One of the items noted was that it is not just simply letting the air out and filling with N2.

Do a search and you will find it. It was 2 pages long.
Old 10-01-2006, 12:35 PM
  #6  
Boulder GT3
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Boulder GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 490
Received 10 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan C.
There was a good thread on this not long ago. One of the items noted was that it is not just simply letting the air out and filling with N2.
When I looked at the threads I could find references to the "supposed" benefits of lower pressure build up but I can't find anyone who knows from experience. Certainly most pro teams use it but is that for a small benefit or does it really cut down on the expansion and contraction?

I'm trying to figure out if it is worth hassle of mounting a tank in the trailer and not a compressor.
Old 10-01-2006, 12:38 PM
  #7  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,477
Received 1,061 Likes on 547 Posts
Default

From what I gathered you had to bleed the tires several times and the pressure change was then minimized not eliminated.
Old 10-01-2006, 12:42 PM
  #8  
Boulder GT3
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Boulder GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 490
Received 10 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan C.
From what I gathered you had to bleed the tires several times and the pressure change was then minimized not eliminated.
Roger that. I was picking up up 4lbs in a 30 minutes session starting with tires in the 140 degree range.
Old 10-01-2006, 01:09 PM
  #9  
Dbltime
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dbltime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: W. Palm Beach & Annapolis
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

My experience with Nitrogen was mixed. From zero expansion to 10#. Contamination from various sources maybe but basic pump air is predictable and Nitrogen is not.
Old 10-01-2006, 01:13 PM
  #10  
Boulder GT3
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Boulder GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 490
Received 10 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bill walczak
My experience with Nitrogen was mixed. From zero expansion to 10#. Contamination from various sources maybe but basic pump air is predictable and Nitrogen is not.
Thanks Bill. I didn't want to load the question but that's what I've heard.
Old 10-01-2006, 01:32 PM
  #11  
AW
Pro
 
AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nitrogen, just like basic air, expands with heat. However, unlike basic air, nitrogen expands consistently.

By using nitrogen, you can precisely predict your hot pressure from a cold pressure and ambient temperature.

As many said, basic air contains random moisture which makes this prediction impossible.

If you do driving events, you can probably use some air and adjust your pressure throughout the day.

However, if you are racing and need your tires to be absolutely perfect for a race and you have no opportunity to adjust the pressure once the session is started, nitrogen is a must have.

AW
Old 10-01-2006, 02:06 PM
  #12  
Tom W
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Tom W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I do not believe that nitrogen will make a significant difference. I'm a scientist and refuse to believe anecdotal information that conflicts with basic physics.

P = nRT/V is fundemantal physics for an "ideal" gas. While air is not "ideal", it's pretty close (and close enough for the race track). What it means is that your pressure will vary in direct proportion to the temperature (as Volume is fixed) and the actual type of gas will not matter. Now, I've listened to the "water makes a difference" crowd and agree that water (and not water vapror) would make a difference as it changes from liquid to vapor. If when you have your tires changed you see liquid water inside the rims, then it might be time to switch to nitrogen. On the other hand, water vapor is a gas and obeys the same laws of physics that nitrogen does.
Old 10-01-2006, 02:10 PM
  #13  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,477
Received 1,061 Likes on 547 Posts
Default

This is why I enjoyed this thread so much the last time
Old 10-01-2006, 02:22 PM
  #14  
AW
Pro
 
AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Tom,

As you know I'm no scientist. But with the cup car I have to get the michelin slicks within a range of 2 psi hot or the car feels really bad. For me, using nitrogen made a very big difference in term of being able to predict expansion from cold pressure / temperature.

With air I can easily see expansion of +2-3psi which is just pushing the tire outside of its operating range.

AW
Old 10-01-2006, 02:32 PM
  #15  
Nordschleife
Drifting
 
Nordschleife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Munich
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AW
Tom,

As you know I'm no scientist. But with the cup car I have to get the michelin slicks within a range of 2 psi hot or the car feels really bad. For me, using nitrogen made a very big difference in term of being able to predict expansion from cold pressure / temperature.

With air I can easily see expansion of +2-3psi which is just pushing the tire outside of its operating range.

AW
as you point out there is a big difference between theory and practice. In practice Nitrogen is the way to go.

R+C


Quick Reply: Nitrogen question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:45 AM.