Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

SCCA ITR -> Supercup -> PCA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2006, 05:04 PM
  #1  
Brian Morris
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Brian Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default SCCA ITR -> Supercup -> PCA

I'm surprised I haven't seen any discussion of the new SCCA ITR class. It includes the 911SC, 944S2, 968 and Boxster at various weights. Similar to ITS but slightly more powerful cars.

I would think the S2 and 968 in ITR trim could be added to the 944 Supercup, and therefore to PCA racing.

Here's the latest SCCA Fastrack with the car list:

http://www.scca.com/_FileLibrary/Fil...0-fastrack.pdf

--Brian Morris
89 951
Old 09-27-2006, 05:54 PM
  #2  
chrisp
Three Wheelin'
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Do SCCA weights include driver? If so then a 200lb driver (including all safety gear) can race a 2430 lb SC. (SCCA is listed at 2630 lbs.)
Old 09-27-2006, 06:06 PM
  #3  
Brian Morris
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Brian Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SCCA weights include driver.
Old 09-27-2006, 06:08 PM
  #4  
Nader Fotouhi
Rennlist Member
 
Nader Fotouhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Garden State
Posts: 1,017
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

There certinly has been a great deal of discussion and anticipation for ITR at Improvedtouring.com Like most new things, it will take a while to generate buzz about the new class. Looking at the list of cars, it looks like a very nice mix.

Having an S2, I was very excited about the possibility of running against different makes. However, IIRC, IT rules require running the original suspension configuration. Given that I have built a car to PCA F-Class rules that allow coilover and aftermarket a-arms, I canot run ITR. I will probably continue to checkout the discussion about this and who knows, I may have some parts for sale and be looking to buy others at some point.

Nader
Old 09-28-2006, 09:07 AM
  #5  
924RACR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
924RACR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 3,991
Received 83 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Correct, aftermarket a-arms and coilovers are not IT-legal...

Big torsion bars are your friend!
Old 09-28-2006, 10:53 AM
  #6  
chrisp
Three Wheelin'
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For those of you familiar with both SCCA and PCA rules. Assuming it's built to the limit of PCA rules, is a PCA stock class car (in this case a G class SC) ITR elligible without any changes?
Old 09-28-2006, 11:01 AM
  #7  
jaydubya
Racer
 
jaydubya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrisp
For those of you familiar with both SCCA and PCA rules. Assuming it's built to the limit of PCA rules, is a PCA stock class car (in this case a G class SC) ITR elligible without any changes?
Unfortunately, no. Fiberglass bumpers are not allowed in IT classes. Must have the stock bumpers.

Also, there is some question about rear spoilers as well.

Some discussion here:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showt...hreadid=296584
Old 09-28-2006, 11:09 AM
  #8  
Nader Fotouhi
Rennlist Member
 
Nader Fotouhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Garden State
Posts: 1,017
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

It may all depends on the spoiler on G class Sc. IIRC, the SCCA rules for presence, shape, and size of the spoiler are more restrictive. SCCA GCR is now on line and gives you all the details.
Old 09-28-2006, 11:49 AM
  #9  
chrisp
Three Wheelin'
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Although I've only ever concerned myslef with PCA rules I would imagine that getting an SC down in the low to mid 2400's with stock bodywork would be a challenge. To meet SCCA weight for the same 200lb driver figure above I would have to put back on the stock bodywork (+30-35lbs) remove my ballast (-30lbs) and then shed 120 lbs from the car. I'm not sure where I would pull it from.
Old 09-28-2006, 01:12 PM
  #10  
Nader Fotouhi
Rennlist Member
 
Nader Fotouhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Garden State
Posts: 1,017
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by chrisp
I'm not sure where I would pull it from.
Inside the engin and interior.

Nader
Old 09-28-2006, 06:25 PM
  #11  
Bill L Seifert
Three Wheelin'
 
Bill L Seifert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hailey, Idaho
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It is very hard to have a car in any one group, SCCA, PCA, etc, exactly fit in the other groups. SCCA will not allow after market A arms, while PCA will. SCCA will not let a lot of fiberglass in, nor wings or spoilers that are not on all cars, classified. If you are going to race both groups, you have to make compromises.

Bill Seifert

1987 944S Race Car
Old 09-28-2006, 06:42 PM
  #12  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill L Seifert
If you are going to race both groups, you have to make compromises.
Yep. Exactly right. Spec the car for the series you'd run the most. Then you can be competitive there and fine a place to race with the "other group". As you as you meet the rules you can probably have fun in the show.

Anycar that is built to the limit of one rule set is liable to someway illeagal or underprepared for another group no mater how "close" the classes.

As far as I know only in Spec Miata or 944 spec can you run a 98-100% prep car in different orgs.

Spec Miata in SCCA, NASA I believe
944Spec in PCA, NASA, POC
SP2 & SP3 are rather convoluted since many SP2 and SP3 cars were in fact PCA cars to start with.



Quick Reply: SCCA ITR -> Supercup -> PCA



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:48 AM.