Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Need help selecting rear spoiler, PCA G stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2006, 10:59 AM
  #31  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,572
Received 257 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

My 78 SC had a fiberglass rear hatch on it when I got it and it sure looked like a stock piece, i.e. a perfect fit and no sign of "aftermarket" on it. I changed it simply because I like the solid spoiler vs. te rubber edged one. IF it is stock and was either standard eqipment or special order the way I have had the rules explained is as long as it was avialable as oem then it is legal. Now I could be way off as I certainly didn't buy the car new..
Old 07-04-2006, 02:45 PM
  #32  
comatb
Rennlist Member
 
comatb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 38D
The reason they won't change the rules to allow 944s to change the rear hatch is that it would need to apply to all models (911s, etc). You cant give just one model the right to remove weight up high and redistribute it down low with ballast.
Hi Colin, in practice many 911's(Carrera's and older) do in fact enjoy this advantage. PCA should either enforce the rule or allow not only 944s to do the same thing but all stock class cars.

Bill
Colin we met at the Glen. Mantis 944 I class winner 2006 Glen enduro
Old 07-04-2006, 03:40 PM
  #33  
flatsics
Rennlist Member
 
flatsics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: springfield, il
Posts: 1,471
Received 35 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I'm sure sure we would be willing to give up our rear decklid advantage for some rear coilovers

Last edited by flatsics; 07-04-2006 at 03:55 PM.
Old 07-04-2006, 04:24 PM
  #34  
comatb
Rennlist Member
 
comatb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi flatsics, your good, pointed response has me laughing. However we could debate so many points....like the fact that 911's enjoy a power to weight advantage in EVERY stock class. Really the reason for wanting lexan rear hatches is that it would be safer. The consequences of a rear hit in a 944 are much more likely and dangerous than in a 911 in regards to the rear glass. They are also all old and delaminating. It would admitedly lower our center of gravity and make the mounting of spoilers and or wings easier. If not changed, then the rules should be enforced for all.

Bill
Old 07-05-2006, 01:50 PM
  #35  
Carrera51
Rennlist Member
 
Carrera51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Keswick, VA
Posts: 3,890
Received 172 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Why not just pick up an OEM Turbo tail off the rennlist classifieds? It will attach to your stock decklid. I have heard (I may be wrong) that the Turbo tail actually provides some downforce, while the Carrera tail only reduces lift.

I've raced against plenty of F class Carreras and seen plenty of G clas SCs running with turbo tails and have never heard of it being an issue.

For clarification, email Donna Amico as others have suggested.
Old 07-08-2006, 09:10 AM
  #36  
comatb
Rennlist Member
 
comatb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"It has been allowed since way before my time for 911s to replace the rear
deck lid when adding a spoiler, and this just about always means that the
deck lid is a lightweight material, e.g. fiberglass. If the car normally
has an AC condenser mounted to the deck lid, you have to figure out how to
mount the AC condenser to the fiberglass -- the condenser cannot be removed
or relocated."

Donna

Donna's response posted here with her permission. So why can't 944's add a lightweight panel attached to a different spoiler like 911's?

Bill
Old 07-08-2006, 07:09 PM
  #37  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,572
Received 257 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

That's strange, because I completely removed all A/C eqipment as I was told as long as you could get a No A/C SC in 1978 then it is legal.
Old 07-09-2006, 11:04 AM
  #38  
jaydubya
Racer
Thread Starter
 
jaydubya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bill - thanks very much for Donna's response.

Gary - I wonder if my 82 would have to retain the A/C stuff since I don't believe it was an option for that year. I was told by other club racers that removing the A/C stuff would be unlikely to be protested as long as I maintained the compressor.
Old 07-09-2006, 01:16 PM
  #39  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,572
Received 257 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Jay - Is it possible for you to check with someone that is a tech scrutineer for your area? Hate to see you get called on something.. The shop that built my car and advises me IS a tech guy for PCA Club Racing so I pretty much trust everything he tells me..
Old 09-19-2006, 06:05 PM
  #40  
smsarchitects
Rennlist Member
 
smsarchitects's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC/Sag Harbor/Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 1,099
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

On the topic of removing AC, what removing the air pump and air injectors from my '78 911SC?
Old 09-19-2006, 08:02 PM
  #41  
38D
Nordschleife Master
 
38D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: About to pass you...
Posts: 6,625
Received 787 Likes on 401 Posts
Default

"G. Air conditioning belts and air injection systems may be removed."

No problem to remove.



Quick Reply: Need help selecting rear spoiler, PCA G stock



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:58 PM.