Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Early-meets-Late 911 Aero Idea

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2006, 06:48 PM
  #1  
JackOlsen
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
JackOlsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,920
Received 62 Likes on 48 Posts
Default Early-meets-Late 911 Aero Idea



At the track, I run a big 3.8RS rear decklid with extensions and a 50-odd inch wing. It does a great job at reducing my car's high-speed lift, but I'll make no secret of the fact that I don't like the way it looks.

So, I'd like to replace it with something else. The problem is, none of the pre-1989 tails can match its capabilities.

Oddly, modern 996's and 997's have adopted something close to the ducktail in back, and the newer track models add a simple extension and wing. I know the new cars have totally different aerodynamic footprints, but seeing the recent cars has got me thinking about adding something similar to a ducktail.

Here's what I mean about the newer cars:







Now, my gut reaction to the new configuration would be that the lower element would seem to put a higher-pressure zone right where the upper element is relying on lower pressure -- i.e., the 'ducktail' is pushing air up toward the low-pressure underside of the elevated wing. Obviously, Porsche wouldn't be doing this if my gut-driven analysis were correct. Can anyone fill me in on what the air is doing with the two elements on the 996/997 cars?

And also, does anyone have input on the viability of adding a wing in a similar way to an early car?

Imagine a set of curved uprights and an elevated wing being added to a silhouette like this:



Would I want the wing forward of the ducktail, or behind it, or right above it?

I know I'll be giving up some of the cooling advantages of the 3.8RS decklid, and I know it still won't look period-correct. But at least it won't be as huge.

I assume the higher the wing is elevated, the better (for the sake of clean airflow) -- but then, my assumptions are based on precious little real knowledge.

Any input?
Old 05-17-2006, 07:37 PM
  #2  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What about a 935 wing?

Old 05-17-2006, 07:43 PM
  #3  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A rear view....

Old 05-17-2006, 08:31 PM
  #4  
earlyapex
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
earlyapex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 3,161
Received 62 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Jack,

I don't think the aerodynamics of this design is adverse. The 996 GT3 tail base is also used to force air into the engine and get a few extra hp. Dual element wings are very common in open wheeled cars so the two wings should work together to increase total downforce. GT Racing has their version of the 996 GT3 tail base and uprights for the 911. The package would look much less bulky than the 3.8L style wings commonly used. I met someone from SoCal with an early car using the GT Racing base and a set of custom short uprights for less drag and better straight line speeds.

http://www.gt-racing.com/catalog/default.htm
Old 05-18-2006, 01:29 PM
  #5  
Cory M
Drifting
 
Cory M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,456
Received 74 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Looks like GT has exactly what you're after, it isn't cheap but maybe you can use your existing airfoil.



Quick Reply: Early-meets-Late 911 Aero Idea



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:30 AM.