This really pisses me off...
#46
Originally Posted by TD in DC
Now, if you are talking about limits on the size of judgments, then maybe MickeyD's is a good example to discuss. However, it is clear in that case that the jurors were trying to send MickeyD's a message. More importantly, however, we are not talking about the size of judgments here . . . that is a discussion for another day.
#47
Originally Posted by TD in DC
...I would be much happier to represent you in fighting for the right not to have sunroofs, cup holders and traction control than for forcing Porsche to requiring us to buy them for our own safety and convenience.