HOW STIFF DO YOU WANT YOUR CHASSIS?
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In a recent discussion with a fellow racer I was quite surprised when he indicated to me that a "Porsche guru" had indicated to him that when building a cage into your car you do not want to have the chassis too stiff. In fact, he said, that you actually want flex in the rear chassis. "Many guys make their car too stiff." he said.
The guy that told me this tale is a newbie to building cars and he is looking around for advice from many different sources.
I was surprised and tried to explain that (IMHO) a chassis should be as rigid as possible to allow the suspension to do its own work - especially as you go stiffer on springs.
I posted this for you to indicate whether a stiff chassis, in your opinion, is more desireable that a flexing chassis. (I will then direct him and the "Porsche guru" here to read your opinions). Hopefully I will not have egg on my face!
Thanks guys.
Johan
The guy that told me this tale is a newbie to building cars and he is looking around for advice from many different sources.
I was surprised and tried to explain that (IMHO) a chassis should be as rigid as possible to allow the suspension to do its own work - especially as you go stiffer on springs.
I posted this for you to indicate whether a stiff chassis, in your opinion, is more desireable that a flexing chassis. (I will then direct him and the "Porsche guru" here to read your opinions). Hopefully I will not have egg on my face!
Thanks guys.
Johan
#2
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If the chassis is not stiff enough you will have a very hard time setting up the suspension since it might be stiffer than the body. On 996 Cup cars it can be a problem setting the swaybars to stiff since the swaybar will be stiffer than the body flex.
#3
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Indeed;
It is well known that you want a chassis as stiff as possible. Suspension tuning is all about variables. At the track, you can tune the suspension, but you can not tune the chassis, so you want to eliminate that variable. Otherwise, you are litterally chasing a moving target. At some point you will make a setting change, but see no effect, or not the effect you know from experience should be the result. You keep tuning, but your results are not linear like they are on a stiff chassis. When you can't get the result you expect, you are then lost and guessing.
Stiff is best.
It is well known that you want a chassis as stiff as possible. Suspension tuning is all about variables. At the track, you can tune the suspension, but you can not tune the chassis, so you want to eliminate that variable. Otherwise, you are litterally chasing a moving target. At some point you will make a setting change, but see no effect, or not the effect you know from experience should be the result. You keep tuning, but your results are not linear like they are on a stiff chassis. When you can't get the result you expect, you are then lost and guessing.
Stiff is best.
#5
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Quote: "It's really just too easy to take a swing at this one..."
What does that mean?
There is no question, Stiff is best. Look at Indy Cars, F1, etc, etc. You don't want the chasis to be a spring. It's impossible to adjust.
Bill Seifert
1987 944S Race Car
What does that mean?
There is no question, Stiff is best. Look at Indy Cars, F1, etc, etc. You don't want the chasis to be a spring. It's impossible to adjust.
Bill Seifert
1987 944S Race Car
#6
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Bill L Seifert
Quote: "It's really just too easy to take a swing at this one..."
What does that mean?
What does that mean?
![hiha](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif)
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car
CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car
CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.
#7
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by RedlineMan
Indeed;
It is well known that you want a chassis as stiff as possible. Suspension tuning is all about variables. At the track, you can tune the suspension, but you can not tune the chassis, so you want to eliminate that variable. Otherwise, you are litterally chasing a moving target. At some point you will make a setting change, but see no effect, or not the effect you know from experience should be the result. You keep tuning, but your results are not linear like they are on a stiff chassis. When you can't get the result you expect, you are then lost and guessing.
Stiff is best.
It is well known that you want a chassis as stiff as possible. Suspension tuning is all about variables. At the track, you can tune the suspension, but you can not tune the chassis, so you want to eliminate that variable. Otherwise, you are litterally chasing a moving target. At some point you will make a setting change, but see no effect, or not the effect you know from experience should be the result. You keep tuning, but your results are not linear like they are on a stiff chassis. When you can't get the result you expect, you are then lost and guessing.
Stiff is best.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Bill, you're thinking with the wrong head.
![hiha](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif)
#14
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JCP911S
"Porsche guru" is often just the guy with the biggest mouth.... chassis cannot be too stiff IMHO
#15
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Oh Bruddah!
Two different cases of not getting "IT" one might surmize. What a hoot!
Anyone with a pre 964 911 chassis that ran much North of 500lb springs has learned this lesson... hopefully. You keep adjusting and nothing happens. The springs aint moving, the CHASSIS is. Targas are worse, of course.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Two different cases of not getting "IT" one might surmize. What a hoot!
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Anyone with a pre 964 911 chassis that ran much North of 500lb springs has learned this lesson... hopefully. You keep adjusting and nothing happens. The springs aint moving, the CHASSIS is. Targas are worse, of course.