Run with the spare?
#31
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Jupiter
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DrJupeman
I also suspect removing any weight from a 911, even if up front, will yield laptime benefits if the car is tuned for it....
Stephen
#32
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FixedWing
I wonder if you even need to add this caveat? I would think reducing weight, even if it upsets the ideal balance of the car, will have benefits which will outweigh the less than optimal set-up.
Stephen
Stephen
Let's say you needed it to make weight for PCA but weight did not matter for other clubs. You set your car up for PCA weight (spare in). Now, you do a NASA event where you can remove the spare. Are you saying no matter what, you would remove it? That's exactly what I thought but it didn't work for me.
George
#33
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by George A
Are you saying that 30 pounds removed from the front of 911 outweighs the benefits of having better front to rear balance? Why do you think so?
Let's say you needed it to make weight for PCA but weight did not matter for other clubs. You set your car up for PCA weight (spare in). Now, you do a NASA event where you can remove the spare. Are you saying no matter what, you would remove it? That's exactly what I thought but it didn't work for me.
George
Let's say you needed it to make weight for PCA but weight did not matter for other clubs. You set your car up for PCA weight (spare in). Now, you do a NASA event where you can remove the spare. Are you saying no matter what, you would remove it? That's exactly what I thought but it didn't work for me.
George
I think if you set the car up for the spare and then take it out on an adhoc basis without adjusting for the weight difference your laptimes may fall (braking and acceleration will be improved), however it won't be optimal and you may not be used to the "feel". This alone may hinder your laptimes.
Otherwise, decreasing weight increases the available traction the tires can give you for lateral acceleration (assuming you can still reach optimal tire temperature, etc - this is complicated).
#35
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Mine never had a spare.
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car
CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car
CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.
#36
Originally Posted by George A
Are you saying that 30 pounds removed from the front of 911 outweighs the benefits of having better front to rear balance? Why do you think so?
Let's say you needed it to make weight for PCA but weight did not matter for other clubs. You set your car up for PCA weight (spare in). Now, you do a NASA event where you can remove the spare. Are you saying no matter what, you would remove it? That's exactly what I thought but it didn't work for me.
George
Let's say you needed it to make weight for PCA but weight did not matter for other clubs. You set your car up for PCA weight (spare in). Now, you do a NASA event where you can remove the spare. Are you saying no matter what, you would remove it? That's exactly what I thought but it didn't work for me.
George
#37
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by FixedWing
I wonder if you even need to add this caveat? I would think reducing weight, even if it upsets the ideal balance of the car, will have benefits which will outweigh the less than optimal set-up.
Stephen
Stephen
Also, one of the instructors tried his car (lightweight 74 911) without the spare this summer to see what would happen. The nose of the car sat visibly higher and he complained that it didn't turn in as well and was slower. He put it back in.
#38
I'm not trying to insult anyone here but I wonder what a professional would think about this subject. I know that when I moved from a 951 to a 996, I hated all the understeer. Now I love the 996 and am much faster but it took a while to learn how to drive it well. I guess the same can be said, to a lesser degree, about changing the balance of an existing car. I think that if you took out the spare for a few months and compared times, your times would improve somewhat.
#39
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Charlie,
Under that theory, removing 30lbs from the front of a 911 would yield the same exact performance improvement as taking 30lbs out of the engine compartment. Is that what you are saying?
I think "feel" plays a big role for someone at my skill level. Changing the car for different events introduces another factor I have to deal with at the track. I feel as I have way too many already. I think that eventually, you could get the car to be faster, but how long would it take and would it be worth it? Especially if have to go back and forth for different events.
George
Under that theory, removing 30lbs from the front of a 911 would yield the same exact performance improvement as taking 30lbs out of the engine compartment. Is that what you are saying?
I think "feel" plays a big role for someone at my skill level. Changing the car for different events introduces another factor I have to deal with at the track. I feel as I have way too many already. I think that eventually, you could get the car to be faster, but how long would it take and would it be worth it? Especially if have to go back and forth for different events.
George
#40
Nordschleife Master
Laptimes would definitely improve, albeit a very small change. 30lbs is probably on the order of 0.1 - 0.2 seconds max at 2+ min track like Watkins Glen or Road America.
#41
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I agree that things like a little more trailbraking to get the nose into the corner is helpful, but where I found the difference is the corners that are taken flat out. With those types of corners, you can't put weight on the nose without lifting, which defeats the purpose of removing weight.
As for a Pro, I assume they can drive around most handling problems, but they also have the equiptment at the track to rebalance the car if they want. I doubt too many pro drivers would go out for a practice session, come in and say "it turns in like ****, but don't bother to change it, I'll just drive around it"
As for a Pro, I assume they can drive around most handling problems, but they also have the equiptment at the track to rebalance the car if they want. I doubt too many pro drivers would go out for a practice session, come in and say "it turns in like ****, but don't bother to change it, I'll just drive around it"
#42
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Jupiter
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with Charlie and Mitch. Removing weight should always improve lap times even if it leaves the car less than optimally set-up. The problem is that the driver himself may need to change his style. If a driver prefers a car that turns in crisply and has a tendency to oversteer then he might not like the poorer turn-in and greater understeer. His discomfort would hamper lap times. But maybe it is up to the driver to modify his style to take maximum advantage of the car he now has?
As a seperate thought, I often think we set cars up to be to our liking and not necessarily to be at their fastestest.
Stephen
As a seperate thought, I often think we set cars up to be to our liking and not necessarily to be at their fastestest.
Stephen
#43
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FixedWing
As a seperate thought, I often think we set cars up to be to our liking and not necessarily to be at their fastestest.
Stephen
Stephen
BTW, I'm really against terms like "always". It seems like there are always exceptions.
George
#44
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by FixedWing
I agree with Charlie and Mitch. Removing weight should always improve lap times even if it leaves the car less than optimally set-up. The problem is that the driver himself may need to change his style. If a driver prefers a car that turns in crisply and has a tendency to oversteer then he might not like the poorer turn-in and greater understeer. His discomfort would hamper lap times. But maybe it is up to the driver to modify his style to take maximum advantage of the car he now has?
As a seperate thought, I often think we set cars up to be to our liking and not necessarily to be at their fastestest.
Stephen
As a seperate thought, I often think we set cars up to be to our liking and not necessarily to be at their fastestest.
Stephen
In one of Carrol Smiths' books (I can't remember which), it talks about setting up the car to suit the driver's ability. I'd have to look up the exact quote, but it says something like setting up the car to be "fast" is usless if your driver can't be fast in it.