Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AIM Data Acq and 1988 944 Turbo S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2005, 12:31 PM
  #1  
Rick
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
Thread Starter
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Carmel, IN
Posts: 3,018
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default AIM Data Acq and 1988 944 Turbo S

I'm contemplating purchasing an AIM dash and was curious if any connection can be made to this car's ECU or if all of the data must be gathered via installed sensors.

Anyone know?

Thanks,

Rick
Old 04-12-2005, 12:40 PM
  #2  
ColorChange
Three Wheelin'
 
ColorChange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rick: You need hard sensors. They are working on a 996 ECU tie in and have it for cup cars already.

[edit] looks like I'm wrong. Sorry.

Last edited by ColorChange; 04-12-2005 at 11:00 PM.
Old 04-12-2005, 01:00 PM
  #3  
APKhaos
Drifting
 
APKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Rick,
The news is better than that!
You can pick up RPM, throttle position, and brake binary from the Turbo S DME/KLR.
Temps, pressures and the rest require hard sensors, but you can always add them later.
Old 04-12-2005, 01:48 PM
  #4  
penguinking
Burning Brakes
 
penguinking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what kind of AIM dash? MXL?
Old 04-12-2005, 01:53 PM
  #5  
Rick
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
Thread Starter
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Carmel, IN
Posts: 3,018
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'm leaning towards the Mycron 3 Gold - I can't find a compelling reason (for me) to spend the additional money on the Pista.

Any perspective on the 2 systems?
Old 04-12-2005, 01:59 PM
  #6  
penguinking
Burning Brakes
 
penguinking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

in the karting community the mychron3 gold is incredibly popular - speed, rpm, temp sensors. plus g-force sensors and 3D track mapping - its a steal at the price it costs. the regular mychron 3 and mychron 3 plus don't have the track mapping or the g-load sensors, not worth it IMO. i'm hoping to upgrade to a M3 Gold over the summer. the MXL is just insane. i'd put that thing on an LMP car, but couldnt see any reason to have one in club racing
Old 04-12-2005, 02:18 PM
  #7  
ngoldrich
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
ngoldrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: cincinnati,oh
Posts: 1,364
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have the MXL pro and have already used/consumed all of the analog channels. So I will be upgrading again so I can use about 16 analog channels.

It all depends on the level of racing you will be doing coupled with what data you want/need to record & analyze.

The MXL is very simple to use and very cost effective compared to the other top systems. My other cars had Pi System 4 plus, Motec, and Prodata Indycar setup - and the MXL is exponentially easier to setup and use and also way more cost effective.

So it just depends on your specific wants and needs. In terms of high quality data acq, the MXL is a good value (in comparison). Although it is still a good amount of money. If you really do not need all the bells and whistles, no need to spend the money; go with a system that does what you really need.

If you really are not going to analyze the data, just get a laptimer that also records rpm & speed (and maybe g).

If you can use an ecu link (CAN or serial) you can get away with fewer analog sensors.

My shifter kart has the M3 Gold XG and it works well...

Hope that helps.

Norm
Old 04-12-2005, 02:22 PM
  #8  
penguinking
Burning Brakes
 
penguinking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

upgrading to the DRACK system? i think thats the next rung up on the AiM ladder
Old 04-12-2005, 02:27 PM
  #9  
ngoldrich
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
ngoldrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: cincinnati,oh
Posts: 1,364
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No, I believe the MXL PRO is now their highest model. I am not sure they are continuing with the Drack. I am not sure they are even continuing with their EVO model, since they have less features than the new MXL Pro.

I may be switching the the new MXL pro which has 12 instead of 8 analog channels and 16 MB instead of 8MB ram. Then add a 4 analog channel CAN expansion box.

I may just go with Motec then I can easily cascade to 32 channels if needed...

I am still researching...

Norm
Old 04-12-2005, 02:30 PM
  #10  
penguinking
Burning Brakes
 
penguinking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

theres one system (not AiM) that has GPS track mapping instead of using wheel sensors...about a grand but i forget what its called. interesting read because it claims using wheel sensors can be inaccurate because expansion of the tire and under load can cause the numbers to read up to 4% +/-
Old 04-12-2005, 02:39 PM
  #11  
ngoldrich
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
ngoldrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: cincinnati,oh
Posts: 1,364
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That's the DL-90 I believe.

I dont have any experience with it.

Norm
Old 04-12-2005, 02:53 PM
  #12  
APKhaos
Drifting
 
APKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by penguinking
theres one system (not AiM) that has GPS track mapping instead of using wheel sensors...about a grand but i forget what its called. interesting read because it claims using wheel sensors can be inaccurate because expansion of the tire and under load can cause the numbers to read up to 4% +/-
That's the Race Technology DL-1. For around $900 [the sagging US$ has driven this up because its made in the UK] it provides good GPS, 2 axis Gs to 2G max or [optional] 10g max Compact flash storage, 8 analog inouts, 4 wheel/shart speed inputs, two RPM inputs [spark plug pickup & EMS signal], lap beacon input.

Its a great package for many drivers, but its not truly competitive if you want the level of logging and analysis that Norm and others at his level demand. Also, its a 'black box' logger. It does not have the real-time dash displays that are a key element of the AIM, Stack and MoTeC systems. Race Tech are releasing a dash display this year, but it will be interesting to see the combined price of their logger and display, and how this compares to AIM's MXL.

The AIM MXL series and the Stack products are probably the next step up. Similarly, MoTeC provides another level of sophistication [and price].

The traditional vendors designed their core technology before GPS was a real option. In their world, track position [adn track maps] are derived from a complex and somewhat innacurate analysis of speed and g forces. Race Tech designed with GPS from day one, which explains why its GPS features are inherent, and the others offer GPS as a fairly spendy option.

Like most things in motorsport, you buy what best suits your needs.

Last edited by APKhaos; 04-12-2005 at 03:25 PM.
Old 04-12-2005, 02:55 PM
  #13  
ngoldrich
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
ngoldrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: cincinnati,oh
Posts: 1,364
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Tony,

That's why I call racing the consumer sport. It will consume whatever you are willing to feed it...

Norm
Old 04-12-2005, 03:39 PM
  #14  
macnewma
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
macnewma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rick, that's cool. I would love to check out your data acq setup when you get it.
Old 04-12-2005, 06:22 PM
  #15  
RJay
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
RJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went with the MXL Pista as, at the time the cost differential was only a couple of hundred bucks between it an the M3 XG. Did debate between the advantage of the XGs steering mounted display versus the fixed one of the MXL but in the end the larger display + the potential of the GPS option tipped to the MXL. Contrary to what was said above I don't believe the GPS is available outside of the MXL range. If I were buying today, given the price increase, its a much tougher choice now. And then theres the DaVid to consider! Anyone out there ordered the GPS BTW? Does it eliminate the need for lap beacons?




Quick Reply: AIM Data Acq and 1988 944 Turbo S



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:28 AM.