Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Open face or full face helmet for DE?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2005, 05:27 AM
  #16  
Anir
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Anir's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 2,710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sweanders,

With all due respect, you're looking at the safety issue the wrong way. Of course, weight is important, but during rapid deceleration, the lightest open face helmet will provide plenty of mass to cause potentially fatal neck or brain contracoup injury. That's why a Hans or similar device is important. Facial protection is equally important, to prevent more than a "busted face".

One doesn't have to make an "either / or" choice.
Old 02-05-2005, 08:56 AM
  #17  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by sweanders
It is interesting to read such strong recommendations for full face helmets to save your face when noboby has adressed the extra weight in a full face helmet. The extra weight might be the extra help to snap your neck if not using a Hans device.
Oh yeah, another good reason for getting a full-face is you cannot use a HANS or any other head and neck restraint with an open-face helmet.
Old 02-05-2005, 10:33 AM
  #18  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

My experience is that when a new standard comes forth, '05 in this case, and the helmets become available, the 5 year old rated helmets, or '00 rating, drop significantly in price. I get about 5 years out of a helmet, given that I use them a lot and sweat like a rented mule. The cost per year is close to equal given the discounts.
Old 02-05-2005, 06:02 PM
  #19  
TedA
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TedA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Deep Creek, Virginia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's your HEAD!
Old 02-05-2005, 07:50 PM
  #20  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Very GOOD! Which is why I would only use an approved helmet.....some are approved for 5 years and some for 10 years.
Old 02-05-2005, 08:23 PM
  #21  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 944Fest (aka Dan P)
Call it stupid if you want. I don't agree. I know folks who bought $400 SA95s in 2000, just before the new ones came out. They did one DE a year for 4 years, the helmet is like new, and yet they are looking at $400 bill to stay current. It is NOT utterly insane. Many track events (Trackquest for one) are fine with M buckets. How safe is that? Are you saying this SA95 was perfectly safe last October but is "utterly insane" to go out with this Febuary? No, I don't falsify helmet documents and it is cheating in an area not worthy of cutting corners, but "Insane"? No, it think not. Even if there is a negative impact, who is the victim? darwinsim at work.
I can't even believe we are having such a conversation. Falsifying a Snell sticker would get you a healthy suspension and/or fine in any organization if not outright kicked out. I'd vote for kicked out.

Unfortunately such Darwinism can have dire consequences for the sport if the idiot gets killed, especially if the family of the moron were to find out what he did. Nobody in the sport should accept anyone doing such a thing.
Old 02-05-2005, 08:34 PM
  #22  
ltc
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell

Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ltc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 29,323
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Post

Originally Posted by Anir
Of course, weight is important, but during rapid deceleration, the lightest open face helmet will provide plenty of mass to cause potentially fatal neck or brain contracoup injury. That's why a Hans or similar device is important. Facial protection is equally important, to prevent more than a "busted face".
I was under the impression that even without a helmet (merely for the sake of this discussion....or let's say a zero weight helmet), that a basilar skull fracture will likely occur in an impact simply due to head mass/geometry/momentum.
Old 02-05-2005, 09:52 PM
  #23  
JBH
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
JBH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 3,259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default



It has the largest opening and at $250, it is reasonably priced for someone just starting out in DE

Last edited by JBH; 02-06-2005 at 02:16 AM.
Old 02-06-2005, 12:27 AM
  #24  
Anir
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Anir's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 2,710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ltc
I was under the impression that even without a helmet (merely for the sake of this discussion....or let's say a zero weight helmet), that a basilar skull fracture will likely occur in an impact simply due to head mass/geometry/momentum.
Lewis,

You're absolutely right. The mass of the head is enough as it is. Any helmet worsens the situation, but I don't think anyone would argue that a helmet is not important.

Funny thing about life....you solve one problem only to exacerbate another. Hence the HANS device.

Another potential casualty of rapid decel injuries is an aortic tear. To my knowledge, they have not devised a sure-fire way to prevent that.
Old 02-06-2005, 08:06 AM
  #25  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,925
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I am planning on doing my first DE @ Gateway International Raceway in St. Louuis this fall and I need to buy a helmet
Dont' think it's been mentioned, but most events have a few loaner helmets. Borrow one if you can and see if you intend to continue to go to the track.
If you buy one, full face!
Old 02-06-2005, 08:19 PM
  #26  
Mike S.
Pro
 
Mike S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Several years ago, I recall seeing a fair number of WRC (pro rally) drivers wearing open faced helmets. I'm not sure if this is still the case today, but perhaps someone out there (Geo?) knows why they made this selection and of course why it was (still is?) allowed.

Mike
Old 02-06-2005, 11:18 PM
  #27  
ceboyd
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ceboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mount Prospect, IL
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've been using an open face because of my glasses (this way I can put it on and take it off without moving my glasses).. BUT my other half has talked me into getting a full faced now that we are getting faster.... (grumble grumble).. I know I know.. it is better/safer... but it'll be a PITA having to squish my glasses on every time!
Old 02-07-2005, 12:30 AM
  #28  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mike, the only reasons I can think of for WRC drivers to wear open face helmets is to facilitate in-car communication and for TV video. Not the greatest reasons I must say. You can still have helmet to helmet electronic communication and you can even record that on video. Sadly it will probably take a facial injury to change this.
Old 02-07-2005, 08:51 AM
  #29  
RJay
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
RJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by seege
RJay
I think you might have it backwards. The closed face helmets can break a jaw on airbag deployment.

I myself use a full face helmet with the airbag because it just seems like it would be safer.
My apologies, you are correct, I had the story backwards. We had the NER Ground School at HMS yesterday and I had a chance to speak with Joe Marko about this. The story is that a driver broke his jaw in an accident at an event (SCCA I believe)wearing a full-faced helmet. The driver blamed this on the helmet. Joe commissioned a study with Delphi (makers of airbags) and the results were esstentially inconclusive. I failed to ask him if they were only concerned with frontal impact, so I have no idea if side curtains pose a different set of problems. Basically, there were problems wearing either type of helmet in a crash in which the airbag deploys. Beyond the jaw issue, with an openface the airbag essentially attemtps to lift the helmet off the head of the wearer. If the straps are not fully secure this can be a big problem. Anyhoo, net/net, airbags simply aren't designed to work with people wearing helmets. So what are you to do?

Note to lawyers what follows is a list of possibilities, not a list of recommendations:

1) Don't wear a helmet in an airbag equipped car.
2) Don't drive on the track in a car with an airbag.
3) Turn the airbag off on-track
4) Take a sledge hammer to your front bumper and pre-deploy it prior to any on-track activities
5) Don't crash

Choice is up to you. I'm at option 2. I have a dedicated track car, I wear a full face helmet, I'm doing an awful lot of safety upgrades this winter. Adding an air bag isn't one of them.
Old 02-07-2005, 09:21 AM
  #30  
Mike S.
Pro
 
Mike S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Geo,

Originally Posted by Geo
Sadly it will probably take a facial injury to change this.
Sad, but true. Thanks for your thoughts.

I'm gonna have to lecture open face helmeted Markus Grönholm next time I see him

Mike


Quick Reply: Open face or full face helmet for DE?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:49 PM.