Stand21 pre-drilled (HANS) helmets
#1
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
http://fransurf.com/lareunion/stand2...nologie-2.html
Does anyone else know of other helmet manufacturers offering factory predrilling?
(starting to look at SA2005 helmets)
Does anyone else know of other helmet manufacturers offering factory predrilling?
(starting to look at SA2005 helmets)
#3
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
![Post](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Kim,
It was interesting that the helmet was homologated with the holes predrilled.
Some helmet manufacturers can/may void the warranty, as the holes are viewed as a 'modification' (since the original helmet was not tested/homologated with the holes)
It's just sort of interesting to see where things are headed with SFI38.1, etc.
It was interesting that the helmet was homologated with the holes predrilled.
Some helmet manufacturers can/may void the warranty, as the holes are viewed as a 'modification' (since the original helmet was not tested/homologated with the holes)
It's just sort of interesting to see where things are headed with SFI38.1, etc.
#4
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What a pain....first you must have a SFi38.1 H&H...but then you modify your helmet to accommodate one and now you may void the helmet warranty....I think I'll pick safety over the warranty problem...
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#6
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
![Post](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
George,
I agree. It's just interesting that 'Catch-22' scenarios, as described by Kim, may in fact develop, due to the introduction of uncoordinated standards/requirements.
I agree. It's just interesting that 'Catch-22' scenarios, as described by Kim, may in fact develop, due to the introduction of uncoordinated standards/requirements.