video camera suggestions
#16
Race Director
Originally Posted by mitch236
is your car worth that much?!?!
Well no not now since motor in garage and the car is outside
....but....
....on a good day with motor in the car to right buyer.... Who knows
#18
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Panasonic does have a solid state camera that records to memory cards. There are now 1GB, 2GB, and 4 GB cards. The camera is only around $400 I believe.
It is supposed to be able to record 2 hours on the larger cards. 2 GB cards are only around $400 now (I believe).
I have no idea how good the quality is.
On my Spice GTP I had a racecam and it worked well. On my CanAm car I simply purchased a good lipstick camera with 480 lines resolution along with a stereo audio board and plugged it in my camcorder. I had just as good luck with that at less than half the price of what I paid for my racecam.
Norm
It is supposed to be able to record 2 hours on the larger cards. 2 GB cards are only around $400 now (I believe).
I have no idea how good the quality is.
On my Spice GTP I had a racecam and it worked well. On my CanAm car I simply purchased a good lipstick camera with 480 lines resolution along with a stereo audio board and plugged it in my camcorder. I had just as good luck with that at less than half the price of what I paid for my racecam.
Norm
#19
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
I bought a mid level mini dv camcorder and a $150 warranty from circuit city. Sony model with vibration dampening. Seems to work good. The Race cam set up is the best set up I have seen. Mine works well when I mount the camera to the front downtube of the cage. Picture isn't as good if it is behind the driver, IMO.
#21
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
FWIW - For my current car I also simply use a tiny Sony.
However, I am putting together a 4 camera system with a realtime multiplexor so when I play it back I can even zoom in on any of the 4 cameras.
1 out the splitter, 1 out the back, 1 suspension cam, 1 side...
It will be able to record to a camcorder or a DVR - which I will probably use...
Norm
However, I am putting together a 4 camera system with a realtime multiplexor so when I play it back I can even zoom in on any of the 4 cameras.
1 out the splitter, 1 out the back, 1 suspension cam, 1 side...
It will be able to record to a camcorder or a DVR - which I will probably use...
Norm
#22
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
The RaceCam is pricey, but in this case you do get what you pay for. The video quality is outstanding for a few reasons:
- It's a wide-angle lens that shows much more of the inside of the car:
- What's not obvious is that there is a filter on the lens, darker at the top to compensate for the difference between the cockpit and windshield. You adjust this and the result is a more consistent image top to bottom.
- The audio is via a couple of small microphones that you can place so that there is less wind-noise, etc.
- The remote on/off start/stop button is great if you're like me and have ever forgotten to start the tape and only realize it while you're on the grid.
For examples, see Skip's Club Racing Videos.
I have no affiliation with the RaceCam folks, I just like their product.
- It's a wide-angle lens that shows much more of the inside of the car:
- What's not obvious is that there is a filter on the lens, darker at the top to compensate for the difference between the cockpit and windshield. You adjust this and the result is a more consistent image top to bottom.
- The audio is via a couple of small microphones that you can place so that there is less wind-noise, etc.
- The remote on/off start/stop button is great if you're like me and have ever forgotten to start the tape and only realize it while you're on the grid.
For examples, see Skip's Club Racing Videos.
I have no affiliation with the RaceCam folks, I just like their product.
#23
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by JackOlsen
Well, as a test, I just set up my camera and let the video shoot. I got 35 minutes on the 1 gig card, at 30 fps. I guess if I changed it to 15 fps, I'd get over an hour of footage per card. The camera shoots Quicktime video at 320x240
#24
Intermediate
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Things in the video arena change very quickly. But there are recorders that will store NTSC
~640x480 quality on 4Gb flash cards. I'm just scared to ask the price. (www.ffv.com)
There are also ruggedized hard drive storage models that have been successfully used in rallies
and other high vibration environments, but they're like $1400. (www.autoxcam.com)
For bullet cameras, you can get quality ones for $200-$300. Both of the types that I get from
autoxcam.com and chasecam.com have 480-line resolution and the 90degree lens so the field
of view is similar to the expensive racecam but for way less $.
The price and size of digital camcorders which have the analog input (for external cameras)
is going down very quickly, and I don't know if the flash card recorders will ever catch up.
I expect that very soon as the cost of the cards goes down and the power of the mpeg
encoders goes up that that technology will be fully incorporated into the average camcorders.
One thing that annoyed me, is that the Sony digital camcorder I got last year made a point
to advertise mpeg storage on compactflash, but all it will do for you is 8 frames/sec, which is
worthless. They have an out-dated encoder and scrape the bottom of the mpeg spec.
Disclaimer: I know the people of autoxcam and chasecam, and I would stand to gain if a person
bought a picture-in-picture unit that I'm responsible for
~640x480 quality on 4Gb flash cards. I'm just scared to ask the price. (www.ffv.com)
There are also ruggedized hard drive storage models that have been successfully used in rallies
and other high vibration environments, but they're like $1400. (www.autoxcam.com)
For bullet cameras, you can get quality ones for $200-$300. Both of the types that I get from
autoxcam.com and chasecam.com have 480-line resolution and the 90degree lens so the field
of view is similar to the expensive racecam but for way less $.
The price and size of digital camcorders which have the analog input (for external cameras)
is going down very quickly, and I don't know if the flash card recorders will ever catch up.
I expect that very soon as the cost of the cards goes down and the power of the mpeg
encoders goes up that that technology will be fully incorporated into the average camcorders.
One thing that annoyed me, is that the Sony digital camcorder I got last year made a point
to advertise mpeg storage on compactflash, but all it will do for you is 8 frames/sec, which is
worthless. They have an out-dated encoder and scrape the bottom of the mpeg spec.
Disclaimer: I know the people of autoxcam and chasecam, and I would stand to gain if a person
bought a picture-in-picture unit that I'm responsible for
#25
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: W. Palm Beach & Annapolis
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes
on
16 Posts
Wow. Thanks for all the great input but lets boil this down to the non techie people like myself. If you were installing a Video system that was user friendly but had easy to operate and quality results say in the $500. or $1500, range what would they be (for those two sytem budgets).
Thanks again!
Thanks again!
#26
You'd be surprised the quality acheivable with just a Sony MiniDV camera and simple mount.
I literally have a $25 tripod head attached to the rollbar with a hose clamp. The camera does
a very good job stabilizing the image. Check out below for an example of a rough ride.
http://www.trackvision.net/gallery/v...Point_DL90.wmv
I literally have a $25 tripod head attached to the rollbar with a hose clamp. The camera does
a very good job stabilizing the image. Check out below for an example of a rough ride.
http://www.trackvision.net/gallery/v...Point_DL90.wmv
#27
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JackOlsen
Why hasn't someone made a camcorder that eliminates any recording system that involves moving parts? Or better yet, why isn't there a simple video recorder that can take a signal from a $150 lipstick camera and pipe the video directly into a Compact Flash or Secure Digital chip? Seems like it would be cheaper to manufacture, and infinitely lighter.
ChaseCam (a manufacturer of bullet cams) has been trying to design and build a unit for about half a year now, took a few orders a while back and have yet to deliver.
#28
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm looking into this also Bill. One of the options I am considering is an Archos DVR with a Helmet Camera camera on the roll bar. Here are the links.
http://www.archos.com/products/photo...duct_list.html
http://www.helmetcamera.com/
I am still researching this so I am not sure how this will work out. But it looks promising. A RaceCam type setup for $500-600 rather than the $1500. Plus I *should* be able to upgrade to the RaceCam when/if I decide to later (using the Helmet Cam as a foot camera or something...).
My $0.02
http://www.archos.com/products/photo...duct_list.html
http://www.helmetcamera.com/
I am still researching this so I am not sure how this will work out. But it looks promising. A RaceCam type setup for $500-600 rather than the $1500. Plus I *should* be able to upgrade to the RaceCam when/if I decide to later (using the Helmet Cam as a foot camera or something...).
My $0.02
#30