Low Cost Complete Data Acquisition System
#1
Low Cost Complete Data Acquisition System
Guys:
Here is what I am up to. I am talking with the people at AimSport in Italy. I am trying to convince them to write a link to our car’s CAN bus. If they do this, you can have all the instrumentation you reasonably need without having to hardwire all the different sensors (at costs well over $15k), including 4 wheel speeds, rpm, gear, lat g, long g, yaw rate, throttle position, steering angle, and probably all of the engine parameters also, like oil temp, oil pressure, intake charge temp, boost (for turbos), water temp, etc., etc., etc.
The AimSport DAS costs about $2,000 and you get an extremely complete, fully instrumented DAS that has video capability. The system should apply to all 996’s (and Boxters) with PSM, not the GT-3’s or GT-2’s. The recommended system is the MXL Pista.
Here is the link to AimSport http://www.aim-sportline.com/
Please indicate how serious you are interested by responding to this post.
Here is what I am up to. I am talking with the people at AimSport in Italy. I am trying to convince them to write a link to our car’s CAN bus. If they do this, you can have all the instrumentation you reasonably need without having to hardwire all the different sensors (at costs well over $15k), including 4 wheel speeds, rpm, gear, lat g, long g, yaw rate, throttle position, steering angle, and probably all of the engine parameters also, like oil temp, oil pressure, intake charge temp, boost (for turbos), water temp, etc., etc., etc.
The AimSport DAS costs about $2,000 and you get an extremely complete, fully instrumented DAS that has video capability. The system should apply to all 996’s (and Boxters) with PSM, not the GT-3’s or GT-2’s. The recommended system is the MXL Pista.
Here is the link to AimSport http://www.aim-sportline.com/
Please indicate how serious you are interested by responding to this post.
#2
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Very nice and well worth the effort! But I'm afraid I've got no computers on any of my own cars, so no real use for this... Oh well...
#3
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ColorChange
... 996’s (and Boxters) with PSM...
#5
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ColorChange
Guys:
Here is what I am up to. I am talking with the people at AimSport in Italy. I am trying to convince them to write a link to our car’s CAN bus. If they do this, you can have all the instrumentation you reasonably need without having to hardwire all the different sensors (at costs well over $15k), including 4 wheel speeds, rpm, gear, lat g, long g, yaw rate, throttle position, steering angle, and probably all of the engine parameters also, like oil temp, oil pressure, intake charge temp, boost (for turbos), water temp, etc., etc., etc.
The AimSport DAS costs about $2,000 and you get an extremely complete, fully instrumented DAS that has video capability. The system should apply to all 996’s (and Boxters) with PSM, not the GT-3’s or GT-2’s. The recommended system is the MXL Pista.
Here is the link to AimSport http://www.aim-sportline.com/
Please indicate how serious you are interested by responding to this post.
Here is what I am up to. I am talking with the people at AimSport in Italy. I am trying to convince them to write a link to our car’s CAN bus. If they do this, you can have all the instrumentation you reasonably need without having to hardwire all the different sensors (at costs well over $15k), including 4 wheel speeds, rpm, gear, lat g, long g, yaw rate, throttle position, steering angle, and probably all of the engine parameters also, like oil temp, oil pressure, intake charge temp, boost (for turbos), water temp, etc., etc., etc.
The AimSport DAS costs about $2,000 and you get an extremely complete, fully instrumented DAS that has video capability. The system should apply to all 996’s (and Boxters) with PSM, not the GT-3’s or GT-2’s. The recommended system is the MXL Pista.
Here is the link to AimSport http://www.aim-sportline.com/
Please indicate how serious you are interested by responding to this post.
In your conversations with them, did they indicate they could do this? Not to sound too skeptical, but my understanding is that Porsche is pretty tight about their ECU as they (like Mercedes) apparently make a lot of money selling analysis tools to shops. I've only glanced at the CAN protocol, but I didn't see that there were standard definitions for the data crossing the wire, it looked like a pretty dumb transport protocol to me, which likely means a reverse engineering job to actually understand whats on the wire. I presume if CAN had standard definitions it would apply to a wide range of cars, it'd be easy, and likely be already done.
But hell, as a Pista owner I'd love to see them do it even if I can't take advantage of it today.
#6
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Jupiter
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been told that Race-Tech is working on the same thing right now.
Curious which of the parameters you think really useful for the purpose of examining one's driving (vs. analysing the car's performance)?
For me, the list would include:
* RPM
* Throttle position
Lat/long g-loads are provided by the unit and not available on the CAN-bus.
Gear selection can be derived from RPM and speed.
What does yaw rate tell you? Ditto steering angle?
So that leaves only two inputs to be taken from the car (RPM and throttle position).
Of the two, RPM is the more critical. I haven’t looked into this enough to be definitive about it, but I think that RPM is very easy to get from the OBD-ii interface.
I’ve looked into it a little on another car and for that the throttle position is available on one of the inputs to the ECU. Is it not the same for the Porsche?
So although it would be nice to have it all served up in a CAN-bus interface, I wonder if it is really that big of a deal to get the data that is needed?
Stephen
Curious which of the parameters you think really useful for the purpose of examining one's driving (vs. analysing the car's performance)?
For me, the list would include:
* RPM
* Throttle position
Lat/long g-loads are provided by the unit and not available on the CAN-bus.
Gear selection can be derived from RPM and speed.
What does yaw rate tell you? Ditto steering angle?
So that leaves only two inputs to be taken from the car (RPM and throttle position).
Of the two, RPM is the more critical. I haven’t looked into this enough to be definitive about it, but I think that RPM is very easy to get from the OBD-ii interface.
I’ve looked into it a little on another car and for that the throttle position is available on one of the inputs to the ECU. Is it not the same for the Porsche?
So although it would be nice to have it all served up in a CAN-bus interface, I wonder if it is really that big of a deal to get the data that is needed?
Stephen
#7
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FixedWing
I've been told that Race-Tech is working on the same thing right now.
Curious which of the parameters you think really useful for the purpose of examining one's driving (vs. analysing the car's performance)?
For me, the list would include:
* RPM
* Throttle position
Lat/long g-loads are provided by the unit and not available on the CAN-bus.
Gear selection can be derived from RPM and speed.
What does yaw rate tell you? Ditto steering angle?
So that leaves only two inputs to be taken from the car (RPM and throttle position).
Of the two, RPM is the more critical. I haven’t looked into this enough to be definitive about it, but I think that RPM is very easy to get from the OBD-ii interface.
I’ve looked into it a little on another car and for that the throttle position is available on one of the inputs to the ECU. Is it not the same for the Porsche?
So although it would be nice to have it all served up in a CAN-bus interface, I wonder if it is really that big of a deal to get the data that is needed?
Stephen
Curious which of the parameters you think really useful for the purpose of examining one's driving (vs. analysing the car's performance)?
For me, the list would include:
* RPM
* Throttle position
Lat/long g-loads are provided by the unit and not available on the CAN-bus.
Gear selection can be derived from RPM and speed.
What does yaw rate tell you? Ditto steering angle?
So that leaves only two inputs to be taken from the car (RPM and throttle position).
Of the two, RPM is the more critical. I haven’t looked into this enough to be definitive about it, but I think that RPM is very easy to get from the OBD-ii interface.
I’ve looked into it a little on another car and for that the throttle position is available on one of the inputs to the ECU. Is it not the same for the Porsche?
So although it would be nice to have it all served up in a CAN-bus interface, I wonder if it is really that big of a deal to get the data that is needed?
Stephen
If you saw the MS video from the BBC referenced in the recent thread opn DAS, I think you'd agree that throttle is certainly as important as anything from a driver improvement standpoint. Sadly the video had no brake trace which would have been extremely interesting, particularly if it showed any left foot braking. The vid also included a steering trace, which made me think that someday I'd like to add that sensor as its highly indicitive of how the driver is dealing with the current state of the car.
Things like speed sensors on all four wheels can tell you a bunch of interesting stuff, particularly brake lockup, drift etc. It would be very nice if you could buy a unit that would largely just plug and play with the car. The time and expensive of installing the logger, depending on how much info you wish to capture can easily exceed the price of the basic hardware. As the AIM will capture 64 digital channels, it would be a lot easier, and cheaper if it could read the digital data rather than the sensors; you could pick and choose what you want to look at from there.
Trending Topics
#8
Rjay: Nice job. One real neat use of steeering angle is to plot steering angle versus lat g's. This gives a good indication of how you are handling the car with regard to oversteer/understeer and set-up changes.
#9
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
The only parameters listed above that are PSM-specific are: lateral g's, yaw rate, and steering angle. Perhaps brake pressure too, though I wouldn't expect that it's necessarily sent out on the bus. The rest should be available even without PSM, and I would expect be available (if on the bus) from the ABS ECU and the engine/trans ECU(s). Then it's just the question of CAN id's.
CAN id's tend to be fairly standard within manufacturers - after all, why reinvent the wheels. I expect that different Porsches of the same vintage would have very similar if not identical CAN message matrices. Of course looking at a GM, or Ford, or whatever, in contrast would be completely confusing, I'd expect it to be totally different.
If AIM's really wise about this, they'll develop the technology to tap in to ANY CAN bus - and just leave the message list open to editing/adjustment by the end user. Or maybe they already have that - I don't know - and all this is really looking for is a new AIM unit that will rely virtually entirely on that?
CC's absolutely right about the usage of steering angle, yaw rate, and lateral g's - this is what the entire PSM algorithm is based around, in addition to wheel speeds and such. You'd simply mimic some of those calculations in your measurement/data display, and review.
CAN id's tend to be fairly standard within manufacturers - after all, why reinvent the wheels. I expect that different Porsches of the same vintage would have very similar if not identical CAN message matrices. Of course looking at a GM, or Ford, or whatever, in contrast would be completely confusing, I'd expect it to be totally different.
If AIM's really wise about this, they'll develop the technology to tap in to ANY CAN bus - and just leave the message list open to editing/adjustment by the end user. Or maybe they already have that - I don't know - and all this is really looking for is a new AIM unit that will rely virtually entirely on that?
CC's absolutely right about the usage of steering angle, yaw rate, and lateral g's - this is what the entire PSM algorithm is based around, in addition to wheel speeds and such. You'd simply mimic some of those calculations in your measurement/data display, and review.
#10
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ColorChange
One real neat use of steeering angle is to plot steering angle versus lat g's. This gives a good indication of how you are handling the car with regard to oversteer/understeer and set-up changes.
Perhaps this is the thing I'm most excited about with the installation of my unit is the ability to go out to a test and tune day, make a few set up changes and then see the precise effect on the car. I'm sure the guessing about setup will never entirely go away, but at least the results will always be precisely measured assuming I can develop some consistency. Even if I'm a lumox and don't improve at least the car will
#11
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 924RACR
CAN id's tend to be fairly standard within manufacturers - after all, why reinvent the wheels. I expect that different Porsches of the same vintage would have very similar if not identical CAN message matrices. Of course looking at a GM, or Ford, or whatever, in contrast would be completely confusing, I'd expect it to be totally different.
If AIM's really wise about this, they'll develop the technology to tap in to ANY CAN bus - and just leave the message list open to editing/adjustment by the end user. Or maybe they already have that - I don't know - and all this is really looking for is a new AIM unit that will rely virtually entirely on that?.
The other cool possibility I would look into if I were running AIM is the possibility of OEMing the logger to BMW or Porsche who would then intergrate into the car and make it available as a factory option at least for RS/CS and CSL kind of models. Who they hell wants a GPS when you could use that center console screen for lap times eh? I refuse to pay $2k to know where I am, but to figure out how fast I managed to get there...priceless.
#13
I am extremely interested in this. I have heard of this possibility. What exactly is the CAN bus? Perhaps it would not be too difficult to get an engineer buddy to moonlight make us a connector? What is involved?
#14
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
The CAN bus is the car's communications network for ECU's - think Car LAN, you'll have the right concept. All the messages between the various computers in the car pass on this network. But more specifically, CAN is a particular architecture for that network (standard originally developed by Bosch, as I understand); there are other architectures as well (which don't typically work quite as well), GM's ClassII being but one example. Some vehicles also can have not one but two CAN busses, completely separate networks.
The really fun stuff happens when you've got two separate and incompatible networks in one car. Kinda like having a Mac and a PC network in one building! LOL
The really fun stuff happens when you've got two separate and incompatible networks in one car. Kinda like having a Mac and a PC network in one building! LOL
#15
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Jupiter
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ColorChange
One real neat use of steeering angle is to plot steering angle versus lat g's. This gives a good indication of how you are handling the car with regard to oversteer/understeer and set-up changes.
From my perspective, there are two seperate uses for the data. The first is in analysing the driver and the decisions he makes. The second is to analyse the car and how well the car is tuned for conditions.
I believe that much of the data people are talking about seems to relate to tuning the car and not to the driver. I think that is true for the steering angle.
I think that there is a real risk in being burried in data. From the driver's perspective, only a very little information related to the decisions he is making are needed.
Whether the driver is setting the car up correctly for a corner is probably something best judged by the seat of the pants. This should be obvious. And I think it can be judged much better this way than through an analysis of data after the fact.
Stephen