Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

SC2 vs NT01

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2018, 03:24 AM
  #1  
matt33
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
matt33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 453
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
Default SC2 vs NT01

I’m currently running SC2’s on a 997.1 GT3RS. As much as I like the tires, I don’t like that they heat cycle out well ahead of tread wear which for me means I don’t know when to replace them (drive to track/no trailer so can’t simply swap wheels when they go).

Interested in opinions: is switching to NT01 just an easier and more predictable wear cycle? Pros/cons?

I am not concerned about 1-2 secs, don’t need wet weather performance, and am running 305/30/19” and 235/35/19”.

Thanks
Matty
Old 04-29-2018, 03:35 AM
  #2  
adi_d
Racer
 
adi_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matt33
I’m currently running SC2’s on a 997.1 GT3RS. As much as I like the tires, I don’t like that they heat cycle out well ahead of tread wear which for me means I don’t know when to replace them (drive to track/no trailer so can’t simply swap wheels when they go).

Interested in opinions: is switching to NT01 just an easier and more predictable wear cycle? Pros/cons?

I am not concerned about 1-2 secs, don’t need wet weather performance, and am running 305/30/19” and 235/35/19”.

Thanks
Matty
I used both on my 997.2 GT3 with 18 and 19 wheels. The time difference between the two is probably less than .5 seconds, so performance wise on track almost identical. NT01 are far more cost effective (~$1100 a set vs. ~1600 on cup2). NT01 is also a lot less sensitive to temperature differences and can be fairly consistent throughout the session. On the flip side NT01 is horrible on the street, like sitting in a drum, and useless in rain. Again, from my experience both would heat cycle out well before cords, with NT01 lasting a bit longer (20-25 HCs vs. 15-20 on cup2). Of course this is all dependent on how fast you go and how hard you push your car. Essentially NT01 is more cost effective while cup2 is a newer and better tire.

From what I can see these days, most people go for the Bridgestone RE71R, which has cost effectiveness of NT01 and sophistication of Cup2.
Old 04-29-2018, 11:24 AM
  #3  
Difool
Rennlist Member
 
Difool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 768
Received 141 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I read, that MC2 don’t actually heat cycle out. They have a harder rubber layer under the soft good stuff and if you know what to look for you can see the different layers once you wear into them. That matches my experience, and yeah, after a few days they fall off. For a street/track car that probably makes sense, in that you will always have a decent street tire to drive home on. For the track it makes for an expensive tire budget. Could almost be running R7s (trailering obviously). I didn’t particularly love the MC2s. I liked the RE71Rs better, by quite a bit. They are as sticky, if not more so, and also good on the street, although they make funny noises when driving over tar patches

i also am am liking the R888R tires better than NT01, for equivalent performance (both a step down from MC2 and RE71r). But all this is pretty subjective.
Old 04-29-2018, 03:19 PM
  #4  
matt33
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
matt33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 453
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Have you both found the RE71R to be more consistent through the tread life than the SC2?

Not knowing when the SC2 is going to start falling off is the real issue I have. At $1600 a go, I cant say replacing them too early excites me, but at the same time having confidence they will be somewhat consistent through the next track day is also important. Very tricky!

Thanks for sharing your experiences.

Matty
Old 04-29-2018, 03:36 PM
  #5  
Difool
Rennlist Member
 
Difool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 768
Received 141 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I found the RE71R tires to be pretty consistent through their life. If they have a weakness it's heat. Overcook them and it's hard to cool them down, and if you don't they will wear very quickly.
Old 04-29-2018, 03:47 PM
  #6  
matt33
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
matt33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 453
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Interesting. And what pressure do you target hot on the RE71R? With the SC2 I am targeting 32F/34R and found they get greasy quickly at just a few PSI higher than that.
Old 04-29-2018, 05:36 PM
  #7  
multi21
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
multi21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,125
Received 3,541 Likes on 2,106 Posts
Default

Before I started to trailer, I would drive to the track on the NT01 and although loud, they were fine and never cycled out. In fact, they got better and better as they got down to the cords. I've got a set of R888R that I'm trying out now and they seem to be equal to the NT01 so far, but haven't use them up yet. The old 888 would horrible and would cycle out with half the tread still on the tire. Can't speak to the RE71 as they don't make sizes for my car but have heard great things about them.
Old 04-30-2018, 11:10 AM
  #8  
gman3280
Pro
 
gman3280's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 700
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matt33
Interesting. And what pressure do you target hot on the RE71R? With the SC2 I am targeting 32F/34R and found they get greasy quickly at just a few PSI higher than that.
I'm running the 71's on my CS. 19's in stock sizes. They grip well but they don't handle heat and that causes the pressures to spike on track significantly. I'll start out at 27 psi and I pull off when they get to 40+psi. This is in a 20 minute session.
Old 04-30-2018, 08:40 PM
  #9  
Difool
Rennlist Member
 
Difool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 768
Received 141 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

When I was running RE71r (I’ve since switched to R7s) I targeted about 32 hot. Would start at about 27 cold and then bleed aggressively.
Old 05-01-2018, 12:10 PM
  #10  
alexaqui
Racer
 
alexaqui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 492
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

On a lighter car (E36) I've had good luck targeting 37/38 psi hot. Any lower and they would roll over the edges (Bridgestone has the markers on the sides to indicate where that is). If you do not overdrive the tire they are very predictable and seem to last a long time (e.g., have seen people take them down to the cords).
Old 05-01-2018, 01:17 PM
  #11  
breljohn
Burning Brakes
 
breljohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 776
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Before I switched to slicks, I was running NT01s.
Amazing tire
Old 05-01-2018, 01:20 PM
  #12  
PhillyGT3
Rennlist Member
 
PhillyGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 206
Received 51 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

on my 997.1 Gt3, I target 29 front and 32 rear (245/35/19 and 305/35/19) and it seems to work well on my SC2s. I will say that after 20-22 sessions, I need to replace them as I feel like they have heat cycled out. This is a first for me as the treads seem fine.

I feel your pain I guess is what I am trying to say!?



Quick Reply: SC2 vs NT01



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:25 AM.