If no diesel in the USA
#17
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For now atleast the 4 cyl Macan plans for the US have been put aside. The reason is simple. Porsche has limited production capacity at the moment compared to demand for the Macan. It makes no real business sense to certify another engine for the US (a typically power hungry, somewhat mpg insensitive market) and then charge less for the car. If and when the production catches up with supply in the future, expect Porsche to bring some form of 4 cyl Macan to the US market. Whether that is with the MMC or second generation Macan 7 years from now is anyone's guess.
#18
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Porsche would want to use a 4-cylinder gasoline engine in its sports cars only if it needed to respond to a spike in fuel prices. The Boxster/Cayman don'e even offer 4-cylinder models, and they weigh significantly less. In any event, worldwide economic sluggishness (not a bad thing, actually) has held down the price of oil, so it doesn't appear to be likely that Porsche would need to take drastic measures to achieve better fuel economy within the current generation Macan lifecycle. More likely, Porsche would adapt a compact VW/Audi 4-cylinder for use in a future Macan hybrid, which is probably several years away and will be designed for 918-like performance instead of fuel economy.
#19
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Base Macan with the four cylinder (1984cc, 235hp) is on the Beijing Motorshow. Will probably hit the European and North american market in the last quarter of this year.
http://club.autohome.com.cn/bbs/thre...9392551-1.html
The Boxster will get a flat-4 with the facelift at the end of 2015. Rumours are that even the next gen 911 could be offered with a flat-4 (although they should name it a 912 in that case I guess)
SQ5 and Macan S are indeed pretty similar in performance (both in US and Europe, where the SQ5 is a Diesel). OTOH, the SQ5 is Audi's top of the range Q5, where as the Macan S is the "base" 6 cylinder Macan. Macan is more aimed to be a sporty SUV with less practicallity. The SQ5 is a practical SUV with a slightly more sporty appearance and a tweaked suspension.
Suzy (via iOS app)
http://club.autohome.com.cn/bbs/thre...9392551-1.html
The Boxster will get a flat-4 with the facelift at the end of 2015. Rumours are that even the next gen 911 could be offered with a flat-4 (although they should name it a 912 in that case I guess)
SQ5 and Macan S are indeed pretty similar in performance (both in US and Europe, where the SQ5 is a Diesel). OTOH, the SQ5 is Audi's top of the range Q5, where as the Macan S is the "base" 6 cylinder Macan. Macan is more aimed to be a sporty SUV with less practicallity. The SQ5 is a practical SUV with a slightly more sporty appearance and a tweaked suspension.
Suzy (via iOS app)
#20
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The specs for the 2.0 base Macan are up on the UK website
http://www.porsche.com/uk/models/mac...turesandspecs/
Suzy (via iOS app)
http://www.porsche.com/uk/models/mac...turesandspecs/
Suzy (via iOS app)
#22
Drifting
#24
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Could there ever be a business case for Audi and Porsche to offer practically identical capability vehicles, with near-identical powertrains? Some of us are puzzled that Audi released the SQ5 at the same time Porsche rolled out the Macan S. The market may be growing, but it seems foolish for sister companies to be fighting for the same market space.
#26
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Based on what we've read, I don't think we see the 2.0 in the US.
#27
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Was in Germany last week on a business trip and managed to visit a Porsche dealership. They had a Macan in the showroom so I managed to check it out more thoroughly than I did at the auto show. I despise Urban Assault Vehicles... uh, SUVs, but I am seriously considering the Macan.
#28
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The specs for the 2.0 base Macan are up on the UK website
http://www.porsche.com/uk/models/mac...turesandspecs/
Suzy (via iOS app)
http://www.porsche.com/uk/models/mac...turesandspecs/
Suzy (via iOS app)
They have it for the Cayenne but not for the "sporty" Macan ?!
Just another lame automatic SUV
![grr](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/cussing.gif)
#29
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A manual has nothing to do with a car being sporty or not. Unless you think that cars like Ferrari 458, McLaren 650S, Pagani Huyara, Lamborghini Huracán are lame as well.
Suzy (via iOS app)
#30
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I drove a manual cayenne once as a loaner, apparently the only one in the country. It was truly a forgettable experience. I can totally understand why a manual in the Macan would be a very special order.....like a special needs type of order.