Notices
Macan 2014-Current
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

Macan S vs GTS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2026 | 10:29 PM
  #1  
daniely's Avatar
daniely
Thread Starter
3rd Gear
 
Joined: Feb 2026
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default Macan S vs GTS

I'm looking onto getting a Macan. Can't decide if I should go with the S or GTS. Would like to hear people's thoughts and experiences from ownership
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2026 | 12:26 AM
  #2  
atwnsw's Avatar
atwnsw
Track Day
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 3
Default

If money isn't a concern, get the GTS. Personally, I couldn't justify the difference in price so settled on the S. I live in a city so hardly ever drive the car over 40mph except for some occasional highway driving.

Before I had a 2015 Turbo with 400 hp. The S is now 375 hp and GTS is around 430 hp. The same engine in both.

Either way, great car.

The other issue to consider is how long you will keep it.

The GTS will depreciate less initially because there is more demand and fewer supply.




Reply
Old Feb 5, 2026 | 10:39 PM
  #3  
DHL's Avatar
DHL
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 394
Default

Originally Posted by daniely
I'm looking onto getting a Macan. Can't decide if I should go with the S or GTS. Would like to hear people's thoughts and experiences from ownership
GTS cost more but is rarer. Comes standard with performance options that are options on the S. If you are performance biased like me, you can never have enough power so GTS. Yes you can "tune" the S to the same levels or more, but I prefer to keep my cars stock while under warranty. The PSCB (surface coated brakes) are awesome in hauling down these heavy SUVs and essential IMHO. They are stock on the GTS optional on the S.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2026 | 04:33 AM
  #4  
MSCA's Avatar
MSCA
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 1,431
From: Monte Sereno, CA
Default

GTS is a better car than an S in everything, if you remove money from the equation.

Sure it costs more, but it has its own cult following and is in high demand in the used car market, so doesn’t really cost that much more in the long run.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2026 | 12:31 PM
  #5  
boyce89976's Avatar
boyce89976
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 331
Likes: 177
Default

Originally Posted by MSCA
GTS is a better car than an S in everything, if you remove money from the equation.

Sure it costs more, but it has its own cult following and is in high demand in the used car market, so doesn’t really cost that much more in the long run.
That's a bold statement!

OP, I went through this exercise a couple years ago and went with a highly optioned S because it was the best value compared to the GTS. You can option the S close to the GTS for about $10k less. Real world performance is almost identical... the important performance factors are very close to each other - weight (GTS weighs 50lbs more), torque (20lb-ft difference), tire size, suspension, 0-60 time (GTS 0.3 seconds faster). The S with PASM, Sport Chrono, Sport Exhaust and PTV is a very capable SUV.

If you want the look of the GTS, don't mind the race-tex interior (or spending an extra $4k for leather), want the extra horsepower (which you'll likely never use), go with the GTS.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2026 | 01:08 PM
  #6  
TTG's Avatar
TTG
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 474
Likes: 158
From: PNW
Default

By the time I built the S the way we wanted, GTS became a no brainier.

@boyce89976 , leather is standard on GTS and you have an option between RaceTex or leather free of charge.

On S, leather is a $1800 option and full leather is a $6k option with stitching. GTS, you can option for full leather w/ stitching for $4k.

GTS also comes with PSCB's which you can not option an S with. (jury is out weather they are worth the hassle down the road when it comes to replacement)

Last edited by TTG; Feb 9, 2026 at 01:20 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2026 | 01:45 PM
  #7  
boyce89976's Avatar
boyce89976
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 331
Likes: 177
Default

Originally Posted by TTG
@boyce89976 , leather is standard on GTS and you have an option between RaceTex or leather free of charge.
If you add the GTS Sport Package, it doesn't look like you can get leather w/out race-tex according to the configurator. I would assume if you're getting the GTS, the GTS Sport Package would be the way to go rather than adding all of the options individually?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2026 | 02:05 PM
  #8  
TTG's Avatar
TTG
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 474
Likes: 158
From: PNW
Default

Originally Posted by boyce89976
If you add the GTS Sport Package, it doesn't look like you can get leather w/out race-tex according to the configurator. I would assume if you're getting the GTS, the GTS Sport Package would be the way to go rather than adding all of the options individually?
Correct on the GTS Sports Package - which is mainly all cosmetic besides Sport Chrono and PTV. This is an option we left out as PTV is no use for this car's grocery duties, Mrs wanted to chose her own styling along with wheel choice. Also, summer only tires that GTS Sports pack comes with was also a deal breaker.

If you do not click on that option, it appears there is more flexibility

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2026 | 03:47 PM
  #9  
Risky_Business's Avatar
Risky_Business
Pro
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 648
Likes: 526
From: Barred Spiral Galaxy
Default

Originally Posted by DHL
GTS cost more but is rarer. Comes standard with performance options that are options on the S. If you are performance biased like me, you can never have enough power so GTS. Yes you can "tune" the S to the same levels or more, but I prefer to keep my cars stock while under warranty. The PSCB (surface coated brakes) are awesome in hauling down these heavy SUVs and essential IMHO. They are stock on the GTS optional on the S.
Good points here and I had similar thoughts. My 2026 GTS lock is imminent.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2026 | 04:35 AM
  #10  
MSCA's Avatar
MSCA
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 1,431
From: Monte Sereno, CA
Default

Originally Posted by boyce89976
That's a bold statement!

OP, I went through this exercise a couple years ago and went with a highly optioned S because it was the best value compared to the GTS. You can option the S close to the GTS for about $10k less. Real world performance is almost identical... the important performance factors are very close to each other - weight (GTS weighs 50lbs more), torque (20lb-ft difference), tire size, suspension, 0-60 time (GTS 0.3 seconds faster). The S with PASM, Sport Chrono, Sport Exhaust and PTV is a very capable SUV.

If you want the look of the GTS, don't mind the race-tex interior (or spending an extra $4k for leather), want the extra horsepower (which you'll likely never use), go with the GTS.
As I said, if you take money out of the equation!!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2026 | 03:31 PM
  #11  
Greg2010's Avatar
Greg2010
Racer
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 126
From: Southern California
Default

As others have said, more available options, higher demand, and lower depreciation is a no-brainer for a modestly optioned "GTS" versus a highly optioned "S".photo743.jpg

Last edited by Greg2010; Feb 10, 2026 at 03:48 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2026 | 12:54 AM
  #12  
MSCA's Avatar
MSCA
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 1,431
From: Monte Sereno, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Greg2010
As others have said, more available options, higher demand, and lower depreciation is a no-brainer for a modestly optioned "GTS" versus a highly optioned "S".Attachment 1386049
You nailed it on the cost of ownership front - GTS depreciates less than an S by a good margin!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2026 | 10:02 AM
  #13  
Waterloo's Avatar
Waterloo
Advanced
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 80
Likes: 31
Default

My wife just traded in her Tesla model Y for a Macan S. We test drove both the S and the GTS. For her, the GTS was way too high strung. More aggressive in looks, handling, power, sound, and feel. The seats were tightly bolstered and stiff. The S was more elegant and comfortable yet still quick and handles well. She loves the S. I don't particularly like it but it's growing on me. If it was for me I would 100% get the GTS.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2026 | 11:03 AM
  #14  
ShiftyWolf's Avatar
ShiftyWolf
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 643
Likes: 336
From: Central Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Waterloo
My wife just traded in her Tesla model Y for a Macan S. We test drove both the S and the GTS. For her, the GTS was way too high strung. More aggressive in looks, handling, power, sound, and feel. The seats were tightly bolstered and stiff.
The seat comfort is not related to trim but rather the design (14 way vs 18 way seats). My wife liked the 18 way but they are definitely sportier and a recommended "try before you buy" option.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2026 | 11:29 AM
  #15  
Waterloo's Avatar
Waterloo
Advanced
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 80
Likes: 31
Default

Originally Posted by ShiftyWolf
The seat comfort is not related to trim but rather the design (14 way vs 18 way seats). My wife liked the 18 way but they are definitely sportier and a recommended "try before you buy" option.
Good point. For what it's worth I believe the seats in the car we drove were the 8 way Sport seats. She really likes the 14 way in her S. I really liked the 8 way sport seats.
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:53 PM.