Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder

Ceramic Brakes VS. Regular Brakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 12:22 AM
  #46  
FORENN's Avatar
FORENN
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,650
Likes: 669
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
No one, at this point, knows the replacement rate and costs of the Gen 3 PCCBs.

Everyone who says they are more expensive to use on track than iron rotors are basing their calculus on the Gen 2 PCCBs.
I didn't state otherwise. I was just reporting what I've read over the years here on rennlist. And perception/belief of replacement cost is more the issue. But it doesn't matter to me. If you like ceramics more, go nuts. I will stick with steels for the various reasons I listed. Although I'm happy to have ceramics "for free" on my turbo S.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 01:36 AM
  #47  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Likes: 3,919
Default

Easy solution is to just drive both and see which you like better. I'd never go steel again if I was ordering a car. YMMV of course.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 03:26 AM
  #48  
KingSize.Hamster's Avatar
KingSize.Hamster
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 942
Likes: 374
From: Hong Kong
Default

Originally Posted by jphughan
Where did you read that? I've seen the exact opposite, and that's been reiterated twice (three times?) in this thread.
Pete literally wrote that a few threads above ... but yes, Walter did change his opinion. He did mention about 7 years ago that he would always spec his cars with PCCBs. That said, it could be due to the factors I outlined earlier on how steel vs PCCB brakes were quite different even in their rotor size + 2 fewer pistons on non-GT cars back then.

Don't get me wrong. I might even spec PCCBs on my own car soon. All I'm saying is, the PCCBs are more for brake dust + advantage of more resistant to fading but only much more extreme track conditions beyond 25 mins sessions + the bling factor. I'm aware of the the fact that the perceived lightness and increased stopping power are indeed not the case in reality. From talking to guys who track their cars regularly, it doesn't look like their lap times are actually anything noticeable coming from brakes alone.

Last edited by KingSize.Hamster; Oct 8, 2015 at 04:17 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 05:22 AM
  #49  
hellboy_mcqueen's Avatar
hellboy_mcqueen
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 540
Likes: 36
From: Earth
Default

Originally Posted by Alpha.GT4
PCCB brakes are not race grade brakes. Just because LeMans cars runs ceramic brakes doesn't necessarily mean Porsche is giving you the same brakes for road cars. Again and again, PCCB brakes make you feel the car brakes better simply because of the brake pedal feel. I don't think there is any argument that PCCBs feel different, just that the argument is whether they are worth it for people who care about spending the 8K for the feel + no brake dust yet with no real world braking power improvement. Ceramic brakes will be more resistant to fade on the track under extended periods of use. However, from guys who run their GT3s on the track, the don't seem to experience any noticeable different while running 25 mins sessions. Perhaps the difference is there if you do 45 mins+? But then who actually does that? Not that many people. On top of that, the heat dissipation and marginal weight difference could be achieved by putting in floating discs into the red brakes during brake rotor change ...
Some additional points:

Racing applications are actually changing based on the budget.
Ferrari Challenge is using Carbon/Ceramic, but the F1 is using Carbon/Carbon applications. Not sure about the GT3 cup. I think they are using iron.

Carbon/Carbons provide much better deceleration, but they do function between 350-1000 degree celcius, which you not would reach this temp range during city driving. And it has a life of 800km.

Hence, they come up with a solution where they form the disc core with carbon and coat with silicon carbide (Carbon fibre-reinforced silicon carbide = C/SiC). It also functions with the regular temp range, lighter and has a good heat dissipation. But the life gets significantly shorter with track usage.

http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...ic-brakes.html

“This feature means that the wear resistance of Carbon Ceramic Material guarantees an approximate disc life of 150,000 km (93,000 miles) for road use and 2,000 km (2,400 miles) for extreme track use (e.g. Ferrari Challenge),” Michelini said.
And here is the company making refurbishment on Ceramic/Carbon discs
http://www.ceramicdiscrefurbishment.com/home

Last edited by hellboy_mcqueen; Oct 8, 2015 at 03:10 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 09:42 AM
  #50  
Ochocoronas's Avatar
Ochocoronas
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 578
Likes: 1
Default

According to the GT4 database 75% of GT4 buyers got steel brakes.

Buying cost did not play a role in this lopsided % it was the replacement cost that did it.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 12:34 PM
  #51  
Petevb's Avatar
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 700
Default

Originally Posted by Alpha.GT4
Pete literally wrote that a few threads above ...
Now even I'm confused. WR suggested I skip the PCCBs, not spec them...

Agree on trying both of possible. There is no wrong answer as long as you're aware of the true costs and benefits.

Personally I think if Porsche cut replacement disk sets to no more than the price for the option new they would do themselves a world of good. $22k per set when the new price is $7k is simply malicious. Particularly when you can buy a set of Vette rotors from the same original manufacturer for $5k.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 12:42 PM
  #52  
Petevb's Avatar
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 700
Default

Originally Posted by FelisMalicious
Racing applications are actually changing based on the budget.
Ferrari Challenge is using Carbon/Ceramic, but the F1 is using Carbon/Carbon applications. Not sure about the GT3 cup. I think they are using iron.
Real race cars (not spec series) all use either carbon/carbon or iron. Carbon/ carbon is a completely different technology that has almost nothing in common with carbon/ ceramic.

GT3 Cup uses iron.
GT3 Supercup uses PCCB.
Word is it was normal for Supercup to swap rotors every other race weekend. This was a few years ago with Gen 2 PCCB. I don't think Gen 3 is used on Supercup cars, however: 410mm disks seem incompatible with 18 inch wheels.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 02:49 PM
  #53  
khooni's Avatar
khooni
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 844
Likes: 20
From: UK
Default

i ordered PCCB. this topic has literally been weighing on my mind since I first was allocated a car.

To me, costs are a factor. But, I do get 918 brakes on the cheap and i have absolutely no complaints about the PCCBs on my spyder or RS. The lack of brake dust helps with the silver wheels I ordered and I am going to chance it that the yen 3 discs will last longer and that recent advancements in refurb mean that I don't have to pay the porsche premium tax when that gets replaced.

But, most importantly, I have another track car which uses AP racing hardware on steels. That eats discs every 10 track days. GT4 will be used much less for track.
Reply
Rennlist Stories

The Best Porsche Posts for Porsche Enthusiasts

story-0

Theon Goes Full Carbon Fiber With Stunning New Build

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Six Genius Porsche-Themed Gifts That'll Make Any Dad or Grad Smile

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

10 Used Porsches Are Selling for Way Too Cheap

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Tuner Is Converting Porsche 911s Into Shooting Brakes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

This Coachbuilt Creation Is A Modern Take on the Legendary Porsche 917

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Is This Convertible Cayenne A Steal, Or A Returnless Investment?

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Non-Flat Six Porsches You Can Buy For Under $100K

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

6 Convertible Top MYTHS Most People Don't Understand!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 07:54 PM
  #54  
GAZZ's Avatar
GAZZ
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 565
Likes: 83
From: Australia
Default

I just did a track day in the GT4.
Well, big supprise and big disapointment. Steel brakes are not good compared to PCCB. Really regretting not getting PCCB now.
Tried some late braking and compared to previous 987.2S with PCCB, just no way near the same point and they just dont grab as hard. Had to press really hard to even get ABS to activate.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 09:36 PM
  #55  
jphughan's Avatar
jphughan
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 23
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by GAZZ
I just did a track day in the GT4.
Well, big supprise and big disapointment. Steel brakes are not good compared to PCCB. Really regretting not getting PCCB now.
Tried some late braking and compared to previous 987.2S with PCCB, just no way near the same point and they just dont grab as hard. Had to press really hard to even get ABS to activate.
That sounds like you just prefer more brake assist, which PCCB is known for. That has nothing to do with brake performance or longevity; it's just how the brake booster is set up. Petevb even has an interesting chart showing that Porsches over the decades have consistently gotten more boosted brake pedals over the years even though that's not necessarily a good thing in performance driving scenarios because it can make them more difficult to modulate. Anyhow, yes everything I've read says PCCBs require less pedal effort, and while that is certainly a matter of preference and may for some people even be enough to decide which brakes they'd rather have, I don't think it makes steel inferior.

If you've only got one track day in this car, try keeping an open mind and allowing more of an adjustment period before letting buyer's remorse set in.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 09:50 PM
  #56  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Likes: 3,919
Default

The difference between PCCB and steel is not just the brake booster. The carbon ceramics have more bite. And, IMO, as an owner of both, offer better pedal feel.

Both are great brake systems, but stating the stronger bite of the PCCBs is all boost is wrong.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 10:13 PM
  #57  
ChrisF's Avatar
ChrisF
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 1,506
From: La La Land
Default

Originally Posted by GAZZ
I just did a track day in the GT4.
Well, big supprise and big disapointment. Steel brakes are not good compared to PCCB. Really regretting not getting PCCB now.
Tried some late braking and compared to previous 987.2S with PCCB, just no way near the same point and they just dont grab as hard. Had to press really hard to even get ABS to activate.
I would be shocked to find that stopping distances varied more than a couple of feet between the two. Pedal feel on the other hand may be different.

End of the day, the real difference is in consumable costs. Unless you're a professional driver, I doubt you could exploit the difference in rotating mass, etc. Where's orthojoe when you need him
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 10:31 PM
  #58  
ipse dixit's Avatar
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 18,957
Likes: 15,042
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisF
I would be shocked to find that stopping distances varied more than a couple of feet between the two. Pedal feel on the other hand may be different.

End of the day, the real difference is in consumable costs. Unless you're a professional driver, I doubt you could exploit the difference in rotating mass, etc. Where's orthojoe when you need him
I dunno.

A couple of feet, even one, is kind of a lot on most tracks. Assuming that foot (or feet) difference even remains constant lap after lap after lap.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 10:33 PM
  #59  
Petevb's Avatar
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 700
Default

Originally Posted by GAZZ
I just did a track day in the GT4.
Well, big supprise and big disapointment. Steel brakes are not good compared to PCCB. Really regretting not getting PCCB now.
Tried some late braking and compared to previous 987.2S with PCCB, just no way near the same point and they just dont grab as hard. Had to press really hard to even get ABS to activate.
Easy to get more bite with a pad swap if you prefer a grabby feel. 380 mm cast iron disks are standard issue at Le Mans. They'll get you slowed down, and luckily the pedal feel is highly tunable.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2015 | 11:30 PM
  #60  
vantage's Avatar
vantage
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 402
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

^ yes, lot of pads to choose from with higher initial friction. In meantime, hit the squat rack / calf press at the gym.
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:51 AM.

story-0
Theon Goes Full Carbon Fiber With Stunning New Build

Slideshow: Built around a carbon-bodied 964 and a naturally aspirated 4.0-liter flat-six, this bespoke commission highlights how far the restomod formula has evolved.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-06 14:41:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
Six Genius Porsche-Themed Gifts That'll Make Any Dad or Grad Smile

Slideshow: Six genius gifts that'll make any Dad smile.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-04 04:58:13


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Used Porsches Are Selling for Way Too Cheap

Slideshow: These 10 used Porsches offer more driving thrills than their price would suggest.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:11:13


VIEW MORE
story-3
Tuner Is Converting Porsche 911s Into Shooting Brakes

Slideshow: A Polish Porsche specialist is moving ahead with one of the most unusual 911 conversions in recent memory: a shooting brake version of the 991-generation sports car.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-01 19:46:47


VIEW MORE
story-4
This Coachbuilt Creation Is A Modern Take on the Legendary Porsche 917

Slideshow: A Porsche Carrera GT has been transformed into a one-off coachbuilt machine that blends analog supercar engineering with styling inspired by the legendary 917 race cars.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-01 17:06:04


VIEW MORE
story-5
Is This Convertible Cayenne A Steal, Or A Returnless Investment?

Slideshow: A heavily modified Porsche Cayenne convertible with faux wood trim and a long list of flaws recently sold at auction for surprisingly little money.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-29 18:52:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Non-Flat Six Porsches You Can Buy For Under $100K

Slideshow: If you have $100K to spend on a Porsche but want something a little different, these are the 10 best non-flat six Porsches you can buy.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-28 15:36:11


VIEW MORE
story-7
Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions

Slideshow: For a company obsessed with engineering precision, Porsche has occasionally named its cars in ways that left even loyal enthusiasts scratching their heads.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-27 18:43:48


VIEW MORE
story-8
Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field

Slideshow: Pogea Racing's latest Porsche 964 project blends carbon-fiber construction, modern chassis upgrades, and up to 500 horsepower while keeping the air-cooled 911 experience firmly analog.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-23 10:34:27


VIEW MORE
story-9
6 Convertible Top MYTHS Most People Don't Understand!

Slideshow: dispelling common convertible top myths

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE