Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

Ceramic Brakes VS. Regular Brakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2015, 05:13 AM
  #16  
hellboy_mcqueen
Pro
 
hellboy_mcqueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 540
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4carl
The only reason they may actually stop better is their larger its that simple. I had a GT2 years ago and switched PCCB's to the same size steel and no difference in stopping distance or power on track. UN-sprung weight is the only real benefit and i couldn't feel that.

What i did feel is a heart attack when the dealer told me $13,000 to replace the fronts that were like sandpaper after about 800 track miles(gen 1) .
Lucky i got them to warranty a set. Put them in a box and gave them to the next owner with the car.

There's a reason Cup cars come with steel rotors... carl
Very true.

Braking distance is defined by the tyre nowadays and both steel and PCCBs are oversized in GT4. If you are driving heavy on the brakes, you might feel pccb is better after many appliance. But they cost crazy money; 25% of the car's price.

I read that a Swiss company is now re-coating the silicon carbide on the PCCB discs. But i have not seen any re-coated disc and have not yet read a review.
Old 10-07-2015, 09:32 AM
  #17  
2XIPA
Burning Brakes
 
2XIPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,183
Received 314 Likes on 214 Posts
Default

Anyone ever chip a PCCB while driving? I have and have had paint chips on my calipers.
Old 10-07-2015, 12:59 PM
  #18  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 704 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bhgt2
Yesterday I drove my 911 with PCCBs then jumped into my GT4 with steels. PCCBs feel better, and brake better.
"Better" is quite subjective in this case. It's standard practice to tune for very high brake pedal effort in race cars. This gives the driver better modulation near lockup. Porsche road tuning philosophy used to be closer to this as well, but many customers prefer brakes that require far less effort even if they are not as easy to modulate at the limit. Porsche has therefore reduced pedal effort on their all of their cars over the last couple decades, PCCBs taking this to the extreme. You won't find many pro drivers that would want that low pedal effort tuning in a competition car, however.
Originally Posted by 2XIPA
Anyone ever chip a PCCB while driving? I have and have had paint chips on my calipers.
You're at risk for chips if you go off into a gravel trap.
Old 10-07-2015, 01:08 PM
  #19  
supercup
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
supercup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S. California
Posts: 1,895
Received 80 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

PCCB's on the GT4 are a relative "value" as Porsche prices options based on the Vehicle - not their cost (as noted by Petevb elsewhere). PCCB's on the GT4 are $7,400 (US), 911 (Turbo, GT3 RS etc.) they are $9,210 on the Cayenne they are $8,840.

Same brakes, all three vehicles - but different price! So you they are a value on the GT4, relative to the cost of the GT3 and relative to the cost of the replacement rotors.

Probably should have gotten them, replaced with steel disc and sold the ceramic disc's over time at a nice profit - even at $3,000 each they are far cheaper than the dealer! For someone who needs one you would be a great option!

Just a thought!
Old 10-07-2015, 01:20 PM
  #20  
Alpha.GT4
Racer
 
Alpha.GT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 284
Received 58 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Seems like this is a good test to settle a lot of the thinking that PCCBs actually reduce fade substantially or has shorter stopping distances:

http://m.caranddriver.com/features/the-power-to-stop-performance-cars-page-4

As others have mentioned, the weight savings of PCCBs are not as big as what most would perceive simply looking at the numbers. Worn vs new. And going on floating discs. Of course the article doesn't account for crazy tracking, but that surely gives a pretty good idea of what their performances are in repeated use of braking under that particular scenario.

Often times people feel PCCBs are far superior because of the advertising and also the initial bite. It's like how BMW owners often think their cars have great brakes because BMWs are overboosted at the first part of the brake pedal travel.

Also, I read somewhere on this forum that claimed Walter Rohrl said he would spec his GT4 in steel brakes? Of course I haven't done a fact check on that. If that statement was really made by him, that would be very interesting and actually mean something given his role as a test driver for Porsche AG.
Old 10-07-2015, 01:47 PM
  #21  
multi21
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
multi21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 16,046
Received 2,979 Likes on 1,759 Posts
Default

I had a long discussion with a Brembo engineer 6 months ago about the benefits of steel vs. ceramics. He opined that the ceramics that come directly from the automaker, regardless of brand, are not the highest quality ceramics that can be applied and are not measurably better than the steel brakes -- it's basically a marketing tool and a very high margin mark up that has taken off in upper end brands.

You have to go aftermarket with both rotors and pads to get what is basically a race specific rotor and pad combination to have any significant/measurable benefits when using the same tire.

Given the size of the brakes on the GT4, I don't see the benefit of PCCBs vs. cost of purchase and certainly not replacement.
Old 10-07-2015, 01:57 PM
  #22  
Mc21
Rennlist Member
 
Mc21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 294
Received 22 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

When comes time to replace those ceramic rotors, can you not replace with OEM steel rotors (with proper adapters ofcourse) and still retain those Yellow Calipers?
Not that I would do that but that would cost you the same to replace rotors if you opt not to get ceramics in the future.
Old 10-07-2015, 02:36 PM
  #23  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 704 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alpha.GT4
Also, I read somewhere on this forum that claimed Walter Rohrl said he would spec his GT4 in steel brakes? Of course I haven't done a fact check on that. If that statement was really made by him, that would be very interesting and actually mean something given his role as a test driver for Porsche AG.
That came from me. WR told me that when I was discussing how to spec my GT4 with him back in February.
Old 10-07-2015, 03:13 PM
  #24  
FORENN
Banned
 
FORENN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,651
Received 666 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

I have ceramics for the first time on my Turbo S. Man, they are touchy! Incredibly quick and sharp bite. I have started to get used to them but the feel is extremely different from steel. They are standard on the TTS, so I'll take them, but I don't know that I see the $8k value in the difference for the GT4 so I'll stick with steel. As for looks, I think the red looks better because it matches the tail lights and rear reflectors. Anyway, there are literally dozens of threads on this issue on various RL forums, so welcome OP and don't be afraid to use the search engine!
Old 10-07-2015, 03:22 PM
  #25  
drdonger
Three Wheelin'
 
drdonger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,751
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sportscentury
I have ceramics for the first time on my Turbo S. Man, they are touchy! Incredibly quick and sharp bite. I have started to get used to them but the feel is extremely different from steel. They are standard on the TTS, so I'll take them, but I don't know that I see the $8k value in the difference for the GT4 so I'll stick with steel. As for looks, I think the red looks better because it matches the tail lights and rear reflectors. Anyway, there are literally dozens of threads on this issue on various RL forums, so welcome OP and don't be afraid to use the search engine!
I agree. I originally had PCCB's spec'd and then switched back to steel brakes as I did not see the value in spending 8k more.
Old 10-07-2015, 04:50 PM
  #26  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,647
Received 946 Likes on 548 Posts
Default

The only reason I got a gt4 was so I could have yellow lwb stitching that matches the calipers.
Old 10-07-2015, 05:48 PM
  #27  
4carl
Race Car
 
4carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: santa barbara
Posts: 3,787
Received 1,098 Likes on 578 Posts
Default

I dont care what your wife/girlfriend tells you.
With brakes its size that matters!
The pccbs are 30mm larger. carl
Old 10-07-2015, 07:42 PM
  #28  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,858 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

I have steel on the Cayman S and PCCB on the Carrera S. Both are obviously great braking systems, but if I was speccing a car today I would absolutely go with PCCB. The brake feel IMO is much better with PCCB and that and the weight savings would be worth it to me. The lack of brake dust and squeal is just a bonus. Driving the cars back to back, the difference is very noticeable.

For track use, I'd have some longevity concerns, but from what I've read, a lot of the problems people complained of were the Gen 2 PCCBs not the Gen 3 PCCBs. Some Rennlisters have reported no durability problems with the Gen 3 PCCBs on the track, but who really knows based on anecdotes on the internet. For a street car though, PCCBs are awesome and worth the money to me. I wouldn't have said that before I owned a car with them, and I wouldn't have specced them if I was building a car. But now that I have them, I couldn't order a car without them.
Old 10-07-2015, 08:56 PM
  #29  
Milehigh981
Rennlist Member
 
Milehigh981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petevb

In terms of street use and costs there is sharp depreciation against (near zero additional value given to used PCCB cars). Overall the smart money would probably be saved for the next car, but there is an argument for PCCBs on a street car for a keeper if you like the pedal feel.
Often wondered about cost/resale value on the PCCB. Potentially a huge bill for the next buyer if they're not aware. 20k for rotors..sheesh.
Old 10-07-2015, 09:02 PM
  #30  
FORENN
Banned
 
FORENN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,651
Received 666 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Milehigh981
Often wondered about cost/resale value on the PCCB. Potentially a huge bill for the next buyer if they're not aware. 20k for rotors..sheesh.
That's the thing. You may be eliminating a portion of your potential buyer pool on resale if you spend the extra money to get PCCBs. Many/most track rats buying used will pass on a car with ceramics. Many RLers have made posts to this effect.


Quick Reply: Ceramic Brakes VS. Regular Brakes



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:11 PM.