Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

X51 and all that - in search of power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2020, 04:18 PM
  #106  
TDT
Burning Brakes
 
TDT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 810
Received 355 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snowy999
Anyone have a view on what Dundon shaped their idea for intake runners on or are they just unique?
To my eye Dundon runners look to follow the form of the GT3(RS) style but they are Dundon unique and they are properly sized to fit directly without requiring adapters as per OEM GT3 RS runners.
The maths is all their own and also those runner have been designed to work with a stock sized plenum. IPD or Carrera S. I don’t know if a GT plenum would fit or work in the same
way?!
Also they are designed for use with their headers and the harmonics and pulses generated by that system.

We see that dundon have then created their own intake plenum for the 911 cars, that work with their runners for those cars also.

Principle objectives are all the same. Optimising/maximising volumetric flow rate for a given RPM.

Last edited by TDT; 11-24-2020 at 04:43 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Snowy999 (11-24-2020)
Old 11-24-2020, 04:59 PM
  #107  
d00d
Rennlist Member
 
d00d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 4MB, HYA
Posts: 1,673
Received 275 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Never mind what I wrote about GT3 plenum flip in the GT4, the plenum orientation is the same with the engine rotated 180 degrees between models.
Only reason I can see for the flip in ajw45's picture is not wanting to install the shorter starter to allow the small flap vacuum unit to fit underneath.
Old 11-26-2020, 12:11 PM
  #108  
Martin Anders
Advanced
 
Martin Anders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 96
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Especially exciting to learn more from your phased test approach. @TDT Are you working with Jens in Germany?

Can someone chime in as to the pure parts cost of the 991.2 GT3 (RS) intake system with the two flaps in the plenum? anybody that has that installed?
@ajw45 - i understand you were quite happy with the 4.0 x51 - you had the street/race personality of the engine i am assuming? did you hear some feedback from people that have the street/track (more mid range torque) personality?

on my spyder i might actually be quite happy with the 4.0 and nice mid-range torque for street use mainly - could even lead to not needing the shorter gearing as i am assuming to have torque/pull from 3000 revs onwards.
Old 11-26-2020, 08:04 PM
  #109  
TDT
Burning Brakes
 
TDT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 810
Received 355 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Yep.
The following users liked this post:
Martin Anders (11-27-2020)
Old 11-27-2020, 03:41 PM
  #110  
ajw45
Three Wheelin'
 
ajw45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC <> Boston
Posts: 1,624
Received 318 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin Anders
Especially exciting to learn more from your phased test approach. @TDT Are you working with Jens in Germany?

Can someone chime in as to the pure parts cost of the 991.2 GT3 (RS) intake system with the two flaps in the plenum? anybody that has that installed?
@ajw45 - i understand you were quite happy with the 4.0 x51 - you had the street/race personality of the engine i am assuming? did you hear some feedback from people that have the street/track (more mid range torque) personality?

on my spyder i might actually be quite happy with the 4.0 and nice mid-range torque for street use mainly - could even lead to not needing the shorter gearing as i am assuming to have torque/pull from 3000 revs onwards.
For the RS intake you'll need to contact Deman (not sure who else does this) about the specialized parts to make the intake fit since it isn't a direct swap like 991s / X51 / 718cs intake. The bolt pattern of the GT3 runners don't match the 981 heads. That said, I bet the cost for the actual plenums from Porsche aren't that different but the CS part maybe a little harder to order since it's a motorsport part.

Yes! I love the character of my engine but it certainly isn't the torque monster it could be. At around 4-5k rpm when engine starts to get into the meaty part of the power band the sound changes from more exhaust bass into angry metallic chainsaw and that's when things start to really move. The torquier engines have no waiting for revs but don't have the build of power to redline so great responsiveness for everyday driving but imho not as exciting a ride when you have the space to wind it out. Actual performance is probably a wash between them. This is what's great about having a mod friendly platform, you can build your engine however you want it to be for your driving. For me, I'm happy having less torque gains under 5k rpm for just getting around town or on the highway in exchange for a ripping top end which feels special even if it's less often enjoyed. Obviously the right answer is go 4.5l and have both the low/midrange torque and the top end
The following users liked this post:
Martin Anders (11-27-2020)
Old 11-27-2020, 06:49 PM
  #111  
Five12Free
Rennlist Member
 
Five12Free's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,496
Received 199 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajw45
For the RS intake you'll need to contact Deman (not sure who else does this) about the specialized parts to make the intake fit since it isn't a direct swap like 991s / X51 / 718cs intake. The bolt pattern of the GT3 runners don't match the 981 heads. That said, I bet the cost for the actual plenums from Porsche aren't that different but the CS part maybe a little harder to order since it's a motorsport part.

Yes! I love the character of my engine but it certainly isn't the torque monster it could be. At around 4-5k rpm when engine starts to get into the meaty part of the power band the sound changes from more exhaust bass into angry metallic chainsaw and that's when things start to really move. The torquier engines have no waiting for revs but don't have the build of power to redline so great responsiveness for everyday driving but imho not as exciting a ride when you have the space to wind it out. Actual performance is probably a wash between them. This is what's great about having a mod friendly platform, you can build your engine however you want it to be for your driving. For me, I'm happy having less torque gains under 5k rpm for just getting around town or on the highway in exchange for a ripping top end which feels special even if it's less often enjoyed. Obviously the right answer is go 4.5l and have both the low/midrange torque and the top end
if you need a donor block for your conversion, I got you covered
Old 12-01-2020, 04:15 AM
  #112  
Martin Anders
Advanced
 
Martin Anders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 96
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajw45
For the RS intake you'll need to contact Deman (not sure who else does this) about the specialized parts to make the intake fit since it isn't a direct swap like 991s / X51 / 718cs intake. The bolt pattern of the GT3 runners don't match the 981 heads. That said, I bet the cost for the actual plenums from Porsche aren't that different but the CS part maybe a little harder to order since it's a motorsport part.

Yes! I love the character of my engine but it certainly isn't the torque monster it could be. At around 4-5k rpm when engine starts to get into the meaty part of the power band the sound changes from more exhaust bass into angry metallic chainsaw and that's when things start to really move. The torquier engines have no waiting for revs but don't have the build of power to redline so great responsiveness for everyday driving but imho not as exciting a ride when you have the space to wind it out. Actual performance is probably a wash between them. This is what's great about having a mod friendly platform, you can build your engine however you want it to be for your driving. For me, I'm happy having less torque gains under 5k rpm for just getting around town or on the highway in exchange for a ripping top end which feels special even if it's less often enjoyed. Obviously the right answer is go 4.5l and have both the low/midrange torque and the top end
Thank You @ajw45 for sharing your abundant experience. I am now pretty sure, that i will be happy with the more street/track optimized 4.0L with x51 heads, 991s intake + larger TB + 100 cell headers -> New point that comes up is a bit worry about the standard clutch slipping at 500NMs of torque vs the 420NM standard. @Warwick Morris mentioned he got clutch slippage as well on a heavily optimized 3.8 with catless headers and x51.
-> should i just try it out and see what happens or directly go for a better clutch? 90% spirited road use and around 3 DE trackdays annually.

Old 12-01-2020, 04:25 AM
  #113  
TDT
Burning Brakes
 
TDT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 810
Received 355 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin Anders
Thank You @ajw45 for sharing your abundant experience. I am now pretty sure, that i will be happy with the more street/track optimized 4.0L with x51 heads, 991s intake + larger TB + 100 cell headers -> New point that comes up is a bit worry about the standard clutch slipping at 500NMs of torque vs the 420NM standard. @Warwick Morris mentioned he got clutch slippage as well on a heavily optimized 3.8 with catless headers and x51.
-> should i just try it out and see what happens or directly go for a better clutch? 90% spirited road use and around 3 DE trackdays annually.
If the engine + gearbox are coming out and being split anyway, it makes sense to do clutch upgrade at the same time. You won’t have to revisit it later on.
IIRC Warwick’s usage is mostly track and road rallye…

Last edited by TDT; 12-01-2020 at 04:28 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Martin Anders (12-01-2020)
Old 12-07-2020, 11:25 AM
  #114  
Jim Vinci
Rennlist Member
 
Jim Vinci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 41
Received 26 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Which block is that I might be interested
Old 12-10-2020, 04:23 AM
  #115  
Snowy999
Rennlist Member
 
Snowy999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 412
Received 183 Likes on 116 Posts
Default


Intake runners from Dundon for comparison
Old 12-10-2020, 09:01 AM
  #116  
TDT
Burning Brakes
 
TDT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 810
Received 355 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snowy999

Intake runners from Dundon for comparison
When is it going in?

Old 12-10-2020, 09:06 AM
  #117  
TDT
Burning Brakes
 
TDT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 810
Received 355 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

My own car will be finished next week.
Old 12-10-2020, 09:38 AM
  #118  
Martin Anders
Advanced
 
Martin Anders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 96
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TDT
My own car will be finished next week.
great stuff - can you already share some insights? Did Jens manage to get the GT3 dual flap intake system to play nice with the GT4 ECU and produce the desired results?
or will you know that next week? keep us posted please
Old 12-10-2020, 11:53 AM
  #119  
TDT
Burning Brakes
 
TDT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 810
Received 355 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin Anders
great stuff - can you already share some insights? Did Jens manage to get the GT3 dual flap intake system to play nice with the GT4 ECU and produce the desired results?
or will you know that next week? keep us posted please
Initial dyno with 718CS intake was done last week... confirms what we have been saying about this solution.
Great linear power up to redline.... super smooth. Pretty flat torque from 2k to 8k.

GT dual flap plenum fitted with the 718CS runners, and M&M Muffler to replace Stock PSE.
So expectation is that the custom map here will realise and release the full potential.

I want to post all the info together once we have final results.
The following users liked this post:
Martin Anders (12-10-2020)
Old 12-10-2020, 12:26 PM
  #120  
Martin Anders
Advanced
 
Martin Anders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 96
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TDT
Initial dyno with 718CS intake was done last week... confirms what we have been saying about this solution.
Great linear power up to redline.... super smooth. Pretty flat torque from 2k to 8k.

GT dual flap plenum fitted with the 718CS runners, and M&M Muffler to replace Stock PSE.
So expectation is that the custom map here will realise and release the full potential.

I want to post all the info together once we have final results.
so what you want out of the solution is more torque down low AND more max HP up high? so far it seems you are quite happy with linear power to redline and flat torque from 2k to 8k - just trying to understand the end goal(s).
Looking forward to the updates. thank you again.



Quick Reply: X51 and all that - in search of power



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:28 PM.