Notices

Porsche EV sales crap out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2024, 08:07 PM
  #1  
BondJ
Pro
Thread Starter
 
BondJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 693
Received 340 Likes on 231 Posts
Default Porsche EV sales crap out

Porsche yesterday announced that it’s scrapping its EV targets due to poor demand. It said…



“Our product strategy is set up such that we could deliver over 80% of our vehicles as all electric in 2030 - dependent on customer demand and the development of electromobility."



That last part is clearly Porsche covering its ****. Makes me think a full ICE 911 (along with hybrid) may be around longer than we thought
The following 4 users liked this post by BondJ:
chance6 (07-23-2024), Galvano (07-23-2024), shrimp money (07-23-2024), tourenwagen (07-23-2024)

Popular Reply

07-23-2024, 08:32 PM
double-o-seven
Instructor
 
double-o-seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 166
Received 94 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hunky
OMG, what about the planet!
Let's burn the planet faster by producing EVs that require substantially higher upfront carbon emissions, compared to ICE cars. CO2 emissions breakeven relative to ICE cars not achieved until each EV reaches about 90K miles from brand new.

Better yet, let's pollute the groundwater and the soil everywhere around the world by mining lithium and rare earth metals that are not required in ICE cars but critically necessary in EVs. That's what environmental "free lunch" is about.

To add insult to the injury, let's waste and trash our environment by sending EV's to crushers on simple fender-benders - as in Tesla EVs - and let's pump out newer EV's to replace those fender-bendered EVs.

This is the way to save the planet. /s
Old 07-23-2024, 08:18 PM
  #2  
Hunky
Racer
 
Hunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 273
Received 187 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

OMG, what about the planet!
The following 3 users liked this post by Hunky:
incoming992s (07-23-2024), M3Inline6 (07-23-2024), tonie90 (07-24-2024)
Old 07-23-2024, 08:32 PM
  #3  
double-o-seven
Instructor
 
double-o-seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 166
Received 94 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hunky
OMG, what about the planet!
Let's burn the planet faster by producing EVs that require substantially higher upfront carbon emissions, compared to ICE cars. CO2 emissions breakeven relative to ICE cars not achieved until each EV reaches about 90K miles from brand new.

Better yet, let's pollute the groundwater and the soil everywhere around the world by mining lithium and rare earth metals that are not required in ICE cars but critically necessary in EVs. That's what environmental "free lunch" is about.

To add insult to the injury, let's waste and trash our environment by sending EV's to crushers on simple fender-benders - as in Tesla EVs - and let's pump out newer EV's to replace those fender-bendered EVs.

This is the way to save the planet. /s
The following 11 users liked this post by double-o-seven:
CamsPorsche (07-23-2024), Galvano (07-23-2024), Hunky (07-23-2024), incoming992s (07-23-2024), Kevin_ (07-24-2024), ldamelio (07-24-2024), NickM (07-23-2024), nvbirdman (07-23-2024), Odin (Yesterday), shrimp money (07-23-2024), TheSunTheSea (07-23-2024) and 6 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 07-23-2024, 08:41 PM
  #4  
BondJ
Pro
Thread Starter
 
BondJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 693
Received 340 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

🤣

Politics aside, there’s a simple bottom line…if Porsche can’t shift the electric crap, it’s gonna have to keep making ICE vehicles. Or go out of business
The following 4 users liked this post by BondJ:
BED997 (07-23-2024), Hunky (07-23-2024), shrimp money (07-23-2024), Webfiero (07-24-2024)
Old 07-23-2024, 08:43 PM
  #5  
Hunky
Racer
 
Hunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 273
Received 187 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by double-o-seven
Let's burn the planet faster by producing EVs that require substantially higher upfront carbon emissions, compared to ICE cars. CO2 emissions breakeven relative to ICE cars not achieved until each EV reaches about 90K miles from brand new.

Better yet, let's pollute the groundwater and the soil everywhere around the world by mining lithium and rare earth metals that are not required in ICE cars but critically necessary in EVs. That's what environmental "free lunch" is about.

To add insult to the injury, let's waste and trash our environment by sending EV's to crushers on simple fender-benders - as in Tesla EVs - and let's pump out newer EV's to replace those fender-bendered EVs.

This is the way to save the planet. /s
This is the truth. The tree humpers and EPA pencil necks will never acknowledge this reality. God damn scam.

Last edited by Hunky; 07-23-2024 at 08:52 PM.
The following 4 users liked this post by Hunky:
double-o-seven (07-23-2024), Kevin_ (07-24-2024), shrimp money (07-23-2024), TheSunTheSea (07-23-2024)
Old 07-23-2024, 08:52 PM
  #6  
F8Driver
Pro
 
F8Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 625
Received 334 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

One of many "green" scams to save the planet. That said, as EV's go, Porsche's interpretation was better than most, albeit short on range. I might get a previously owned one at 1/4 MSRP and the wife can drive it into battery oblivion.
The following 2 users liked this post by F8Driver:
M3Inline6 (07-23-2024), shrimp money (07-23-2024)
Old 07-23-2024, 08:55 PM
  #7  
double-o-seven
Instructor
 
double-o-seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 166
Received 94 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hunky
This is the truth. The tree humpers and EPA pencil necks will never acknowledge this reality. God damn scam.
Personally, I'm all for saving the environment by shifting emphasis to more Prius and Camry-style hybrid vehicles from pure ICE cars. Toyota has this right.

However, battery-only EV cars are not great for the environment in any way or form. It's simply a politically-indoctrinated myth.
The following users liked this post:
shrimp money (07-23-2024)
Old 07-23-2024, 09:01 PM
  #8  
Hunky
Racer
 
Hunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 273
Received 187 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by double-o-seven
Personally, I'm all for saving the environment by shifting emphasis to more Prius and Camry-style hybrid vehicles from pure ICE cars. Toyota has this right.

However, battery-only EV cars are not great for the environment in any way or form. It's simply a politically-indoctrinated myth.
Agree. We have a 2024 X6 M60i with mild(non plug in) hybrid system and the vehicle is magnificient. The hybrid 48 system can supply an additional 150 lb Ft of torque when the system calls on it. This is on top of a 4.4L TT V8. Really fast SUV that is a ball to drive.
The following users liked this post:
double-o-seven (07-23-2024)
Old 07-23-2024, 09:04 PM
  #9  
BondJ
Pro
Thread Starter
 
BondJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 693
Received 340 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F8Driver
One of many "green" scams to save the planet. That said, as EV's go, Porsche's interpretation was better than most, albeit short on range. I might get a previously owned one at 1/4 MSRP and the wife can drive it into battery oblivion.
Your tongue-in-cheek comment may be more real than you think. Below is a copy and paste from this month’s Top Gear UK magazine written by a journo long term-testing a Mercedes EQE…



“THIS IS NOT GOING TO MAKE pretty reading for Mercedes. I called up a dealer pretending to be a disgruntled EQE customer wanting out of electric. I wanted to know what my car was worth as a trade-in against a new E-Class estate. When I made the call it was three months old and had covered 4,500 miles. The answer was £45,000 ($58,000). I've never seen anything like what's going on in the premium EV market at the moment. It's a bloodbath. The EQE has lost getting on for £500 ($650) per day. If you need some perspective on that, try this: every watt of electricity it has consumed covering those 4,500 miles comes to £823.01 ($1065). I'd worked out that due to high electricity prices it was no more financially economical than a petrol doing 34.7mpg, and that had shocked me. But this? Wow. What's going on here? Distrust of EVs and range anxiety, government rowbacks ruining consumer confidence, high purchase costs, and business users that bought EVs as a tax dodge and are now flooding used ones back onto the market. It's everywhere you look. But I'm afraid EQE values are only going one way for the foreseeable.”



Yes, it’s only one model from one manufacturer sold/being run in the UK…but none the less shocking
Old 07-23-2024, 09:10 PM
  #10  
Hunky
Racer
 
Hunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 273
Received 187 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BondJ
Your tongue-in-cheek comment may be more real than you think. Below is a copy and paste from this month’s Top Gear UK magazine written by a journo long term-testing a Mercedes EQE…



“THIS IS NOT GOING TO MAKE pretty reading for Mercedes. I called up a dealer pretending to be a disgruntled EQE customer wanting out of electric. I wanted to know what my car was worth as a trade-in against a new E-Class estate. When I made the call it was three months old and had covered 4,500 miles. The answer was £45,000 ($58,000). I've never seen anything like what's going on in the premium EV market at the moment. It's a bloodbath. The EQE has lost getting on for £500 ($650) per day. If you need some perspective on that, try this: every watt of electricity it has consumed covering those 4,500 miles comes to £823.01 ($1065). I'd worked out that due to high electricity prices it was no more financially economical than a petrol doing 34.7mpg, and that had shocked me. But this? Wow. What's going on here? Distrust of EVs and range anxiety, government rowbacks ruining consumer confidence, high purchase costs, and business users that bought EVs as a tax dodge and are now flooding used ones back onto the market. It's everywhere you look. But I'm afraid EQE values are only going one way for the foreseeable.”



Yes, it’s only one model from one manufacturer sold/being run in the UK…but none the less shocking
Absolutely astounding amount of depreciation. Sounds like a disposable vehicle after 2 or 3 years.
Old 07-23-2024, 10:12 PM
  #11  
nyca
Drifting
 
nyca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: new york
Posts: 2,305
Received 915 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

The problem is, the western governments (especially the EU) seem perfectly willing to let their automakers go under, and advance cheap Chinese EVs because they know consumers won't be able to resist a $15000 car.
The following users liked this post:
Mike981S (07-24-2024)
Old 07-23-2024, 10:39 PM
  #12  
nvbirdman
Intermediate
 
nvbirdman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 40
Received 40 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I was just thinking yesterday about our current President who wants everybody to drive an EV, but what's in his garage? That's right, a Corvette.
Old 07-23-2024, 10:54 PM
  #13  
Nein Eleven
Racer
 
Nein Eleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 451
Received 338 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nvbirdman
I was just thinking yesterday about our current President who wants everybody to drive an EV, but what's in his garage? That's right, a Corvette.
Presidents aren't allowed to drive.
Old 07-23-2024, 11:00 PM
  #14  
CodyBigdog
Banned
 
CodyBigdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 4,026
Received 2,236 Likes on 1,266 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by double-o-seven
Let's burn the planet faster by producing EVs that require substantially higher upfront carbon emissions, compared to ICE cars. CO2 emissions breakeven relative to ICE cars not achieved until each EV reaches about 90K miles from brand new.

Better yet, let's pollute the groundwater and the soil everywhere around the world by mining lithium and rare earth metals that are not required in ICE cars but critically necessary in EVs. That's what environmental "free lunch" is about.

To add insult to the injury, let's waste and trash our environment by sending EV's to crushers on simple fender-benders - as in Tesla EVs - and let's pump out newer EV's to replace those fender-bendered EVs.
Exaggerate much?

https://www.reuters.com/business/aut...rs-2021-06-29/

Including the “upfront” carbon cost for EV’s, the “break even point” depends on a number of variables. But comparing apples with apples, the break even point between a tesla 3 and Toyota Corolla is 8K miles for EV’s that recharge from hydro/wind/solar/nuclear and up to a maximum of 75k miles when the EV is charged from coal fired power plants.
The following users liked this post:
Mike981S (07-24-2024)
Old 07-23-2024, 11:02 PM
  #15  
CodyBigdog
Banned
 
CodyBigdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 4,026
Received 2,236 Likes on 1,266 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nyca
The problem is, the western governments (especially the EU) seem perfectly willing to let their automakers go under, and advance cheap Chinese EVs because they know consumers won't be able to resist a $15000 car.
Really?

Have any proof of that?

I have proof to the contrary.


Quick Reply: Porsche EV sales crap out



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:40 PM.