Notices

GPS vs. CAN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2018 | 12:54 AM
  #1  
Ubermensch's Avatar
Ubermensch
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 178
Default GPS vs. CAN

When it comes to speed and accelerometer readings, is the a strong preference for GPS versus the values coming from the car directly?

I'm referring to a SoloDL if that makes any difference.

-Shawn
Old 07-18-2018 | 07:50 AM
  #2  
Matt Romanowski's Avatar
Matt Romanowski
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,741
Likes: 1,037
From: Manchester, NH
Default

I like GPS speed for general reference. I'll use wheel speeds when looking for brake lockup, diff function etc. GPS speed doesn't have wheel slip, tire growth, or diameter problems, so it's much more accurate.

Accelerometer depends on what I'm looking at. Sometimes is use the GPS, sometimes the device, sometimes the vehicle (if available). The practical difference is the GPS is usually a bit smoother.
Old 07-18-2018 | 10:09 AM
  #3  
ProCoach's Avatar
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,273
Likes: 3,470
From: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Default

+1

In the SDL, I would rely on GPS calculated accelerometer readings if you are not religious about calibrating the unit IN PLACE properly. Yes, you can fix it later, but it’s a PITA.

As Matt says, most of the topical, expedited review can rely on the GPS calculated accelerometer channels, but GPS speed as reference, especially in a car with any tire/wheel/sizing mods, is a godsend.
Old 07-18-2018 | 11:55 AM
  #4  
Ubermensch's Avatar
Ubermensch
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 178
Default

Thanks for the quick and informative answers.

S.
Old 07-18-2018 | 02:56 PM
  #5  
ProCoach's Avatar
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,273
Likes: 3,470
From: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Default

Originally Posted by Ubermensch
Thanks for the quick and informative answers.

S.
Now, if you talk to Neel, Chris Brown and other old schoolers, you may get a different answer! Hahahaha!
Old 07-18-2018 | 03:02 PM
  #6  
Matt Romanowski's Avatar
Matt Romanowski
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,741
Likes: 1,037
From: Manchester, NH
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
Now, if you talk to Neel, Chris Brown and other old schoolers, you may get a different answer! Hahahaha!
Certainly will!

This place had become a great data forum and I've really enjoyed all the questions and discussion that takes place.
Old 09-06-2018 | 10:41 AM
  #7  
amso3's Avatar
amso3
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 14
From: North Port, FL
Default

I'm an "Old" schooler and I always prefer actual accelerometer readings over GPS. GPS is calculated at 10Hz, I usually set accelerometers at 20 Hz.
Old 09-06-2018 | 11:01 AM
  #8  
ProCoach's Avatar
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,273
Likes: 3,470
From: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Default

Originally Posted by amso3
I'm an "Old" schooler and I always prefer actual accelerometer readings over GPS. GPS is calculated at 10Hz, I usually set accelerometers at 20 Hz.
<grin>

Unless you have 20 Hz RaceGrade or VBOX Pro 20 Hz GPs sampling and calculation...

Seriously, I agree, Jerry. As long as the logger isn’t hard mounted or flopping around in the car...



Quick Reply: GPS vs. CAN



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:31 PM.