Cayenne S E-Hybrid opinions or advice?
#1
5th Gear
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hi Guys, first Post here. Been doing a lot of reading on the Cayenne behind the scene. Seriously considering a 2016 - 2018 Cayenne S E-Hybrid (PHEV) as i want to try the technology for daily use. My current lease will be finishing by next year. Would like to get your suggestions if I may. Pretty much have all the information on the E-Hybrid but would just like to get opinions from others who has experience or have experienced owning said trim. Current lease is a 2017 MDX.
Moderator pls move to correct group if needed.
Thank you for any inputs you might have.
Regards,
Ben
Moderator pls move to correct group if needed.
Thank you for any inputs you might have.
Regards,
Ben
Last edited by NakCY8; 10-29-2019 at 01:17 PM. Reason: added input
#2
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I will tell you what I decided when I was looking for them. The 2016s were getting near to my price range, but I couldn't justify it. The all electric range is not enough to make up any kind of fuel savings. But I did test drive one and really liked the rush, but could tell it was heavier than the base I had also tested. I considered buying a private owner SEH in Atlanta and was calling around to the local dealers to see if they did PPIs (they don't) and getting the vehicle history. One of the service advisors said his advice was NEVER buy one of the e-hybrids without a warranty, that they had seen too many issues. Anecdotal evidence, sure, but it scared me off/confirmed my reservations. I did like that they all seemed to come with PASM, but not with everything--the one I drove did not have back up camera. Seriously.
The following users liked this post:
NakCY8 (10-29-2019)
#3
5th Gear
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I will tell you what I decided when I was looking for them. The 2016s were getting near to my price range, but I couldn't justify it. The all electric range is not enough to make up any kind of fuel savings. But I did test drive one and really liked the rush, but could tell it was heavier than the base I had also tested. I considered buying a private owner SEH in Atlanta and was calling around to the local dealers to see if they did PPIs (they don't) and getting the vehicle history. One of the service advisors said his advice was NEVER buy one of the e-hybrids without a warranty, that they had seen too many issues. Anecdotal evidence, sure, but it scared me off/confirmed my reservations. I did like that they all seemed to come with PASM, but not with everything--the one I drove did not have back up camera. Seriously.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thanks..
#4
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Skip it. My wife has a S eHybrid Panamera, and we have had more issues with the hybrid system than I care for. It took a while for them to figure it out. Once it's out of warranty, those hybrid parts are really expensive. We are going to buy a Fidelity warranty, because she doesn't like the new Panamera. If you want great mileage go diesel. If that's not important go fuel burner.
#5
5th Gear
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Skip it. My wife has a S eHybrid Panamera, and we have had more issues with the hybrid system than I care for. It took a while for them to figure it out. Once it's out of warranty, those hybrid parts are really expensive. We are going to buy a Fidelity warranty, because she doesn't like the new Panamera. If you want great mileage go diesel. If that's not important go fuel burner.
Thanks Guys!!
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#6
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm in the same boat. My wife's 957 CTT is getting old and I want to replace it with either a 2016+ 3.6TT S or an SEH.
Her current 957 TT gets 8.5mpg in city driving so an SEH would be a major improvement. I don't care about the money it costs to run but it gets old quickly with trips to the gas station every 180 miles.
Her current 957 TT gets 8.5mpg in city driving so an SEH would be a major improvement. I don't care about the money it costs to run but it gets old quickly with trips to the gas station every 180 miles.
#7
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm in the same boat. My wife's 957 CTT is getting old and I want to replace it with either a 2016+ 3.6TT S or an SEH.
Her current 957 TT gets 8.5mpg in city driving so an SEH would be a major improvement. I don't care about the money it costs to run but it gets old quickly with trips to the gas station every 180 miles.
Her current 957 TT gets 8.5mpg in city driving so an SEH would be a major improvement. I don't care about the money it costs to run but it gets old quickly with trips to the gas station every 180 miles.
The following users liked this post:
mafpolo (10-30-2019)
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by vwbrd
I considered SEH because most days I drive ~10 miles (2 mile trips to work & kid p/u). Got the CD instead and I get 20mpg on my short trips and 31mpg highway. My Pilot only got 10-12 on short trips and barely cracked 20 if it was all highway. Also the CD has 26gal tank. I just hit reserve with 541 miles and very little hwy this tank.