Notices
Cayenne 955-957 2003-2010 1st Generation
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2013 Range Rover instead of Cayenne?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2012, 11:15 AM
  #16  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blazing928
We looked at the MY 12 RR, but ended up unexpectedly in a Cayenne. We thought the interior was better & it certainly drove a lot better.
If we had 3 kids then a RR or D4, is a better size, or a GL, but we don't like the MB bling.
RR reliability is very good these days, lots of friends have them.
I am certain that in a few years we will test a RR, I have had two before, so I am a big fan, they have a special ambiance that others don't come close to, but for driving the CD blows it away.
We thought the Q7 was very average, felt smaller than the Cayenne, just didn't bother.
All in all RR v Cayenne is a different market.
We looked at Audi Q7 and VW Touareg (not bad, but practically identical to Cayenne with a nicer cabin) and decided the Audi was an abject fail and the VW was the lesser sister to the Porsche.

I absolutely agree the RR is effectively a different vehicle to the Cayenne, it's more a case of a situation like choosing between a luxury car and a sports car. I guess my question here is whether I want the luxury or that handling and driving "edge" that I imagine the Cayenne would deliver.
Old 10-01-2012, 11:42 AM
  #17  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PN Cal
Isn´t the RR shown in Paris only for Europe a 2013, but US will only get it as a 2014? And they might not get a Diesel. It clearly looks nice, though, I have to say, if you like sporty, the Cayenne is the much better car. The Audi Q7 will also come in as a new model in 2013. But now, if we compare next generation cars, then you might look at the porsche.com page and see the station wagon version of the Panamera. I am sure, that this gives you some idea of the next generation Cayenne. If you want to buy today, I can clearly recommend the Cayenne. If you have another year, then there will be a new Audi Q7, a new BMW X5, a new RR and most likely a facelifted Cayenne. Oh, actually comparing the Cayenne to Hyundai seems to be like a funny comparison, maybe when never seen a Hyundai. My Luxor Beige interior is still the nicest interior that I have seen, so far. And if you do not have small kids, you might go for the full leather version, which just looks awesome.
I've been getting marketing stuff from Land Rover. Their Web site suggests it's a current "new" vehicle -- ready to build to spec and order. I don't imagine they want to waste a minute getting this to the US market.

http://www.landrover.com/us/en/lr/all-new-range-rover/

I still have reservations about the exterior design -- the lights seems just a bit too stylized. The cabin looks great. The steering wheel is a bit ornate. Nit-picking, I guess. When I look at the Cayenne cabin, not only is it already due for a facelift to catch up to the 991, but it just doesn't appeal in the first place. Hate to think of resale values for a 2013 Cayenne Turbo once the 2013/2014 family facelift hits the market and it becomes "the old model."
Old 10-01-2012, 12:09 PM
  #18  
Yukio&958
Track Day
 
Yukio&958's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary,Canada
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

New RR looks like 2012 ford explorer

Old 10-01-2012, 12:24 PM
  #19  
Cowboys5
Instructor
 
Cowboys5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds to me like you've already decided what you want, so just get the RR. To say though that the cayenne interior is sub par or is in desperate need of an update is just plain silly. I love it and that's one of the things that sold me.
Old 10-01-2012, 12:28 PM
  #20  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lupo.sk
I visited the Paris motor show on Thursday and had a looong sit in the new RR. I must say: WOOOOOOOOOOW. of course, they had only Autobiography top-of-the-line models, but nevertheless - design, interior space and utility is like nothing else on the market nowadays. new cayenne looks like a hyundai and the RR stands really out and cannot be mistaken for anything else on the road.

btw, the guy sitting in the back is 6'7" and still had plenty of leg room.
Thanks! Very useful to see "real" photos and to get firsthand impressions.
Old 10-01-2012, 12:38 PM
  #21  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cowboys5
Sounds to me like you've already decided what you want, so just get the RR. To say though that the cayenne interior is sub par or is in desperate need of an update is just plain silly. I love it and that's one of the things that sold me.
Yes, it would be silly if someone said "sub par" or "desperate need" ... I'm certainly glad I never said either of those things.

The Cayenne cabin is older than the 991 and is therefore "already due" for an update. Hardly to say sub-par or desperate. I personally just plain don't like the Cayenne cabin. Never have. That doesn't stop me buying the car for other reasons and I chose it in 2005 despite the cabin back then being inferior to the 2005 Prius! And sure enough, the 2012 Cayenne is inferior to the 2012 Prius ... in my humble ... Porsche buys cheap electronics and goes for cheap cabin design and materials ... even in "Full Leather" just compare to an Aston or Rangie and you have to say Porsche is fooling nobody with the 997 Turbo S cabin at $180K, or the Cayenne Turbo Power Kit at $150K, both really are sub par for that price neighborhood.

I'm not overjoyed by the new RR cabins in the last ten years, either, but the quality, design and materials are generous and in keeping with the price tag.

The GL cabin is very good -- still nothing extraordinary, though very good seats, but astonishingly bad electronics (nav, phone integration ... absolutely pathetic for 2005, let alone 2012, but updated a lot for 2013 because Benz realized their customers were not happy ... and I think you can look at the updated BMW cabin as motivation for Benz to catch up.)
Old 10-01-2012, 12:43 PM
  #22  
RESP
Burning Brakes
 
RESP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting take on cabin designs.

I quite like the Porsche cabin, but maybe it is about what floats your boat.

No wonder there are so many different car companies, with so many different niche models
Old 10-01-2012, 12:45 PM
  #23  
bgsntth
Racer
 
bgsntth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Marin, CA
Posts: 318
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I think it is a tough argument to say that a Cayenne has an advantage over a RR in terms of reliability. Both my '08 RRS S\C and '08 FFRR have been the most reliable vehicles I have owned; and, way, way more reliable than my prior '09 GTS. The trick is to never buy in the first year of the model change, as there are ALWAYS electronic bugs to work out. My in-law's 2010 FFRR has had a lot of issues related to the electronics and battery.

The Cayenne is a lot more fun to drive than the RRS or FFRR, but the Landy's are much superior off-road and the FFRR is one of the nicest vehicles to drive I have ever experienced (smooth, cosseted comfort). The 2013 is suppossed to have major changes in the suspension, so it will be interesting to see if the handling has improved. It is also hard to believe the 2013 FFRR lost so much weight and kept its transfer case.
Old 10-01-2012, 01:08 PM
  #24  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bgsntth
I think it is a tough argument to say that a Cayenne has an advantage over a RR in terms of reliability. Both my '08 RRS S\C and '08 FFRR have been the most reliable vehicles I have owned; and, way, way more reliable than my prior '09 GTS. The trick is to never buy in the first year of the model change, as there are ALWAYS electronic bugs to work out. My in-law's 2010 FFRR has had a lot of issues related to the electronics and battery.

The Cayenne is a lot more fun to drive than the RRS or FFRR, but the Landy's are much superior off-road and the FFRR is one of the nicest vehicles to drive I have ever experienced (smooth, cosseted comfort). The 2013 is suppossed to have major changes in the suspension, so it will be interesting to see if the handling has improved. It is also hard to believe the 2013 FFRR lost so much weight and kept its transfer case.
What's an FFRR?
The 2013 Range Rover lost 420 kilos ... I find it astonishing in two ways: first, to shed 900+ pounds from a car means they really did something ... Porsche shaves off 50 lbs and would have you believe the GT3 RS 4.0 needs to be secured to the ground with tie-downs or it might float away on a breeze ... : ) ... and second, the damn thing is still over 4800lbs! The 2012 Rangie is a heavy damn land yacht!
Old 10-01-2012, 01:28 PM
  #25  
911SLOW
Admin
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
911SLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Athens
Posts: 11,010
Likes: 0
Received 126 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

The day you stop thinking cars on Aussie price terms is the day that you'll probably stop paying in USD for all these heavy, overrated and expensive lorries and their accompanied dilemmas.

You are welcome and I'll be here all week. : )
Old 10-01-2012, 01:43 PM
  #26  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911SLOW
The day you stop thinking cars on Aussie price terms is the day that you'll probably stop paying in USD for all these heavy, overrated and expensive lorries and their accompanied dilemmas.

You are welcome and I'll be here all week. : )
You're absolutely right!

Although, I remember it as if it were yesterday, the day I moved from Australia to California, I was stupid for just long enough to buy one of the best 911's -- best cars -- I've ever encountered (the '94 RS America) which was simply unobtainable at home, but in Silicon Valley, they were giving them away with every order of burger with fries and large soda ... the "cheapest" 911 was also by far the best car in the (any) showroom ... the world was truly upside down, and I was happy as a clam.

But it only took a little while longer to acclimate to the local market and decide that cars which cost three times as much and fuel that cost twice as much at home were distant memories and my salary had more than doubled, my living costs were less than half, but that didn't change my humble upbringing to hold on to whatever little money I had, so tight that I could rub the face off a penny.

I still get that same "grinder" reputation when I buy a new car ... the local Porsche and Land Rover dealers do not greet me at the door with a hardy handshake ... : )
Old 10-01-2012, 02:07 PM
  #27  
gt2r
Advanced
 
gt2r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you really drive an SUV off road very often? I have had 4 new Cayenne's since it was first released. Minor problems with the 1st one and no issues since. Even though the low range was nice to have in the snow country that I live in, I have used it 4-5 times in the past 8 years. Either one of these vehicles would do well off road but personally I would never use it off road because of the risk of a pannel ding or branch/brush scatches. I use an suv for hawling dogs, golf clubs, skis and other larger items. I would guess 99% of SUV owners do as well. Besides most of the driving is done on roads/highways where the Cayenne is miles ahead of the Rover
Old 10-01-2012, 03:24 PM
  #28  
sechsgang
Rennlist Member
 
sechsgang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ...PA...
Posts: 3,979
Received 1,022 Likes on 477 Posts
Default

I just had a 2011 RR SC and it was a pretty good truck. Fit an finish were nice, drive was pretty good etc etc. But certain things really bothered me. The Infotainment system is ANTIQUE other than being touchscreen. The audio quality is nice but for a 6 hundred-ish watt system lacked a ton of midrange and the vibrations through the steeringwheel that seemed to come off and on (like a tire balance) throughout all sorts of driving bugged the ever loving hell out of me. So I went and drove a new Cayenne GTS and immediately put an order in for it (always liked the cayenne and this one was just too sweet for me to pass up). The kicker of all this is I sold my RR as to avoid taking a hit and in doing so ended up with a 60k 08 denali that Ill be driving till my GTS gets in (Ok, I have my 997 Turbo S for fun duty so its not like Im "stuck"). And I have to admit, I LOVE the Denali. It handles surprisingly well, has ample power, has an easy to use infotainment system (thats actually on par with the range system at least prior to 2013) and oddly, other than normal truck "vibrations", its SMOOTHER than my range rover. FWIW,the cayenne GTS' steering is GLASS SMOOTH. That alone to me is enough to go into that car because I'm incredibly sensitive to that aspect. Oh, and your GL was smoother steering wise than my range rover was...I looked at them too.
Old 10-01-2012, 04:17 PM
  #29  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gt2r
Do you really drive an SUV off road very often? I have had 4 new Cayenne's since it was first released. Minor problems with the 1st one and no issues since. Even though the low range was nice to have in the snow country that I live in, I have used it 4-5 times in the past 8 years. Either one of these vehicles would do well off road but personally I would never use it off road because of the risk of a pannel ding or branch/brush scatches. I use an suv for hawling dogs, golf clubs, skis and other larger items. I would guess 99% of SUV owners do as well. Besides most of the driving is done on roads/highways where the Cayenne is miles ahead of the Rover
I'm in the minority as far as using these "soft-road" off-road SUVs. Porsche was always at a loss for the likes of me, asking for low-range transfer case, front diff lock, upgraded PASM with longer travel, snorkel etc. When they came along with the Transylvania, well it was a tad late in the product cycle for me and still short of the mark, but that's where I use the Cayenne and Rangie and others -- deep sand, deep snow, off-road trails, climbing through mountain ranges, or winching and hauling around my property. They tend to lead a tough life, though the GL has had it easiest of all -- no low-range in this model, no easy way to mount a winch without (yet another) custom fabrication, etc. Aside from dirt bike riding in deserts or climbing to out of the way mountain biking, it just does the long legged distance running ... not even much towing of late, just no time for track days and nothing more than firewood or a snowmobile to move around. The diesel gives it great range and it's so insanely quiet at speed, but Distonic (automatic/dynamic cruise control) is now on my "must have" option list for this kind of utility vehicle. Invaluable. The Rangie came back on my shortlist solely because it (and the Cayenne) now offer the smart cruise control.

But this next one will be back to snow express and off-road work, a fabricated winch mount, etc. I'll be selling my spare GL wheels and studded snow tires if I don't the next GL, so I do try to figure in the various costs and pencil in line items against each scenario.

As for wear and tear, I try to keep them in mint condition, but I have no hesitation in using them. All the SUVs, even the (then) absurdly expensive $130K Cayenne was subjected to studded snow tires, chains (not recommend by Porsche) on all wheels, towing over its 7700 limit, a 9500lb winch in the rear hitch receiver for self-recovery and for clearing property, removing downed trees ... you name it. It required little more than a trip to the dealer for some scuffs and dent-pro work to have it back to "showroom" condition. Same for the Rangie when it got buried to the axles in mud on the side of a 1:1 slope and ended up balanced on two wheels, with its winch holding it from rolling over. Took it into the dealer and they complained about it clogging up their detail bay with mud! : ) So much for my Camel Trophy wanna-be experiences ...
Old 10-01-2012, 04:44 PM
  #30  
sechsgang
Rennlist Member
 
sechsgang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ...PA...
Posts: 3,979
Received 1,022 Likes on 477 Posts
Default

^^wow damn if you really use the suv like that and want all the lux then go for the range! Or get a ford raptor...haha.


Quick Reply: 2013 Range Rover instead of Cayenne?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:12 PM.