Notices
Cayenne 955-957 2003-2010 1st Generation
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Quick pics. New 2012 with the new upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-2011, 10:58 PM
  #31  
kalyan
Burning Brakes
 
kalyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 927
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rijowysock
it is a v6, I am a VERY strong advocate for the V6... and find the power and comfort very comparable to the current v8 (the turbo being set apart in its own realm)
Easy for you to say when you live at sea level. Bring it up to 6600 feet and see how powerful it is.

Very nice specs and beautiful color choices! Enjoy it in good health!
Old 11-12-2011, 12:06 PM
  #32  
jerry joseph
Pro
 
jerry joseph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A nice touch would be to have your calipers painted white
Old 11-12-2011, 02:39 PM
  #33  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rijowysock
it is a v6, I am a VERY strong advocate for the V6... and find the power and comfort very comparable to the current v8 (the turbo being set apart in its own realm)
No disrespect to the V6 intended, as it is wonderful, and may meet your needs perfectly. But you overstate the case. The difference in performance between the V6 and V8 is greater than the difference between the V8 and Turbo, according to factory specs.
Old 01-07-2012, 09:11 PM
  #34  
JakarM
7th Gear
 
JakarM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: H-Town Texas
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 2012 cayenne (sept. delivery) i have right now doesn't have aluminum pedals. Did you add it as an option or was it standard? I'm also really irritated that right after mines was built, they changed it. I'm really hoping they will offer a retrofitted clock.

I LOVE the interior and the black trims on the exterior!!!
Old 01-07-2012, 09:32 PM
  #35  
LastMezger
Rennlist Member
 
LastMezger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 6th gear!
Posts: 4,313
Received 119 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
No disrespect to the V6 intended, as it is wonderful, and may meet your needs perfectly. But you overstate the case. The difference in performance between the V6 and V8 is greater than the difference between the V8 and Turbo, according to factory specs.
Yeah but not in terms of "feel". Both naturally aspirated engines are much more similar in feel as they can't compare to the effortless part-throttle thrust of the Turbo. I agree completely with the OP.
Old 01-08-2012, 11:58 AM
  #36  
rijowysock
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
rijowysock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Arctic Cold
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JakarM
The 2012 cayenne (sept. delivery) i have right now doesn't have aluminum pedals. Did you add it as an option or was it standard? I'm also really irritated that right after mines was built, they changed it. I'm really hoping they will offer a retrofitted clock.

I LOVE the interior and the black trims on the exterior!!!
bought them, the come on turbo and S, you can buy them from parts guy at dealer... wear gloves when you put them on... otherwise you get cut bad...
Old 01-08-2012, 11:51 PM
  #37  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SharpMan
Yeah but not in terms of "feel". Both naturally aspirated engines are much more similar in feel as they can't compare to the effortless part-throttle thrust of the Turbo. I agree completely with the OP.
Ah, the elusive "feel". All I know is that, TT notwithstanding, a V8 Tip is almost 2 seconds faster to 60 than a V6 tip, which is what the OP owned. A pretty significant difference, that one also ought to be able to "feel".....
Old 01-09-2012, 01:24 AM
  #38  
rijowysock
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
rijowysock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Arctic Cold
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
Ah, the elusive "feel". All I know is that, TT notwithstanding, a V8 Tip is almost 2 seconds faster to 60 than a V6 tip, which is what the OP owned. A pretty significant difference, that one also ought to be able to "feel".....
1.5 seconds, yes it's "felt" but with the 958 mostly because of weight loss i feel, the gap is much tighter between v6/v8 than in the previous chassis.


i have driven the three variants of the 958, and daily drive the v6 with pleasure... the previous v6 was very sluggish and made the v8 the go to engine...

either way i know those who paid 14k more for their engine would like to feel like they got "the best damn engine" so i wont go on anymore, but i suggest you go to local dealer and try and test drive a v6 with sport mode on around town and you'll see the difference is very tight... on the highway however the extra displacement and power shows up clearly at speeds above 60... the v6 will still drop down and go but the v8 does it much better.

i drive my cayenne very spirited but for daily use, the v6 is more than sufficient, I rarely even find a time where I need "more engine" unless im on the highway passing someone, but highway driving is still a breeze and the car gets to cruising speeds with ease and stays there without much added effort.. (some small engine vehicles dont wanna easily cruise @ 100+, the v6 cayenne easily cruises at highway speed with ease..
Old 01-09-2012, 02:27 AM
  #39  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rijowysock
1.5 seconds, yes it's "felt" but with the 958 mostly because of weight loss i feel, the gap is much tighter between v6/v8 than in the previous chassis.


i have driven the three variants of the 958, and daily drive the v6 with pleasure... the previous v6 was very sluggish and made the v8 the go to engine...

either way i know those who paid 14k more for their engine would like to feel like they got "the best damn engine" so i wont go on anymore, but i suggest you go to local dealer and try and test drive a v6 with sport mode on around town and you'll see the difference is very tight... on the highway however the extra displacement and power shows up clearly at speeds above 60... the v6 will still drop down and go but the v8 does it much better.

i drive my cayenne very spirited but for daily use, the v6 is more than sufficient, I rarely even find a time where I need "more engine" unless im on the highway passing someone, but highway driving is still a breeze and the car gets to cruising speeds with ease and stays there without much added effort.. (some small engine vehicles dont wanna easily cruise @ 100+, the v6 cayenne easily cruises at highway speed with ease..
Actually 1.8 seconds between tip V6 and V8 but who's counting...... Seriously, in no way do I mean to disparage the V6. Is it more than adequate for almost any situation? Absolutely. You might notice the difference on occasion when towing, or in certain highway situations as you've described, but in any case it's not a big deal. FWIW, I think it's just as possible that someone who spent $14K less for their V6 might be trying to justify their decision as much as the person who spent more for a V8; it's human nature. But to the point, is 1.8 seconds and a few extra standard features worth the price difference? I guess one could ask whether it's worth it to spend $60-150K on an SUV in the first place. Purely a matter of subjective taste. V6, V8, or TT we're all pretty fortunate to be able to indulge ourselves with this kind of purchase.

Cheers.
Old 01-09-2012, 09:09 AM
  #40  
WFBlue
Advanced
 
WFBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

@ Mike.
Old 01-10-2012, 02:39 AM
  #41  
RESP
Burning Brakes
 
RESP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Mike, you have it straight. We are justifying what we bought and enjoy it regardless.
Old 01-10-2012, 03:10 AM
  #42  
rijowysock
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
rijowysock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Arctic Cold
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
Actually 1.8 seconds between tip V6 and V8 but who's counting...... Seriously, in no way do I mean to disparage the V6. Is it more than adequate for almost any situation? Absolutely. You might notice the difference on occasion when towing, or in certain highway situations as you've described, but in any case it's not a big deal. FWIW, I think it's just as possible that someone who spent $14K less for their V6 might be trying to justify their decision as much as the person who spent more for a V8; it's human nature. But to the point, is 1.8 seconds and a few extra standard features worth the price difference? I guess one could ask whether it's worth it to spend $60-150K on an SUV in the first place. Purely a matter of subjective taste. V6, V8, or TT we're all pretty fortunate to be able to indulge ourselves with this kind of purchase.

Cheers.
good reply..

i forgot the 7.1 was the manual trans..
Old 01-10-2012, 11:48 PM
  #43  
GVA-SFO
Rennlist Member
 
GVA-SFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,461
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Being a bit "off topic", Riley, you may love that one :
Recently, a French magazine did a test on a cargo runway (long) and tried different cars to see which can do 0 to 300 km/h (close to 200mph), and ..the Pan Turbo S, did it, in 40.7 sec, or : quite brilliantly, ..i.e.: better than an R8 V10 !
Note that they went over, up to 310, ..which is quite close to 200mph (about 320)

Last edited by GVA-SFO; 01-11-2012 at 12:11 AM.
Old 01-12-2012, 04:18 PM
  #44  
rijowysock
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
rijowysock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Arctic Cold
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GVA-SFO
Being a bit "off topic", Riley, you may love that one :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXRP0525SzQ
Recently, a French magazine did a test on a cargo runway (long) and tried different cars to see which can do 0 to 300 km/h (close to 200mph), and ..the Pan Turbo S, did it, in 40.7 sec, or : quite brilliantly, ..i.e.: better than an R8 V10 !
Note that they went over, up to 310, ..which is quite close to 200mph (about 320)
great video, the turbo is a BEAST... every time i floored it it just surprised the hell out of me with the sheer grunt... 0-100 was about the same as my lotus but 5-60 felt totally different, i think it's the torque... just kickd you HARD.
Old 01-12-2012, 05:34 PM
  #45  
jerry joseph
Pro
 
jerry joseph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rijowysock
great video, the turbo is a BEAST... every time i floored it it just surprised the hell out of me with the sheer grunt... 0-100 was about the same as my lotus but 5-60 felt totally different, i think it's the torque... just kickd you HARD.
Cool Video
285 km/h is the most I achieved with my 2011 CT
Might be able to hit 300 when I get my GIAC Ecu upgrade...
The CT does not stop pulling till about 255-260..then it takes a good mile to eek out the rest of the speed it has to give
PTV is very useful for getting into and out of turns harder than you thought possible...after which those ceramics do come in handy



Quick Reply: Quick pics. New 2012 with the new upgrades



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:44 PM.