2000 Boxster S --Does this look pretty low to you?
09-23-2012, 01:28 AM
#1
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2000 Boxster S --Does this look pretty low to you?
Bought this car 3 yrs ago and just ordered a ROW M030 supsension but I can't imagine it lowering the car any more over this. I could have the US M030 in it now (don't know) but those springs aren't any lower than the regular springs, right?
After ROW install...
After ROW install...
Last edited by Fttp; 10-12-2012 at 01:34 PM.
09-23-2012, 07:30 AM
#3
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the US M030 and I think it could be lowered another inch but then I would have to worry about driveways and humps. The rear is slightly higher than the front.
09-23-2012, 08:42 PM
#6
Intermediate
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What size tires? They look to be undersized, maybe a standard section width with a lower aspect ratio? ...maybe it is just the photo
Also, I can't get any info on the actual spring rate differences between the RoW and US M030. It appears the RoW springs are a little (like maybe 6-7mm) shorter, but I can't find anything that gives actual rates.
