?80k-7k?
#1
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
why are the 97-99 boxsters dropping in price so fast...32,000 miles 99 for under 7 grand.. new ones allmost 80grand thats 70,000 grand drop in ten years...im gona spend more then that when im done with my 83 944....i envy you boxster lovers i think after i fix my 944 ill sell it for a 2000 boxster....
#2
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
why are the 97-99 boxsters dropping in price so fast...32,000 miles 99 for under 7 grand.. new ones allmost 80grand thats 70,000 grand drop in ten years...im gona spend more then that when im done with my 83 944....i envy you boxster lovers i think after i fix my 944 ill sell it for a 2000 boxster....
Early Boxster on going on 15 years old.
I question your $70K to $80K price for early Boxsters. Only the very heavily optioned (everything but the kitchen sink cars and even then...) would approach that much money. (My 02 listed for around $47K in 02 and I bought it for $5K under list.)
Earlier models were priced a bit lower, but some buyers, early buyers anyhow probably paid a premium.
Still the depreciation has been severe.
Boxsters in general are getting a rep for serious engine troubles. We can argue about the chances of this happening but used car shoppers are more likely to visit forums to learn about the cars and what they learn puts them off the cars some. Has to.
The economy is in a downturn and 2 seat roadsters as nice of cars as these cars are are they not very practical cars. They are a 2nd or even a 3rd car for most of us.
This downturn has seen some used cars go up in value but they are models that can serve various functions from single occupant commuter car to a family hauler on weekends and so on. The Boxster is at the other end of the spectrum.
But for some shoppers there are some pretty good deals to be had.
Sincerely,
Macster.
#3
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Why - the cars have a reputation for being a money pit. And there's a certain amount of truth in it based on my experience with my 2000 S I bought a year ago. Plus there are a lot of nice used Miatas out there.
#4
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
probably because the average minivan is faster than a 2.5L boxster, most douchebags only care about straight line power so the market for a slow, 2 seat, foreign (german = expensive parts, right?) convertible car is limited to people who understand that their handling prowess is phenomenal and that they may have more maintenance issues than a Honda Civic.
#5
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A Miata might be a fine car but I do not want a Miata.
Sincerely,
Macster.
#6
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
why are the 97-99 boxsters dropping in price so fast...32,000 miles 99 for under 7 grand.. new ones allmost 80grand thats 70,000 grand drop in ten years...im gona spend more then that when im done with my 83 944....i envy you boxster lovers i think after i fix my 944 ill sell it for a 2000 boxster....
2001 Orient Red Metallic Boxster
#7
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Also recall that the 944 was a $20-50K car over its lifetime and is now a $2-5K car "all day long" ![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Early boxsters were also built in very large numbers (some 100K or more) in just a few years which also hurts value. Age, Mileage.. are other killers. No factory racing program.. they aren't 911's.. take your pick of reasons. Early engine issues (slipped sleeves, porus blocks, IMS and RMS issues too) don't help much.
I do say, near me, most "early boxsters" are offered more in the $9-14K range than the $7K range.
Lots of salvage and flood damaged boxsters out there too.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Early boxsters were also built in very large numbers (some 100K or more) in just a few years which also hurts value. Age, Mileage.. are other killers. No factory racing program.. they aren't 911's.. take your pick of reasons. Early engine issues (slipped sleeves, porus blocks, IMS and RMS issues too) don't help much.
I do say, near me, most "early boxsters" are offered more in the $9-14K range than the $7K range.
Lots of salvage and flood damaged boxsters out there too.
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i was thinking of buying one only for the reason it was 6,800 neg with 32k miles and mint inside and out..just on looks alone ud think no lower then 20grand for a car like this i think there shape is the same as the 80k 911 and other higher priced porsches....whats the engine specs if anyone knows on a 97 and 99? the 2.5lt i think and i just saw 201 h/p which in my saab turbo 80-140 i never had a car catch up with me..it had 180 stock i added maybe 30h/p...so these 97-99 are money pits ..all the ones i see are Convertible..i cant see going wrong for 6,800 with 32k miles just on looks?you cant even get a 2000 ford taurus for that price..where they really that bad?what engine or problems did they have if you dont mind?
thanks soo much
thanks soo much
#9
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, various factors.
Early Boxster on going on 15 years old.
I question your $70K to $80K price for early Boxsters. Only the very heavily optioned (everything but the kitchen sink cars and even then...) would approach that much money. (My 02 listed for around $47K in 02 and I bought it for $5K under list.)
Earlier models were priced a bit lower, but some buyers, early buyers anyhow probably paid a premium.
Still the depreciation has been severe.
Boxsters in general are getting a rep for serious engine troubles. We can argue about the chances of this happening but used car shoppers are more likely to visit forums to learn about the cars and what they learn puts them off the cars some. Has to.
The economy is in a downturn and 2 seat roadsters as nice of cars as these cars are are they not very practical cars. They are a 2nd or even a 3rd car for most of us.
This downturn has seen some used cars go up in value but they are models that can serve various functions from single occupant commuter car to a family hauler on weekends and so on. The Boxster is at the other end of the spectrum.
But for some shoppers there are some pretty good deals to be had.
Sincerely,
Macster.
Early Boxster on going on 15 years old.
I question your $70K to $80K price for early Boxsters. Only the very heavily optioned (everything but the kitchen sink cars and even then...) would approach that much money. (My 02 listed for around $47K in 02 and I bought it for $5K under list.)
Earlier models were priced a bit lower, but some buyers, early buyers anyhow probably paid a premium.
Still the depreciation has been severe.
Boxsters in general are getting a rep for serious engine troubles. We can argue about the chances of this happening but used car shoppers are more likely to visit forums to learn about the cars and what they learn puts them off the cars some. Has to.
The economy is in a downturn and 2 seat roadsters as nice of cars as these cars are are they not very practical cars. They are a 2nd or even a 3rd car for most of us.
This downturn has seen some used cars go up in value but they are models that can serve various functions from single occupant commuter car to a family hauler on weekends and so on. The Boxster is at the other end of the spectrum.
But for some shoppers there are some pretty good deals to be had.
Sincerely,
Macster.
![order](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/order.gif)
#10
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Porsche's are owned by the 1%... maybe no one wants them anymore ![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Do a search for M96 motors. Lots on the subject.
RMS
IMS
Coolant tank
Computer failures if under drivers seat gets wet
motor mounts
2.5s had issues with "slipped sleeves" and "porous blocks". By now they have likely been addressed.
Many seem to suggest a version with miles/frequent use might be better than one that sits a lot.
Macster seems to have enjoyed quite a bit of use/success with his. Some, less so.
They are all fun to drive. Great handling. Convenient to use top. Great sound about 4K rpm. Nice high (but not honda high) redline.
Then usual "used car" items to consider. Clean title? Accident damage? Torn tops, cracked rear window? A PPI would be encouraged no mater the price.
'97-99 = first gen 986. 2.5L 201hp. About 2800lb.
'00-02 = 2nd gen 986 2.7 217 hp
'03-04 = 3rd gen 986 2.7 228hp
In '00 there were a host of interior upgrades and options. In '03, more changes (bumpers) as well as introduction of a glass rear window
'00 also saw the intro of the "S" - 3.2L 250hp, 6speed
They are ONLY made as convertible. There was a factory removeable hard top available. A Boxster "coupe" is a Cayman
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Do a search for M96 motors. Lots on the subject.
RMS
IMS
Coolant tank
Computer failures if under drivers seat gets wet
motor mounts
2.5s had issues with "slipped sleeves" and "porous blocks". By now they have likely been addressed.
Many seem to suggest a version with miles/frequent use might be better than one that sits a lot.
Macster seems to have enjoyed quite a bit of use/success with his. Some, less so.
They are all fun to drive. Great handling. Convenient to use top. Great sound about 4K rpm. Nice high (but not honda high) redline.
Then usual "used car" items to consider. Clean title? Accident damage? Torn tops, cracked rear window? A PPI would be encouraged no mater the price.
'97-99 = first gen 986. 2.5L 201hp. About 2800lb.
'00-02 = 2nd gen 986 2.7 217 hp
'03-04 = 3rd gen 986 2.7 228hp
In '00 there were a host of interior upgrades and options. In '03, more changes (bumpers) as well as introduction of a glass rear window
'00 also saw the intro of the "S" - 3.2L 250hp, 6speed
They are ONLY made as convertible. There was a factory removeable hard top available. A Boxster "coupe" is a Cayman
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#12
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
2001 Orient Red Metallic Boxster
#13
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would buy a $7K Boxster just to part it out.
The 97-99 engine issues really don't help matters when you're already dealing with a shrinking buyer pool of well informed buyers.
Last I checked 996 resale values were nothing to write home about either. Particularly the Turbos, which were certainly regarded as being in the highest echelon of sports car and have taken a severe pounding.
The 97-99 engine issues really don't help matters when you're already dealing with a shrinking buyer pool of well informed buyers.
Last I checked 996 resale values were nothing to write home about either. Particularly the Turbos, which were certainly regarded as being in the highest echelon of sports car and have taken a severe pounding.