LOWER CONTROL ARMS - the best solution is here.
#1
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
![Exclamation](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon4.gif)
Why mess around with solutions NOT designed for your Cayman?
Not nearly enough negative camber?
Lack of adjustability?
Well, problem solved.
![](http://www.planet-9.com/attachments/cayman-boxster-competition/17213d1298833319-lowr-control-arms-best-solution-here-rss_controlarm_1.jpg)
Contact me via e-mail, you will be happy ya did ...
Not nearly enough negative camber?
Lack of adjustability?
Well, problem solved.
![](http://www.planet-9.com/attachments/cayman-boxster-competition/17213d1298833319-lowr-control-arms-best-solution-here-rss_controlarm_1.jpg)
Contact me via e-mail, you will be happy ya did ...
#4
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
These are billet (stronger/lighter), and the outer "ball joints" or in this case "mono-*****" are serviceable. And these are actually cheaper than the PMS versions if I'm not mistaken. These are what I'm going to be using on my Boxsteru.
#6
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I could tell the billet and the mono-ball parts,those are pretty obvious, I really meant is there anything different in the design , size, angle.
Trending Topics
#8
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Absolutely the highest of high quality machine work, incredible hardware, nothing left on the table for improvement, the best of the best.
Multiple adjustments from 1mm to 7mm, lighter stronger, more direct, WAY more negative camber, serviceable monoball joints.
***E-mail us at rennstore@comcast.net***
Multiple adjustments from 1mm to 7mm, lighter stronger, more direct, WAY more negative camber, serviceable monoball joints.
***E-mail us at rennstore@comcast.net***
Last edited by TrackDays247.com; 07-08-2011 at 07:04 PM.
#9
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
They look great and I've installed a few sets myself. No reason to go with the more expensive Porsche ones anymore. I would have them on my own car if we were allowed to run the monoball stuff in Boxster Spec.
#11
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree that these are way better quality than the rough porsche castings. Nice smoot surface means no "stress raisers" that cause metal fatigue failure. I'm just waiting for my custom dampers to be delivered before installing these.
#13
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
These are a work of art and I would have them if they were legal for spec boxster (i did hear a rumor though).
Craig, question for you how do you get "way more negative camber" ? You must be comparing them to stock vs the GT3 2 piece arm they are a clone of? Also, when you look at the pictures there is a hidden "feature" not being touted and it is massively important to racers.
Craig, question for you how do you get "way more negative camber" ? You must be comparing them to stock vs the GT3 2 piece arm they are a clone of? Also, when you look at the pictures there is a hidden "feature" not being touted and it is massively important to racers.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)