Center of Gravity 986/987
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was reading about the Lexus LFA supercar where they were touting a ~17" high center of gravity and how it was very good.
That got me thinking about the center of gravity of a Boxster however I couldn't find a number online. Anyone have an idea how well the boxster stacks up? I would guess very well given the flat-6.
That got me thinking about the center of gravity of a Boxster however I couldn't find a number online. Anyone have an idea how well the boxster stacks up? I would guess very well given the flat-6.
#3
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was reading about the Lexus LFA supercar where they were touting a ~17" high center of gravity and how it was very good.
That got me thinking about the center of gravity of a Boxster however I couldn't find a number online. Anyone have an idea how well the boxster stacks up? I would guess very well given the flat-6.
That got me thinking about the center of gravity of a Boxster however I couldn't find a number online. Anyone have an idea how well the boxster stacks up? I would guess very well given the flat-6.
The LFA is a supercar and is a much newer design so attention and money can be expended to do whatever the designers think the car needs and apparently a 17" high CG was deemed a need.
The Boxster's flat 6 engine doesn't sit all that low cause the engine's quite wide and for a flat 6 tall.
Lack of dry sump means the oil sump under the engine causes the engine to be mounted higher. Another factor is the IMS that sits under the crankshaft. And then the size/diameter of the clutch. Remember the Carrera GT came with a very small diameter clutch which allowed the car designers to lower the engine in the car to lower the car's CG.
However, the Boxster's pretty light up high -- soft top and for the pre-2003 cars a plastic rear window -- and that helps to lower the car's CG.
And finally anyone who's driven a Boxster knows it is no slouch when it comes to handling and while the car almost certainly doesn't have a 17" high CG wherever it is it is at a good place.
Sincerely,
Macster
#4
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seems like it would be easy to measure the CG. Just get a two by four and tip the car on its side balancing the door on the 2x4. Then just measure from the 2x4 to the bottom of a wheel. Easy! Why doesn't someone do it and let us know.
#5
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Macster,
I forgot that the engine isn't dry sump, that makes a pretty big difference on how low you can go. We can however compensate by sitting low in the seat, right? Haha
00r101, Sure I'll just go out and do that when it warms up outside. If someone has a pre-wrecked Boxster maybe they would be kind enough to try
Seriously though you could probably mount an accelerometer or two at different vertical locations to get this data, too bad I don't have a couple handy...
I forgot that the engine isn't dry sump, that makes a pretty big difference on how low you can go. We can however compensate by sitting low in the seat, right? Haha
00r101, Sure I'll just go out and do that when it warms up outside. If someone has a pre-wrecked Boxster maybe they would be kind enough to try
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)