EVOMS customer Power -is it real ?
06-13-2009, 12:54 PM
#61
Instructor
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am a EVT700 equiped 997tt owner.I am not in US but NZ,same fuel grand as uk,I use BP 98 RON for street drive..
My car has extra mod beyond EVT700 are IPD plenum and cat-less exhaust.I have dynoed my car in local torque dyno,a NZ developed mustang system,very similer to mustang tech.I can't make that much power as the UK EVT700 or US evt700 showed.With BP 98 my car made 511awhp @1.3 bar,and with 105 vp unleaded race fuel my car made 538awhp @1.5 bar( in sport model).The dyno provider told me base on his system the 997tt awd trans should caculate as a 22% power loss.So my true engine power is 655hp with bp98 and 689hp with 105 race fuel.
I still trying the 60-130 run,just found the vacuum lane losing from the FPR,will get it reconnect next week and make a proper 60-130 run to provide the EVT700 power.The best time I had is 7.52 secs on a 4% incline road.
So this is pretty much what evt700 is.Remember I have 2 extra beyond the EVT700 package.So you guys have some probable ideas.
My car has extra mod beyond EVT700 are IPD plenum and cat-less exhaust.I have dynoed my car in local torque dyno,a NZ developed mustang system,very similer to mustang tech.I can't make that much power as the UK EVT700 or US evt700 showed.With BP 98 my car made 511awhp @1.3 bar,and with 105 vp unleaded race fuel my car made 538awhp @1.5 bar( in sport model).The dyno provider told me base on his system the 997tt awd trans should caculate as a 22% power loss.So my true engine power is 655hp with bp98 and 689hp with 105 race fuel.
I still trying the 60-130 run,just found the vacuum lane losing from the FPR,will get it reconnect next week and make a proper 60-130 run to provide the EVT700 power.The best time I had is 7.52 secs on a 4% incline road.
So this is pretty much what evt700 is.Remember I have 2 extra beyond the EVT700 package.So you guys have some probable ideas.
06-13-2009, 12:56 PM
#62
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Something new to me regarding this discussion of US tuners vs. European tuners...
I have noticed US tuners are criticized in Europe for bolting on too much hp without doing internal strengthening. I noticed on the 9FF site that they feel it is safe to bolt on 670hp to a 997 GT-2 block without internals. Most US tuners say it is safe to bolt on 700hp before you need to do internal modification with is not much different than 9FF. There are some exceptions to this rule among US tuners I realize.
From the 9FF website:
http://9ff.de/_downloads/artikel/9ff_gt2_670_boldon.pdf
I have noticed US tuners are criticized in Europe for bolting on too much hp without doing internal strengthening. I noticed on the 9FF site that they feel it is safe to bolt on 670hp to a 997 GT-2 block without internals. Most US tuners say it is safe to bolt on 700hp before you need to do internal modification with is not much different than 9FF. There are some exceptions to this rule among US tuners I realize.
From the 9FF website:
http://9ff.de/_downloads/artikel/9ff_gt2_670_boldon.pdf
9ff do not have a good reputation in Europe - they like their marketing tho' but many times there cars break down and embarrassingly when they arrive for one of the many magazine articles they do. Having said that they certainly and almost uniquely in Europe aim for the mega hp numbers - It is by limiting the torque to 820NM that 9ff hope to keep the rods true, this seems to be the limit for Euro use
06-13-2009, 01:13 PM
#63
6th Gear
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didnt purchase everything 1 time,it a slowly built up...proto offered better price for the upgrade VTGs so I got upgraded turbos from them,and they claiming they did modification in both compresor wheel and exhaust wheels...
06-13-2009, 06:37 PM
#64
Advanced
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: new york
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-26-2009, 01:43 PM
#66
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
So if we take 60-160mph through the gears:
9ff 600hp = 17s
9ff 730hp = 13.6s
EVO 727hp = 16.2s
Not on this topic but I had a new "tuning module" put on my GT2 today alongside the aerospace intercoolers. 200 cell cats and race headers.
During testing we ran a 60-160mph which took 13.45s (in 27degC heat 2 passengers)
This was starting in 3rd so not directly comparable to the ones in the magazine test but interesting all the same...... (60-130 was 7.4s)
9ff 600hp = 17s
9ff 730hp = 13.6s
EVO 727hp = 16.2s
Not on this topic but I had a new "tuning module" put on my GT2 today alongside the aerospace intercoolers. 200 cell cats and race headers.
During testing we ran a 60-160mph which took 13.45s (in 27degC heat 2 passengers)
This was starting in 3rd so not directly comparable to the ones in the magazine test but interesting all the same...... (60-130 was 7.4s)
06-30-2009, 01:56 PM
#67
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Have to put a caveat in here.....it seems that this "tuning box" which I am trialing is giving the engine over 600hp.... just done some more testing and the car seems significantly faster than the Manthey 600hp car tested eg 80kph-200kph Manthey car took 8.1s mine is taking 7.3s !
07-01-2009, 10:55 AM
#68
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
another data point: new Chevy ZR1 Blue Devil (630 hp) pulls 172mph in standing mile. 9:30 mark
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6muw6...axa_popt00us03
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6muw6...axa_popt00us03
07-01-2009, 01:51 PM
#69
07-21-2009, 03:09 PM
#70
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
