Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Suspension Changes - Your Thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2012, 03:59 PM
  #16  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Thanks Rad!
So it is purely an engine moving issue?
Mostly. It is the entire engine/tranny moving. I have the same problems with the Cayman.

So, a stiffer tranny mount + stiffer engine mounts + Cup Shifter Cables: problem gone. Just avoid the Cup tranny mount, the interior sound (grinding) is extremely loud. I think the PDEM are a gizmo and they are not as stiff as a proper stiff static engine mount. Chat with Eddie, Wevo and TS have some nice stuff for trakcar 1.1.

Just adding a stiffer transmission mount doesn't fix the problem.
Old 06-21-2012, 04:18 PM
  #17  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 258 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
Mostly. It is the entire engine/tranny moving. I have the same problems with the Cayman.

So, a stiffer tranny mount + stiffer engine mounts + Cup Shifter Cables: problem gone. Just avoid the Cup tranny mount, the interior sound (grinding) is extremely loud. I think the PDEM are a gizmo and they are not as stiff as a proper stiff static engine mount. Chat with Eddie, Wevo and TS have some nice stuff for trakcar 1.1.

Just adding a stiffer transmission mount doesn't fix the problem.
Yep. Had the same shifting problem with my M3, and urethane engine mounts are what fixed the problem. Stop the bigger mass from moving first (engine), then worry about the tranny. Tranny mounts just compliment the engine mounts with a more direct feel, and help transmit all the power more efficiently.

WEVO's seem to work great, I prefer a static stiffness...for the same reasons I prefer linear springs.

Urethane is great, but once you start putting in solid (metal) subframe, engine, and tranny mounts, go ahead and kiss all streetability goodbye. The M3 never sees the street...
Old 06-21-2012, 08:12 PM
  #18  
CRex
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Driver's Seat
Posts: 3,581
Received 386 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
Mostly. It is the entire engine/tranny moving. I have the same problems with the Cayman.

So, a stiffer tranny mount + stiffer engine mounts + Cup Shifter Cables: problem gone. Just avoid the Cup tranny mount, the interior sound (grinding) is extremely loud. I think the PDEM are a gizmo and they are not as stiff as a proper stiff static engine mount. Chat with Eddie, Wevo and TS have some nice stuff for trakcar 1.1.

Just adding a stiffer transmission mount doesn't fix the problem.
+1 LOL, tried exactly that (cup tranny mount) and the vibrations were INCREDIBLE. Pretty graphical (and conclusive) proof that PDEM doesn't hold the engine in place that rigidly.

BTW a while ago there's talk that PDEM is prone to failing on 997.2 cars. Is there any objective way of testing their functionality?
Old 06-21-2012, 08:16 PM
  #19  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: All Ate Up With Motor
Posts: 41,862
Received 1,686 Likes on 872 Posts
Default

IMO, sways are the last things to fiddle with when setting up a suspension. They affect the transition of load from weighted to unweighted wheel, and vice versa. If you just want a flatter car on turn in & in corners, consider upping spring rates, presuming the dampers are appropriately valved.
Old 06-21-2012, 08:23 PM
  #20  
CRex
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Driver's Seat
Posts: 3,581
Received 386 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
How many have actually done this mod?
Here. Tried the cup transmission mount for one week and promptly had it removed. NVH so bad that I practically feared that the vibrations may tear the car apart. It was a fun exercise...

Originally Posted by Mvez
http://www.torquesolution.com/product-p/ts-por-006.htmInteresting. When my tranny comes out for a re-gear, I might look into this. Urethane tranny mounts on my M3 worked nicely.
Mvez this mount gets stressed than you think. Urethane is tough but has lower stress/fatigue tolerance than metal. U sure u want the whole tranny+engine mass to be attached by a piece of plastic? When I had the solid mount I was told the cup cars replaced the part with every transmission rebuild...

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
If you want to have a fun moment. Place a GoPro under the car at a track day, and look at that tranny move a lot. 700 lbs of combined pendulum weight in between tranny and engine makes for unwanted loss of grip.
Cool idea! Video coming your way soon...
Old 06-21-2012, 08:31 PM
  #21  
CRex
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Driver's Seat
Posts: 3,581
Received 386 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
IMO, sways are the last things to fiddle with when setting up a suspension. They affect the transition of load from weighted to unweighted wheel, and vice versa. If you just want a flatter car on turn in & in corners, consider upping spring rates, presuming the dampers are appropriately valved.
Point taken... car is on OEM springs and shocks. Too chicken to dive headfirst into the waters of spring and shocks mod. Not enough racing expertise in this part of the world and too many snake oil salesmen. Plenty of folks who can install the latest and greatest but when you ask them about the proper spring rates and rebound settings for a particular track everybody goes quiet.

FWIW, the Carrera Cup Asia Series which runs all the relevant tracks here (Zhuhai, Ordos, Sepang) disallows spring changes. Which takes away the teams' incentives to experiment and build that requisite knowledge base...

So in short, springs and shocks have to stay stock out of practical consideration.
Old 06-21-2012, 08:52 PM
  #22  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,828
Received 3,633 Likes on 2,359 Posts
Default

I'm prodding Alex @ SW to figure out an RS 4.0 "upgrade" pack for those of us not wealthy enough to buy anything other than the dive planes!

Old 06-21-2012, 09:40 PM
  #23  
senna
Burning Brakes
 
senna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you think the dive planes made any difference?
Old 06-21-2012, 09:45 PM
  #24  
CRex
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Driver's Seat
Posts: 3,581
Received 386 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by senna
Do you think the dive planes made any difference?
Only on the highway. We get stretches of real good, autobahn-like multi-lanes around here and can take occasionally take our cars above 300khm (190 old school). Above 220-240 the car used to exhibit a bit of lightness with its nose. With the dive planes it's planted all the way.

On track? Not feeling any difference to be honest. I think it'll take Walter Rohrl or somebody his league to articulate the improvement if any...
Old 06-22-2012, 11:30 AM
  #25  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,828
Received 3,633 Likes on 2,359 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by senna
Do you think the dive planes made any difference?
I neither have the innate skill nor the telemetry to detect a difference!
Old 06-22-2012, 11:58 AM
  #26  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 182 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
IMO, sways are the last things to fiddle with when setting up a suspension. They affect the transition of load from weighted to unweighted wheel, and vice versa. If you just want a flatter car on turn in & in corners, consider upping spring rates, presuming the dampers are appropriately valved.
Crap...I had Orbit make up some adjustable sways for the "lowly wanna be" aero beetle GTS. I have the so called crappy Sport PASM stock shocks/springs and couldn't afford $4-5k in new coil overs and I wanted to tame some of the body lean and have adjustable sways. I guess I'm just wasting money....
Old 06-22-2012, 12:24 PM
  #27  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mdrums
Crap...I had Orbit make up some adjustable sways for the "lowly wanna be" aero beetle GTS. I have the so called crappy Sport PASM stock shocks/springs and couldn't afford $4-5k in new coil overs and I wanted to tame some of the body lean and have adjustable sways. I guess I'm just wasting money....
Adjustable ARB are never a waste of money, the allow you to balance the car for different tire sizes, older vs newer tires on a given axle, tight tracks, open tracks.

Not having adjustable ARB in my Fiat has been the biggest downside of sharing the car for autoX and track.
Old 06-22-2012, 12:54 PM
  #28  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by senna
Do you think the dive planes made any difference?
At 125 mph, per independent wind tunnel test (Sport Auto in Germany), the dive planes add 6.6 lbs of front downforce, and the 4.0 end plates and new wing angle add 20 lbs.

IMHO, the gains are insignificant. There are more gains from a gurney lip and reducing ride height.
Old 06-22-2012, 12:59 PM
  #29  
85Gold
Rennlist Member
 
85Gold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 92 miles from Sebring
Posts: 5,093
Received 815 Likes on 467 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
Adjustable ARB are never a waste of money, the allow you to balance the car for different tire sizes, older vs newer tires on a given axle, tight tracks, open tracks.

Not having adjustable ARB in my Fiat has been the biggest downside of sharing the car for autoX and track.
Mike,

What Rad said.

Peter
Old 06-22-2012, 01:08 PM
  #30  
drl
Rennlist Member
 
drl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Encinitas
Posts: 1,636
Received 138 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Sure do look cool though. But for me, not $500 cool.


Quick Reply: Suspension Changes - Your Thoughts?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:55 AM.