Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

997 GT3.mk1 PASM re-valve begins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2011, 03:15 PM
  #16  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997gt3north
Mini Update:

I will be going with a Swift spring as it was available.

The Swift Spring specs
Part Number Z60-228-080
228 is spring length in mm - stock is 223, so almost perfect for minimal adjustment
080 is for 80N/mm or approx 450# spring
Get the shortest Swift (6") and add a 6" zero rate Hyperco Tender with Genesis Isolators.

That's the setup I'm running in the Fiat. I went from stock shocks, to stiffer springs on stock shocks, even stiffer springs with Moton 3-way, th some other springs with Moton, tested F430 Challenge srping/shocks, and ultimately went back to stock shocks on springs that are 300% stiffer than stock (rear Fiat springs at 1800#). From all the tested setups the one now is the nicest one (and cheap), works on streets, autoX, Sebring and the glass smooth tracks.

My current setup is lighter than the stock Titanium springs. Less unsprung weight.

Here are the parts you need:
http://store01.prostores.com/servlet...Detail?no=3277

http://store01.prostores.com/servlet...Detail?no=3270

Use 60mm ID, but if they are not made, you can use 2.5" instead with your stock struts and 60 ID main springs.

I use Swift springs as well, they are lighter and more consistent across the compression range. Really good stuff (and cheap)
Old 07-25-2011, 12:49 AM
  #17  
drabe
Advanced
 
drabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 54
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Would the front spring for the GT2RS work?
Old 07-26-2011, 11:52 AM
  #18  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 0
Received 230 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Porterfield keeps Swift springs in-stock. I already bought mine. Thought about the shorter spring stack, but I'll do that once I'm ready to tinker with the rear springs as well. Need to have a custom rear spring hat made for 60mm or 2.25 ID.

After a stiffer front spring upgrade, I'm questioning the need for a bigger front bar (you only need so much adjustability). Drop links and a bigger rear sway bar are what the car really needs.
Old 07-26-2011, 04:47 PM
  #19  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,783
Received 3,601 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sharkster
This is great news mate... keep me posted
what do you think about the tarret monoball "ends" as an alternative to the RSS control arms, so you get to keep the Porsche arm just replacing the bolted end with the monoball?

http://www.tarett.com/items/996-997-...996-detail.htm

and ...

http://www.tarett.com/items/996-997-...a01-detail.htm
Old 07-26-2011, 08:25 PM
  #20  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,783
Received 3,601 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

interesting article in this months "Total 911" about the 9ff G-Track 480; they retained the PASM dampers and added custom H&R springs rated (f) 60kg and (r) 120kg with helpers ...
Old 07-26-2011, 10:09 PM
  #21  
997gt3north
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
997gt3north's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
interesting article in this months "Total 911" about the 9ff G-Track 480; they retained the PASM dampers and added custom H&R springs rated (f) 60kg and (r) 120kg with helpers ...
If this 60kg is = 6.0kgf/ mm = 60 N/mm,

Then,
60kg = 336#
120kg = 672#

Somewhat interesting, the B16 Damptronic I believe uses a very similar front #, and then 3.8 RS uses 115N/mm or just less than 650#s.

As a comparison, the KW clubsport suspension
Was - 350/950
Is now - 400/1000

I find it interesting that the German guys seem to consistently run softer front and more rear thus larger spread than the standard American Moton Specs is 500/700, 600/800, 700/900, etc.
Old 07-27-2011, 09:13 AM
  #22  
AudiOn19s
Race Car
 
AudiOn19s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 4,511
Received 47 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997gt3north
I find it interesting that the German guys seem to consistently run softer front and more rear thus larger spread than the standard American Moton Specs is 500/700, 600/800, 700/900, etc.
I'm with you on this one. I had H&R RSS Clubsport coilovers on my old C2 and the published spring rates were 450/900. That car drove pretty nicely but I was suprised with how much rear bar (GT3 bars) I had to use in the car to get it to turn like I wanted.

My current GT3 has JRZ Triples on it with measly 600/750 springs, is probably 100lbs heavier than my old C2 and still drives better.

To this day I still try to understand why some use a huge split and others don't.

There are a few tuners out there running the same spring rate front and rear as well and they swear by it.
Old 07-27-2011, 05:01 PM
  #23  
That Guy
Advanced
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 60
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Go Ohlins...

... and don't look back. Nothing else quite like 'em, and the GT cars have the chassis rigidity to fully communicate every adjustment.

Turn-key kits are available for 997 GT3 applications, two-way adjustable (low speed comp & reb), upgradable to three-, four-, or five-way if you feel the need to really get in over your head (or run data acquisition)!

You lose the PASM but the TTX damper w/ inline reservoir allows easy access to adjuster *****, so reaching behind the wheels to switch between street and track settings is simple.

Pricing should be comparable w/ Moton, perhaps a bit more than a Damptronic kit. Worth looking into for those so inclined, IMO.
Old 07-27-2011, 05:23 PM
  #24  
911SLOW
Admin
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
911SLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Athens
Posts: 11,010
Likes: 0
Received 126 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997gt3north
If this 60kg is = 6.0kgf/ mm = 60 N/mm,

Then,
60kg = 336#
120kg = 672#

Somewhat interesting, the B16 Damptronic I believe uses a very similar front #, and then 3.8 RS uses 115N/mm or just less than 650#s.

As a comparison, the KW clubsport suspension
Was - 350/950
Is now - 400/1000

I find it interesting that the German guys seem to consistently run softer front and more rear thus larger spread than the standard American Moton Specs is 500/700, 600/800, 700/900, etc.

To confuse you even more, note that the same German tuner that promotes the wide gap in rates between F / R for the street cars, setups the cup cars (for the same track) with almost equal F and R springs, which matches what the factory does to begin with.

https://rennlist.com/forums/porsche-...re-set-up.html
Old 07-27-2011, 06:13 PM
  #25  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,783
Received 3,601 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

I believe that the damptronic is an "upgrade" for a 7.1 but I wonder if it so for a 7.2 ...

do "we" know what the Damptronic (what a name - where was marketing) spring rates (and matching valving) are?
Old 07-27-2011, 06:48 PM
  #26  
Terry L
Rennlist Member
 
Terry L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
I believe that the damptronic is an "upgrade" for a 7.1 but I wonder if it so for a 7.2 ...

do "we" know what the Damptronic (what a name - where was marketing) spring rates (and matching valving) are?
Yes - around 350/650.
Old 07-27-2011, 08:11 PM
  #27  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,783
Received 3,601 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Terry L
Yes - around 350/650.
sorry ... I wasnt paying enough attention to the thread... I should have seen that in earlier post!

damptronic then might be a reasonable compromise for those of us that dont want to abandon PASM ...
Old 07-27-2011, 11:11 PM
  #28  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 180 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
what do you think about the tarret monoball "ends" as an alternative to the RSS control arms, so you get to keep the Porsche arm just replacing the bolted end with the monoball?

http://www.tarett.com/items/996-997-...996-detail.htm

and ...

http://www.tarett.com/items/996-997-...a01-detail.htm
I'm looking also to see what others think. I have been told this is a great little upgrade and really helps with turn in.
Old 07-27-2011, 11:27 PM
  #29  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,783
Received 3,601 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mdrums
I'm looking also to see what others think. I have been told this is a great little upgrade and really helps with turn in.
maya be cheaper/simpler than exchanging the entire control arm ala the RSS solution...
Old 07-27-2011, 11:49 PM
  #30  
obsessedone
Rennlist Member
 
obsessedone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 279
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Terry, pleased to still be considered a friend. Look forward to dualing with you at the Glen the next few days. I cheated and went up to the Glen Monday and Tuesday open track with Kojote to practice. Great event, I ran six 45 minute sessions per day, killed some tires and wore myself out.

Originally Posted by Terry L
In retrospect, I think the B-16 Damptronic is a compromise which didn't work. It is still OK on the street and the car definitely turns in better than it did before, but it is still too soft in the soft position. On the other hand, the stiff position is really unusable except maybe if the track is made of glass and it really makes the car nervous. I am 2 seconds a lap faster around the Glen in soft rather than stiff. I'm no expert but it seems like the springs and the shocks don't work together on the stiff setting. I drove a friend's GT3 with Motons and heavier springs and, although I was hesitant to push the envelope, the car seemed more comfortable and also better planted and less nervous. I am curious about the TPC solution but it is awfully pricey to keep your old shocks and get an electronic massage, even though it is Mike's secret sauce. I'm curious to see how your experiment works out.


Quick Reply: 997 GT3.mk1 PASM re-valve begins



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:07 AM.