Autocar 997 Mk2 GT3 RS first drive
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#5
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I thought the gearing was going to be a lot shorter 77 mph in 2nd and 106 mph in 3rd seems really too long. The non RS GT3 gears must be really, really long.
#7
Rennlist Member
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
#9
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The article is pretty interesting.
How come a 2010 GT3 RS with the ultra wide wing generates just 170Kg (375 lbs) of downforce at 186mph? It is twice as much as the 2010 GT3, but...
The Viper ACR (ok it is too much) generates 1,000 lbs at 150 mph. Even the 2005 F430 (no wing) generates 616 lbs at 186mph.
0.1 secs quicker to 100 mph than the 2010 GT3? despite the extra 15Hp and the shorter gears?
How come a 2010 GT3 RS with the ultra wide wing generates just 170Kg (375 lbs) of downforce at 186mph? It is twice as much as the 2010 GT3, but...
The Viper ACR (ok it is too much) generates 1,000 lbs at 150 mph. Even the 2005 F430 (no wing) generates 616 lbs at 186mph.
0.1 secs quicker to 100 mph than the 2010 GT3? despite the extra 15Hp and the shorter gears?
#10
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The article is pretty interesting.
How come a 2010 GT3 RS with the ultra wide wing generates just 170Kg (375 lbs) of downforce at 186mph? It is twice as much as the 2010 GT3, but...
The Viper ACR (ok it is too much) generates 1,000 lbs at 150 mph. Even the 2005 F430 (no wing) generates 616 lbs at 186mph.
How come a 2010 GT3 RS with the ultra wide wing generates just 170Kg (375 lbs) of downforce at 186mph? It is twice as much as the 2010 GT3, but...
The Viper ACR (ok it is too much) generates 1,000 lbs at 150 mph. Even the 2005 F430 (no wing) generates 616 lbs at 186mph.
![](http://www.compositesworld.com/uploadedimages/Publications/CW/Articles/Internal/0509hpc_FOD_9.jpg)
#12
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
.1 is a joke but Porsche is always conservative on those performance numbers so my theory is that the marketing and product management people come up with them in a vacuum. They probably lay out a chart of all the 911 variants until they come up with the relative performance they want across all the models. One of the car mags (maybe C&D?) tested the GT3 at 3.7 sec I think.
#13
Drifting
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Belmont Shore in Long Beach CA
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
.1 is a joke but Porsche is always conservative on those performance numbers so my theory is that the marketing and product management people come up with them in a vacuum. They probably lay out a chart of all the 911 variants until they come up with the relative performance they want across all the models. One of the car mags (maybe C&D?) tested the GT3 at 3.7 sec I think.
Some german mag had three test drivers do 0 to 62 MPH in the latest 911 TT with PDK and Sport Chrono. Someone somewhere else said Porsche is really aiming at 2.9 seconds to 62 mph with the newer S variant Turbo. I'm just waiting for the 991 TT to come out.
#14
Instructor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
.1 is a joke but Porsche is always conservative on those performance numbers so my theory is that the marketing and product management people come up with them in a vacuum. They probably lay out a chart of all the 911 variants until they come up with the relative performance they want across all the models. One of the car mags (maybe C&D?) tested the GT3 at 3.7 sec I think.
Porsche engineered everything, they have the technology, but they engineered the Cayman below the 911 and above the Boxster just to capture market share.
#15
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The article is pretty interesting.
How come a 2010 GT3 RS with the ultra wide wing generates just 170Kg (375 lbs) of downforce at 186mph? It is twice as much as the 2010 GT3, but...
The Viper ACR (ok it is too much) generates 1,000 lbs at 150 mph. Even the 2005 F430 (no wing) generates 616 lbs at 186mph.
How come a 2010 GT3 RS with the ultra wide wing generates just 170Kg (375 lbs) of downforce at 186mph? It is twice as much as the 2010 GT3, but...
The Viper ACR (ok it is too much) generates 1,000 lbs at 150 mph. Even the 2005 F430 (no wing) generates 616 lbs at 186mph.