Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

997.1 RS vs 997.2 non-RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2009, 11:08 PM
  #16  
tcsracing1
Rennlist Member
 
tcsracing1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,106
Likes: 0
Received 256 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

today the 997.2 GT3 is a great car when compared to the 997.1 GT3RS.

in 5-10 years the RS will still be an interesting car, the non RS cars will be great performance bargins but not as interesting as the RS. The regular GT3's wil always be outdone by the model thereafter, but RS's will always have that little "something".

do you want that little "something"? is the question. ( personally, i kinda did. For the long haul, thus i went used RS.)

A well sorted RS has just as much a chance as any non RS 997.2 GT3 on any giving track at any given time.
Old 07-20-2009, 01:26 AM
  #17  
va122
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
va122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On Rennlist avoiding work
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

good points all.
Old 07-20-2009, 06:36 AM
  #18  
SpeedGeek
Pro
 
SpeedGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tcsracing1
A well sorted RS has just as much a chance as any non RS 997.2 GT3 on any giving track at any given time.
The new engine makes more power across the entire revband than the old one. The GT3.2 has more downforce than the RS.1, has improved brakes, improved suspension and can be spec'd with dynamic engine mounts.

The RS.1 is a fantastic car, but it has no chance against the GT3.2 on the track (given equal drivers).
Old 07-20-2009, 10:33 AM
  #19  
tcsracing1
Rennlist Member
 
tcsracing1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,106
Likes: 0
Received 256 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpeedGeek
The new engine makes more power across the entire revband than the old one. The GT3.2 has more downforce than the RS.1, has improved brakes, improved suspension and can be spec'd with dynamic engine mounts.

The RS.1 is a fantastic car, but it has no chance against the GT3.2 on the track (given equal drivers).

when i say sorted, i mean lightweight exhaust, good shocks, sways, monos, tires and alignment.

i would take the 'pepsi challenge' against a new out of box 997.2 GT3 all day long with that combo in a 997.1 GT3RS
Old 07-20-2009, 11:00 AM
  #20  
997gt3north
Drifting
 
997gt3north's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpeedGeek
The new engine makes more power across the entire revband than the old one. The GT3.2 has more downforce than the RS.1, has improved brakes, improved suspension and can be spec'd with dynamic engine mounts.

The RS.1 is a fantastic car, but it has no chance against the GT3.2 on the track (given equal drivers).
The new gt3 does not have more downforce than the old RS - it only has more front downforce - and by either dropping the front ride height by 1 inch or running the front cup spoiler this will make them equal

What is interesting is that when you look at that old post that shows the downforce specs of the gt3 versus the cupcar it is only the rear downforce that is substantially higher and in fact the cup (not rsr) appears to run with no downforce at all (just no lift)

The brakes are not improved either if we are comparing ceramics (not really anyway)

To me it is all the engine and weight - new car has more hp and without the sunroof it weighs the same - thus it is faster

The only thing the mk1 gt3/rs lacks was 'more hp' to keep up with the turbos on the straights

If the new RS has 450hp it will be the real thing - a 3000# car with good aero and enough hp to hang with most turbo cars on the straights

It is the hp disadvantage to cars like the z06 that kill you on tracks like Mosport - at least now it will only be 50hp and not 100

The other "advantage" wider rear track is not really an anvantage since it is so minimal - personally more tire in the front (better braking and turning) is preferable in my opinion (run the 235/35/19 hoosier) upfront and you will see what i mean. If the new RS actually lets you fit an even wider (275 type hoosier up front) it will be better yet again - but again just ordering the cup front fenders (only a discerning eye will see the difference) allows you to widen the front track with a spacer and run a 265 type tire up front - also, since the rear fender is not rolled, if you do roll it aggressively you can easily fit a 325 hoosier in the rear of the narrow body gt3 - thus 265/325

The new car is all about the 3.8 (everything else while a little better is really irrelevant) - and personally with the .2 litre displacement increase and the added 100rpms I think it is likely that they have understated the power by 10hp (as we can now see the noted specs that the rs will be 14hp higher (i have done a lot of work on intakes and don't buy for a second that it is worth 14hp)

The RS will hopefully add better track gearing (they really should also improve the LSD clutches) and between the titanium exhaust, some plastic windows lighter door trim and a lwfw should be able to come in 100#s lighter in total - 15 more hp and 100#s lighter has to be worth 1/2 second a lap - stock car to stock car per 60 second lap.

Last edited by 997gt3north; 07-20-2009 at 11:33 AM.
Old 07-20-2009, 12:44 PM
  #21  
triode
Rennlist Member
 
triode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,138
Received 69 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tcsracing1
when i say sorted, i mean lightweight exhaust, good shocks, sways, monos, tires and alignment.

i would take the 'pepsi challenge' against a new out of box 997.2 GT3 all day long with that combo in a 997.1 GT3RS
Specious argument - the 997.2 could also be modded and would in theory still retain its advantages vs. the 997.1. Stock vs stock, or modded vs modded is the comparison which is relevant. The OP's post implied stock vs. stock.
Old 07-21-2009, 12:12 AM
  #22  
tcsracing1
Rennlist Member
 
tcsracing1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,106
Likes: 0
Received 256 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by triode
Specious argument - the 997.2 could also be modded and would in theory still retain its advantages vs. the 997.1. Stock vs stock, or modded vs modded is the comparison which is relevant. The OP's post implied stock vs. stock.
i know, i know.....
Old 07-21-2009, 10:09 AM
  #23  
triode
Rennlist Member
 
triode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,138
Received 69 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tcsracing1
i know, i know.....
No sweat, I'm just jealous of your job, esp. the "flondling" part!
Old 07-21-2009, 06:30 PM
  #24  
buttons123
Instructor
 
buttons123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's a no brainer..... GT3 MK11
Old 05-01-2011, 12:27 PM
  #25  
datax
Burning Brakes
 
datax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern VA, DC
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone knows the production numbers on 997.1 RS and 997.2 GT3? Thanks.
Old 05-01-2011, 07:47 PM
  #26  
sin911
Rennlist Member
 
sin911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,118
Received 710 Likes on 432 Posts
Default

I'd go for a mkII since I'm a track guy. The reasons have already been mentioned a couple of times on the thread



Quick Reply: 997.1 RS vs 997.2 non-RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:23 PM.