New RUF CTR3 Video
#4
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
its awesome someone bothered to make this car but why take it over a cgt?
#6
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I dislike the rear end as well. Actually, any supercar that tries to hide, do without, or downplay a rear wing usually looks awful to me. It's completely unnatural and forced. How many GT racecars do you see without rear wings? I'd venture a guess at none. Even the CGT looks wrong to me with the rear wing in down position. Although it looks great with it up.
I can only imagine that people not used to looking at racecars think wings are tacky and out of place. However, if you look at it from the right perspective that they add stability and performance and usually the bigger the better, then things look very wrong without them.
I can only imagine that people not used to looking at racecars think wings are tacky and out of place. However, if you look at it from the right perspective that they add stability and performance and usually the bigger the better, then things look very wrong without them.
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree with you guys, something is not quite right with the rear. That being said, having owned a Ruf car (and not "really" a Ruf as it was a conversion), I suspect that the all sins will be forgiven when driven! The CGT is perfection IMHO.
Peace
Peace