Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Rumour has it that Walter Rohrl is at the 'ring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2007, 03:12 PM
  #16  
TT Surgeon
Race Director
 
TT Surgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: KC ex pat marooned in NY
Posts: 13,005
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Dave, I tried the same link, how come yours works, not mine? Am I that computer dumb?
C
Old 08-03-2007, 03:14 PM
  #17  
Coochas
Rennlist Member
 
Coochas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 01776
Posts: 9,955
Received 426 Likes on 221 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TT Surgeon
Dave, I tried the same link, how come yours works, not mine? Am I that computer dumb?
C
Chris,

It's not obvious to me what the difference is,...I just know it works!!!!!!
There are some things in this world best left undiscovered.
Old 08-03-2007, 10:52 PM
  #18  
Steve N.
Racer
 
Steve N.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

pcar964: Wrong my friend. The CGT came with PS2's. The PSC's on the GT3 are much, much grippier!
Old 08-04-2007, 03:04 PM
  #19  
gete3
Instructor
 
gete3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Remember that Porsche and WR claimed a 7.40 time for the 997 Turbo (with new Cups). The definitive Sport Auto time was 7.54 (just two seconds faster than a 996 TT on street tires).

More power and more sophisticated electronics does not always equate to faster Ring times. I hope for the best with the 997 GT2, but I doubt the Sport Auto time will be more than 5 seconds faster than the 996 GT2 (7.46 with street tires).

7.41 (with the new Cup tires) would be a good result for the 997 GT2. But the 996 GT2 with the same tires and a minor power boost would also be very close to 7.41.
Old 08-04-2007, 03:29 PM
  #20  
hammerwerfer
Racer
Thread Starter
 
hammerwerfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nürburg DE Greystones IRL
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is very hard, or should I say damned near impossible, to compare 'ring times achieved at different times. Even during the course of a day the track changes as certain bits are shaded and others in the sun. A damp patch here or there can make all the difference. To accurately compare times set days, weeks, months, or years apart is impossible.

Horst von Saurma may be a decent driver, but he is no Walter Rohrl. I am sure all the times claimed are legitimate, but the disparities in times can be due to a number of factors including of course the driver.

There is a reason the Porsche times are quicker han the Sport Auto times. One is Herr Rohrl, and the other is that they can go for a time under ideal conditions, whereas Sport Auto may be under time constraints.
Old 08-04-2007, 05:23 PM
  #21  
gete3
Instructor
 
gete3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Sport Auto times are widely recognized as the only credible comparison of Ring times with the least amount of variables. Manufacturers claims are always optimistic.
Old 08-04-2007, 07:28 PM
  #22  
iLLM3
Drifting
 
iLLM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY, LI
Posts: 2,284
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gete3
Remember that Porsche and WR claimed a 7.40 time for the 997 Turbo (with new Cups). The definitive Sport Auto time was 7.54 (just two seconds faster than a 996 TT on street tires).

More power and more sophisticated electronics does not always equate to faster Ring times. I hope for the best with the 997 GT2, but I doubt the Sport Auto time will be more than 5 seconds faster than the 996 GT2 (7.46 with street tires).

7.41 (with the new Cup tires) would be a good result for the 997 GT2. But the 996 GT2 with the same tires and a minor power boost would also be very close to 7.41.
996 GT2 on street tires did it in 7:42 already

http://www.motortrend.com/features/c...ck/index1.html

997 GT2 will not dissapoint, with proper tires and weather the car will be mindblowing there, technology suspension/engine wise with the VTG's are far greater out of the box!
Old 08-05-2007, 12:42 AM
  #23  
fayence
Instructor
 
fayence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve N.
pcar964: Wrong my friend. The CGT came with PS2's. The PSC's on the GT3 are much, much grippier!
Yes, I have both cars and tracked both, and the GT3RS with the PSC is extremely sticky as compared to the GT. It's really too bad I can't get an alternate set of tires on the GT.
Old 08-05-2007, 06:34 AM
  #24  
gete3
Instructor
 
gete3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by iLLM3
996 GT2 on street tires did it in 7:42 already

http://www.motortrend.com/features/c...ck/index1.html
The Sport Auto times are widely recognized as the only credible comparison of Ring times with the least amount of variables. Faster times may be posssible, but for true COMPARISON, only Sport Auto times are relevant.
Old 08-05-2007, 08:34 AM
  #25  
hammerwerfer
Racer
Thread Starter
 
hammerwerfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nürburg DE Greystones IRL
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gete3
The Sport Auto times are widely recognized as the only credible comparison of Ring times with the least amount of variables. Manufacturers claims are always optimistic.
I find it hard to believe that Porsche and Herr Rohrl would cheat. What have they got to gain by posting a false time? A casual observer with a stopwatch, and there can be a few about, could call their bluff.
Old 08-05-2007, 08:35 AM
  #26  
hammerwerfer
Racer
Thread Starter
 
hammerwerfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nürburg DE Greystones IRL
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fayence
Yes, I have both cars and tracked both, and the GT3RS with the PSC is extremely sticky as compared to the GT. It's really too bad I can't get an alternate set of tires on the GT.
Apparently the car is absolutely fantastic on slicks.
Old 08-05-2007, 09:29 AM
  #27  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,044
Received 1,220 Likes on 597 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gete3
The Sport Auto times are widely recognized as the only credible comparison of Ring times with the least amount of variables. Faster times may be posssible, but for true COMPARISON, only Sport Auto times are relevant.
I too wonder about this sentiment. Everyone says that for comparison SA is the only way to go b/c they use the same driver. Frankly, that only tells me how good Horst is (not saying Horst isn't a much better driver than any of us would dream of being), not the ultimate capabilities of the car. All the performance figures of the car are using driving situations which very few of us will ever encounter. I cannot recall the last time I took a clutch dropping 0-200kpn sprint, or nailed the brakes to ABS threshold from 100mph, or spun the highest lateral G's possible in a mall parking lot. If a Porsche factory driver got the TT around in 7:40 (which is believable to me) then it is a point of reference that cannot be invalidated any more than Porsche's other test figures.
Old 08-05-2007, 04:49 PM
  #28  
gete3
Instructor
 
gete3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you want to know the absolute ultimate performance of any car, you will need the best driver in the world to wring its neck. WR is very fast, but someone will be faster.

I am not so concerned about who is the fastest driver of non-race cars. Comparisons between sports cars is more interesting to me.

If you want the best comparison between cars, the Sport Auto tests have the least variables - including the same independent driver who has tested every major sports car at the Ring for many years.
Old 08-05-2007, 06:30 PM
  #29  
allegretto
Nordschleife Master
 
allegretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: in a happy place
Posts: 9,274
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Non-official word from someone who knows and will remain nameless due to "considerations";


7:31 for WR in GT-2
Old 08-05-2007, 09:24 PM
  #30  
Coochas
Rennlist Member
 
Coochas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 01776
Posts: 9,955
Received 426 Likes on 221 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by allegretto
Non-official word from someone who knows and will remain nameless due to "considerations";


7:31 for WR in GT-2
You can forget about the considerations,....OK, it was me driving.


Quick Reply: Rumour has it that Walter Rohrl is at the 'ring



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:42 PM.