Rumour has it that Walter Rohrl is at the 'ring
#17
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by TT Surgeon
Dave, I tried the same link, how come yours works, not mine? Am I that computer dumb?
C
C
It's not obvious to me what the difference is,...I just know it works!!!!!!
There are some things in this world best left undiscovered.
#19
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Remember that Porsche and WR claimed a 7.40 time for the 997 Turbo (with new Cups). The definitive Sport Auto time was 7.54 (just two seconds faster than a 996 TT on street tires).
More power and more sophisticated electronics does not always equate to faster Ring times. I hope for the best with the 997 GT2, but I doubt the Sport Auto time will be more than 5 seconds faster than the 996 GT2 (7.46 with street tires).
7.41 (with the new Cup tires) would be a good result for the 997 GT2. But the 996 GT2 with the same tires and a minor power boost would also be very close to 7.41.
More power and more sophisticated electronics does not always equate to faster Ring times. I hope for the best with the 997 GT2, but I doubt the Sport Auto time will be more than 5 seconds faster than the 996 GT2 (7.46 with street tires).
7.41 (with the new Cup tires) would be a good result for the 997 GT2. But the 996 GT2 with the same tires and a minor power boost would also be very close to 7.41.
#20
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nürburg DE Greystones IRL
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It is very hard, or should I say damned near impossible, to compare 'ring times achieved at different times. Even during the course of a day the track changes as certain bits are shaded and others in the sun. A damp patch here or there can make all the difference. To accurately compare times set days, weeks, months, or years apart is impossible.
Horst von Saurma may be a decent driver, but he is no Walter Rohrl. I am sure all the times claimed are legitimate, but the disparities in times can be due to a number of factors including of course the driver.
There is a reason the Porsche times are quicker han the Sport Auto times. One is Herr Rohrl, and the other is that they can go for a time under ideal conditions, whereas Sport Auto may be under time constraints.
Horst von Saurma may be a decent driver, but he is no Walter Rohrl. I am sure all the times claimed are legitimate, but the disparities in times can be due to a number of factors including of course the driver.
There is a reason the Porsche times are quicker han the Sport Auto times. One is Herr Rohrl, and the other is that they can go for a time under ideal conditions, whereas Sport Auto may be under time constraints.
#22
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by gete3
Remember that Porsche and WR claimed a 7.40 time for the 997 Turbo (with new Cups). The definitive Sport Auto time was 7.54 (just two seconds faster than a 996 TT on street tires).
More power and more sophisticated electronics does not always equate to faster Ring times. I hope for the best with the 997 GT2, but I doubt the Sport Auto time will be more than 5 seconds faster than the 996 GT2 (7.46 with street tires).
7.41 (with the new Cup tires) would be a good result for the 997 GT2. But the 996 GT2 with the same tires and a minor power boost would also be very close to 7.41.
More power and more sophisticated electronics does not always equate to faster Ring times. I hope for the best with the 997 GT2, but I doubt the Sport Auto time will be more than 5 seconds faster than the 996 GT2 (7.46 with street tires).
7.41 (with the new Cup tires) would be a good result for the 997 GT2. But the 996 GT2 with the same tires and a minor power boost would also be very close to 7.41.
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
http://www.motortrend.com/features/c...ck/index1.html
997 GT2 will not dissapoint, with proper tires and weather the car will be mindblowing there, technology suspension/engine wise with the VTG's are far greater out of the box!
#23
Instructor
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Steve N.
pcar964: Wrong my friend. The CGT came with PS2's. The PSC's on the GT3 are much, much grippier!
#24
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by iLLM3
996 GT2 on street tires did it in 7:42 already
http://www.motortrend.com/features/c...ck/index1.html
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
http://www.motortrend.com/features/c...ck/index1.html
#25
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nürburg DE Greystones IRL
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by gete3
The Sport Auto times are widely recognized as the only credible comparison of Ring times with the least amount of variables. Manufacturers claims are always optimistic.
#26
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nürburg DE Greystones IRL
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by fayence
Yes, I have both cars and tracked both, and the GT3RS with the PSC is extremely sticky as compared to the GT. It's really too bad I can't get an alternate set of tires on the GT.
#27
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by gete3
The Sport Auto times are widely recognized as the only credible comparison of Ring times with the least amount of variables. Faster times may be posssible, but for true COMPARISON, only Sport Auto times are relevant.
#28
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you want to know the absolute ultimate performance of any car, you will need the best driver in the world to wring its neck. WR is very fast, but someone will be faster.
I am not so concerned about who is the fastest driver of non-race cars. Comparisons between sports cars is more interesting to me.
If you want the best comparison between cars, the Sport Auto tests have the least variables - including the same independent driver who has tested every major sports car at the Ring for many years.
I am not so concerned about who is the fastest driver of non-race cars. Comparisons between sports cars is more interesting to me.
If you want the best comparison between cars, the Sport Auto tests have the least variables - including the same independent driver who has tested every major sports car at the Ring for many years.
#30
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by allegretto
Non-official word from someone who knows and will remain nameless due to "considerations";
7:31 for WR in GT-2![cherrsagai](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/drink.gif)
7:31 for WR in GT-2
![cherrsagai](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/drink.gif)