Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Any major problems 1st year GT3/RS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2007, 12:20 AM
  #1  
rop3
Pro
Thread Starter
 
rop3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Any major problems 1st year GT3/RS?

Just went the lemon route on an early production M5 in the end BMW did the right thing and bought it back. But certainly a lot of aggrivation, also the depreciation on the early cars was staggering based on ownership problems.

Just was wondering if the same would hold true with the Gt3/RS as I thing a lot of the drivetrain is first year. Don't want to get into that situation again back/forth to the dealer many times etc.

Also since it's a secondary car/limited usage, much would not show up until the warranty etc. is half way thru or expired.
Old 08-01-2007, 12:33 AM
  #2  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,050
Received 1,226 Likes on 599 Posts
Default

The RMS seal issue is about the only thing I would worry about. It is not as if the engine is any kind of fresh design, just improved over 13 years
Old 08-01-2007, 01:25 AM
  #3  
OldGuy
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
OldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southwest Idaho
Posts: 10,466
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Rop this really isnt a first year issue-if you think about it this is an evolution of the 98 Porsche LeMans GT1. And really goes back to the 964 911. The early 996 GT3s and GT2s even had 964 part numbers on the cases till Porsche started getting cases from Spain in late 04 and on. So this is kinda a 10th year issue of this drive train. The motor and tranny is a massaged version of the 996 GT3 which was a massaged version of the 993 dry sump motor which was a massaged...
So really other than the PASM suspension its not even close to a first year issuance. The RMS thing is a small problem and not anywhere as prevelant as the 996 wet sump motor. In fact my 996 GT3 had a small RMS leak that I could have let slide but then the lite bulb went off in my head for the LWFW and RS clutch upgrade which I did under warranty. The replacement seal had a 993 part number. Relax and enjoy your great car.
Old 08-01-2007, 07:23 AM
  #4  
rop3
Pro
Thread Starter
 
rop3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

You still have your 951? Just purchased my third 944 (second 951) as a doner car. My first Porsche is an S2 cab so I found a doner car on e-bay turbo S, actually in pretty good shape driveable etc. am going to swap the drivetrain from the turbo into the cab.

My track car is an 89 951 mostly stock have been thinking of new suspension. Do they still make Leda adjustables? As much as I like the new cars still like the drivetrain/weight balance of the 944's.



Originally Posted by eclou
The RMS seal issue is about the only thing I would worry about. It is not as if the engine is any kind of fresh design, just improved over 13 years
Old 08-01-2007, 07:51 AM
  #5  
lumpking
Instructor
 
lumpking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OT. Did you get any resolution onthe RS allocation?
Old 08-01-2007, 09:30 AM
  #6  
rop3
Pro
Thread Starter
 
rop3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Actually PCNA called me back verified that the dealer never lost the allocation. Dealer then claimed the owner was purchasing the car (the ever changing story).

Considering I have an actual contract for this specific car, I explained that if either the dealer or PCNA can not fulfill their commitment it could/would turn into a consumer fraud case against the dealer.

So as it stands today the owner of the dealer has requested a meeting with me tomorrow afternoon. If it's a go I have to give my hard earned cash to someone that tried to f*** me around.

Anyway, have you gotten onto yours yet?


Originally Posted by lumpking
OT. Did you get any resolution onthe RS allocation?
Old 08-01-2007, 09:54 AM
  #7  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,050
Received 1,226 Likes on 599 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rop3
You still have your 951? Just purchased my third 944 (second 951) as a doner car. My first Porsche is an S2 cab so I found a doner car on e-bay turbo S, actually in pretty good shape driveable etc. am going to swap the drivetrain from the turbo into the cab.

My track car is an 89 951 mostly stock have been thinking of new suspension. Do they still make Leda adjustables? As much as I like the new cars still like the drivetrain/weight balance of the 944's.
Leda is back in business. They went bankrupt before the summer but a new group bought them and has production going again. I would call Karl at Racer's Edge if you want a set-up. He absolutely nailed mine perfectly. Leda is so reasonably priced too!
Old 08-01-2007, 10:10 AM
  #8  
RR
Three Wheelin'
 
RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Gas gauge is incorrect on a lot of cars.
Require software change. A TSB will be out apparently in 2 weeks for this.
Old 08-01-2007, 12:53 PM
  #9  
red993tt
Racer
 
red993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TPMS is wacked
Old 08-01-2007, 03:51 PM
  #10  
Cowhorn
Rennlist Member
 
Cowhorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
The RMS seal issue is about the only thing I would worry about.
The engine in the 996 and 997 GT3 and GT3 RS is not based on the same engine in the base 996/997/986/987. It is based on the engine in the GT1 of the late 90's and as a result does not have the potential for RMS leaks/failures.
Old 08-01-2007, 04:10 PM
  #11  
pcar964
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
pcar964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Cowhorn
The engine in the 996 and 997 GT3 and GT3 RS is not based on the same engine in the base 996/997/986/987. It is based on the engine in the GT1 of the late 90's and as a result does not have the potential for RMS leaks/failures.
Old 08-01-2007, 04:49 PM
  #12  
OldGuy
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
OldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southwest Idaho
Posts: 10,466
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Cowhorn
It can leak at the RMS even though your correct on the history of the motor. The RMS
in the 996 and 997 GT3 can leak. I know My 996 GT3 leaked at the RMS. Its not anywhere near as
common as on a typical 996 911 but it still happens.
Old 08-01-2007, 05:17 PM
  #13  
RR
Three Wheelin'
 
RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

FWIW,

many cars - Mercs, BMW, Toyotas etc - experience leaks at the main seal. It is not a Porsche only problem as the posts on this board would erroneously make you think.
Old 08-01-2007, 05:44 PM
  #14  
Moogle
Race Car
 
Moogle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,451
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Luckily since the GT3/RS share so many components with the regular cars, most of the issues have been ironed out. The major difference being the engine/suspension, those parts have been proven year after year, they are nearly bulletproof.
Old 08-01-2007, 05:56 PM
  #15  
YA911Fan
Burning Brakes
 
YA911Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so they're only bullet resistant...

Originally Posted by Moogle
The major difference being the engine/suspension, those parts have been proven year after year, they are nearly bulletproof.


Quick Reply: Any major problems 1st year GT3/RS?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:18 AM.