Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997.1 vs 997.2 and the "big difference"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2016 | 11:02 PM
  #16  
snake eyes's Avatar
snake eyes
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 374
Default

Originally Posted by Bruce In Philly



Yes, that is the way it is supposed to work. Porsche created this image, IMO, because geeks like us would pass it around when this subject came up.

To the OP: DFI engine is no small change. It is a totally new block. I also know from replacing the shocks in my 2009 C2S there are suspension differences. Nobody seemed to write about them but the car configuration in the rears is different. Did Porsche do this to fit the new engine or did they improve the system? I dunno, but there are more substantive differences than just the block.

Peace
Bruce in Philly
Bruce,
they revised the entire suspension layout on the 997.2 cars.. I watched a video somewhere where they had them both on a lift and a Porsche engineer was explaining how they upgraded the control arms hubs and shock mounts.
I think it was a product overview class for Porsche dealerships service center.

In a nut shell the 997.2 has a complete powertrain and suspension package revision from the 997.1. It also has an interior and PCM upgrade.
Very big differences just on the engineering side not on the cosmetic side..

I like to think of it as part 997.1 and part 991.1
Old 03-31-2016 | 11:07 PM
  #17  
myw's Avatar
myw
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,408
Likes: 604
From: richmond hill
Default

very well + objectively said. OP i would listen to this man.

Originally Posted by snake eyes

In a nut shell the 997.2 has a complete powertrain and suspension package revision from the 997.1. It also has an interior and PCM upgrade.

Very big differences just on the engineering side not on the cosmetic side...

I like to think of it as part 997.1 and part 991.1
The following users liked this post:
Jason Gilbert (03-12-2020)
Old 04-01-2016 | 12:38 AM
  #18  
nwGTS's Avatar
nwGTS
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 351
From: Chicago, IL
Default

This reads like someone talking to you while walking away from you and then coming back and finishing their thought. You're not going to uncover some National Treasure type secret in the 997.2 that hasn't already been discussed for the past EIGHT YEARS since its been out.
Old 04-01-2016 | 03:02 AM
  #19  
ATSR's Avatar
ATSR
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 207
From: Wellington, FL
Default

Attached you will find a 30 page document that mentions in detail all the improvements found on the 997.2. As you can see, it's MUCH more than just a better nav/radio...
Attached Images
The following 4 users liked this post by ATSR:
Bobby 911 (12-15-2019), Jason Gilbert (03-12-2020), ohmyggg (10-18-2021), tojo92 (01-24-2020)
Old 04-01-2016 | 06:27 AM
  #20  
Para82's Avatar
Para82
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,191
Likes: 38
From: Bogota / Navarre Beach
Default

Originally Posted by dgjks6
Except for early 2005, the IMS is not an issue. I have not spent any time in a 997.1. Went from a 996.1 six speed to a 997.2 PDK. Both C4 cabs. And honestly can't tell a difference in speed. No track time, just driving. The place I can tell a difference is the gas pump. Much better mileage in the 997.2-if that's important to you. I drive a lot so I spend less time at the gas station.
Not really - the early 2005 model is the only model year of the 997 where the IMS can be upgraded with the ceramic one - did this on mine and now approaching 90,000 miles (driven for almost 7 years).
Old 04-01-2016 | 06:45 AM
  #21  
jglaze's Avatar
jglaze
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 334
Likes: 8
From: East Baynia
Default

Originally Posted by Para82
Not really - the early 2005 model is the only model year of the 997 where the IMS can be upgraded with the ceramic one - did this on mine and now approaching 90,000 miles (driven for almost 7 years).
Yes on 06 cars there is an IMS, but failure rates diminish to the point of not caring was the intent, I believe.
Old 04-01-2016 | 09:29 AM
  #22  
tomc_mets's Avatar
tomc_mets
Sir Thomas Lord of All Mets Fans
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,983
Likes: 114
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by ATSR
Attached you will find a 30 page document that mentions in detail all the improvements found on the 997.2. As you can see, it's MUCH more than just a better nav/radio...
Wow! I've not seen this document before...T
Old 04-01-2016 | 09:52 AM
  #23  
Dennis C's Avatar
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 1,590
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by ATSR
Attached you will find a 30 page document that mentions in detail all the improvements found on the 997.2. As you can see, it's MUCH more than just a better nav/radio...
That's a good description of the changes. It's interesting that so many people talk about how the interior of the 997.2 is vastly improved compared to the 997.1. As this press release points out, the only changes are the revamped center console/PCM and optional ventilated seats. The rest of the interior is virtually identical between the two generations of the 997.

The mechanical changes are more significant.
Old 04-01-2016 | 10:12 AM
  #24  
WV997S's Avatar
WV997S
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 348
Likes: 39
Default

Originally Posted by ATSR
Attached you will find a 30 page document that mentions in detail all the improvements found on the 997.2. As you can see, it's MUCH more than just a better nav/radio...
Nice find!
Old 04-01-2016 | 11:25 AM
  #25  
golfnutintib's Avatar
golfnutintib
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 47
From: ..............
Default

Originally Posted by goofballdeluxe
One downside to any DFI engine is carbon build up that traditional fuel injected engines don't suffer.

Many if not all DFI engines will have to have that crud cleaned out. Some need it every 15K miles, like some Audi cars I've seen. Others, it could take far longer. It's seldom talked about, and it's not cheap. With Porsche and it's usual pricing, I would expect this will be a costly expense when that times comes.
Meh...non issue if the car is driven as intended...

Originally Posted by snake eyes
There are NO cases of DFI carbon build up on gen 2 997.2 Carrera's.
The placement of the injection in the 9A1 motor prevents this...

The 9A1 is not an Audi DFI
This

Originally Posted by Quadcammer
Literally what the hell are you talking about.

It's ignore list time.
LOL...Quad off his meds again...

Originally Posted by zirrah
You listed all the major changes, and they are major. But you dismissed them. And then want to know what you are missing. Perspective I'd say. To me it sounds like you are just trying to convince yourself that your 997.1 is just as good. Not saying it's not, but the improvements made do matter to a lot of people. Especially the audio/nav system.

Much as it pains me to say, I'm with quadcammer I think lol
...hits nail on head, imho...

Originally Posted by myw
very well + objectively said. OP i would listen to this man.
Originally Posted by nwGTS
This reads like someone talking to you while walking away from you and then coming back and finishing their thought. You're not going to uncover some National Treasure type secret in the 997.2 that hasn't already been discussed for the past EIGHT YEARS since its been out.
+2


Originally Posted by ATSR
Attached you will find a 30 page document that mentions in detail all the improvements found on the 997.2. As you can see, it's MUCH more than just a better nav/radio...
Facts are so helpful... how we each react, when faced with them, that's another matter.
Old 04-01-2016 | 11:34 AM
  #26  
mike9186's Avatar
mike9186
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 712
Likes: 6
From: NYC
Default

The old cliche "Get the newest Porsche you can afford" holds true for the 997.1 vs 997.2.

If you can swing it get a 997.2. If you are like me and value bang for the buck get the 997.1 and get a thorough inspection first. My car has had its engine replaced for bore scoring (before I owned it). The engine is still under warranty until May 2016 so I drive it as much as I can to try and shake out problems but I haven't found any. I also change the oil every 3k miles and send a sample to Blackstone for analysis. I've done it twice and the first time the results were consistent for a brand new engine that was breaking in, the second time it showed near perfect results.

Pricing for 997's are over the place and I think a lot of private sellers have unrealistic expectations since there is so much inventory available. Good luck and take your time....and maybe take a test drive in that 911 you sat in before going crazy.

-Mike B

Last edited by mike9186; 06-04-2017 at 02:03 PM.
Old 04-01-2016 | 12:05 PM
  #27  
rickdogg82's Avatar
rickdogg82
Pro
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 533
Likes: 7
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default

I wonder how good the suspension refinements could be if they are not even listed (in the PDF document) as an improvement among the list of "New for 2009" features.

New for 2009
Though the 2009 911 Carrera and Carrera S Coupes boast several important
refinements over the 2008 cars, the cars carry the same internal 997 designation as
their immediate predecessors. Chief among those refinements are new, more
powerful and fuel-efficient engines and the availability of Porsche's seven-speed
double-clutch transmission, the PDK, in place of the optional Tiptronic S.
Other critical changes include larger, more potent brakes, a revised Porsche
Communication Management system with Bluetooth connectivity and available voice
commands, a fresh exterior with BI-XENON™ headlights, and light-emitting-diode rear
lighting.
Old 04-01-2016 | 12:22 PM
  #28  
snake eyes's Avatar
snake eyes
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 374
Default

Originally Posted by rickdogg82
I wonder how good the suspension refinements could be if they are not even listed (in the PDF document) as an improvement among the list of "New for 2009" features.

New for 2009
Though the 2009 911 Carrera and Carrera S Coupes boast several important
refinements over the 2008 cars, the cars carry the same internal 997 designation as
their immediate predecessors. Chief among those refinements are new, more
powerful and fuel-efficient engines and the availability of Porsche's seven-speed
double-clutch transmission, the PDK, in place of the optional Tiptronic S.
Other critical changes include larger, more potent brakes, a revised Porsche
Communication Management system with Bluetooth connectivity and available voice
commands, a fresh exterior with BI-XENON™ headlights, and light-emitting-diode rear
lighting.
pretty significant depending on what model 997 you have.
On a 997.2 C4S you get electronic AWD - same as turbo 997.1, 997.2, and the 991.1.
The viscous clutch system awd was used on the 997.1

The 997.2 Carrera 4 and 4s therefore has "significantly" different suspension and drivetrain layout than its 997.1 predessor. 997.2 4s also comes with a standard mechanical diff.
It wasn't until the 991.2 that electronic awd unit is now paired with optional rear steering and electronic rear diff.
Old 04-01-2016 | 12:31 PM
  #29  
DWNDRAFT's Avatar
DWNDRAFT
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 140
Likes: 15
Default

This is quite simple really.
Yes the .2 is overall "better" than .1, and the 991.1 is even better...just like allmost all upgrades since 1948...

I prefer the .1 look over the .2, and the price difference then made is possible to get an even better spec on .1 car over .2. Winwin for me.

Same on my 356, the C is the best car, got the BT5, as it has the look I like the most.

If you want the "best" piece of technology buy the newst car. I you want the car you like, then... Well...
Old 04-01-2016 | 01:03 PM
  #30  
slicky rick's Avatar
slicky rick
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 99
Default

Are we saying that the 997.2 had bigger brakes? So the front rotor for the 997.1 s and 997.2 s is different?


Quick Reply: 997.1 vs 997.2 and the "big difference"?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:16 AM.