Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ideal speed for best MPG on 997.1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2014, 07:28 PM
  #16  
USMC_DS1
Drifting
 
USMC_DS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,024
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

I typically get 25 mpg cruising on the hwy up to 70mph with gentle acceleration. I get better results not using cruise control and slowing down to 60-65mph(to maintain lower engine load) on the inclines. FWIW, as a comparison we rented a Merc E220 CDI wagon in Germany and got 980km(609 miles) on one tank or 70 liters(18.5 gals) of diesel fuel... or ~33 miles/gallon. That includes speeds up to 220kph(137mph) on the autobahn. I'm seriously considering a diesel car/SUV to replace my wife's Lexus SUV(v8 gas hound) which gets only 17mph at best if I drive 55-60mph.
Old 05-28-2014, 11:23 PM
  #17  
PhilD
Pro
 
PhilD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by fbfisher
I'm still wondering why I read this thread, but I am amazed at how a seemingly "funny" question has so many serious and thoughtful answers.
The same thought crosses my mind several times a day when visiting p-car forums. In fact I was going to ask why my rotors went a funny burnt orange color after I washed my car this weekend, but used the search function and found the answer 12,000 times. Who would have thought so many people had never washed a car before...
Old 05-29-2014, 06:53 AM
  #18  
sjfehr
Drifting
 
sjfehr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,029
Received 66 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

I did some experimentation with data logging after reading an article talking about how faster acceleration to 60mph is counter-intuitively more fuel efficient than slower acceleration because you get to optimal gearing quicker, and decided to put it to the test. I discovered that, no, dropping the throttle is not more fuel efficient at all; in fact it uses quite a bit more gas, but is still well worth it. Even moderate "there's a cop behind me" acceleration used more gas than pretending I was in a Prius. Then I realized the guy in the test was comparing 0-60 times of 15 to 45 seconds. WTF is up with that? 15 seconds was my slow time; I don't think I could take 45 seconds if I tried.
Old 05-29-2014, 09:33 AM
  #19  
BIG smoke
Drifting
 
BIG smoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: BIG smoke eh!
Posts: 2,798
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

I leave the neighborhood at the same time as a new Telsa. While a very sexy car for design, I could not own one. It does not make any CAR sounds. While the car may get excellent millage, I say MPG be dammed. I need gurgle, snappy acceleration and aural assault.
3.8 liters of therapy, whenever I can.
Old 05-29-2014, 01:38 PM
  #20  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by USMC_DS1
I typically get 25 mpg cruising on the hwy up to 70mph with gentle acceleration. I get better results not using cruise control and slowing down to 60-65mph(to maintain lower engine load) on the inclines. FWIW, as a comparison we rented a Merc E220 CDI wagon in Germany and got 980km(609 miles) on one tank or 70 liters(18.5 gals) of diesel fuel... or ~33 miles/gallon. That includes speeds up to 220kph(137mph) on the autobahn. I'm seriously considering a diesel car/SUV to replace my wife's Lexus SUV(v8 gas hound) which gets only 17mph at best if I drive 55-60mph.
You cannot beat diesel for highway MPG!



Quick Reply: Ideal speed for best MPG on 997.1?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:19 PM.