Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Feed back

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2013 | 02:48 PM
  #1  
speedyralph's Avatar
speedyralph
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default Feed back

This report is off a 2006 997.1. Carerra with 67k miles on the clock. Any Feed back would be great. Thank you
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (194.7 KB, 50 views)
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 03:36 PM
  #2  
speedyralph's Avatar
speedyralph
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Any feedback would be great guys, thanks
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 03:58 PM
  #3  
mattyf's Avatar
mattyf
Pro
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 664
Likes: 100
From: Pasadena
Default

The 4 and 5 over revs happened about 30k miles ago. So if the car is running fine now I wouldn't sweat it. I would try and use it to negotiate if possible.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 04:01 PM
  #4  
ZX9RCAM's Avatar
ZX9RCAM
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 10
From: Spring, Texas (The Woodlands)
Default

Originally Posted by mattyf
The 4 and 5 over revs happened about 30k miles ago. So if the car is running fine now I wouldn't sweat it. I would try and use it to negotiate if possible.
I have never seen a read out before.
How does it show it was about 30k miles ago.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 04:45 PM
  #5  
speedyralph's Avatar
speedyralph
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Thanks mattyf. Anyone else have any input on this report? Help me decide if I should go for this 997! Thanks guys
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 07:22 PM
  #6  
Wolfk's Avatar
Wolfk
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 410
Likes: 19
From: Augusta, Mo
Default

Car has 67000 miles on odometer, engine has run 2735 hrs.
67000/2735 = 24.5 mph. This is the average speed of the car during its life.
over rev occurred at 1491 hrs.
1491 X 24.5 = 36530 miles when over-rev occurred.
67000 - 36530 = 30470 miles ago when over-rev occurred, which is approx. 30k ago like Mattyf said.

I would consider an average speed of 24.5 mph indicates around town use or traffic use. Possibly with a lot of clutch wear if car has a manual trans.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 08:28 PM
  #7  
speedyralph's Avatar
speedyralph
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Thanks for your explanation on that wolfk. The car is in mint condition. Sounds great and drives smooth.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 08:32 PM
  #8  
MessyMarvin's Avatar
MessyMarvin
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 14
From: Southwick, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Wolfk
Car has 67000 miles on odometer, engine has run 2735 hrs.
67000/2735 = 24.5 mph. This is the average speed of the car during its life.
over rev occurred at 1491 hrs.
1491 X 24.5 = 36530 miles when over-rev occurred.
67000 - 36530 = 30470 miles ago when over-rev occurred, which is approx. 30k ago like Mattyf said.

I would consider an average speed of 24.5 mph indicates around town use or traffic use. Possibly with a lot of clutch wear if car has a manual trans.
What he said, to me 24.5 MPH is very low meaning it probably does not have much Highway use. Most I looked at averaged over 30MPH. I also agree the bad over-rev was so long ago it should be OK now. To me it would depend on the deal, there are so many cars out there.
Reply
Old May 15, 2013 | 10:23 AM
  #9  
Spiffyjiff's Avatar
Spiffyjiff
Three Wheelin'
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 10
From: Maryland
Default

R5 is probably a fluke (i think there are threads here/on the GT forum somewhere about how ranges with "1" are phantoms, i've even seen a printout with 1 in ranges 3, 4, and 5. this is an impossibility). and barring the possibility that the prior owner was an overzealous teen who screeched away from every stoplight, i'd say the car has definitely been tracked and looks like maybe a missed shift at 1491hrs. either way, if it drives fine, if a PPO checks out, and if the price is right, go for it.
Reply
Old May 15, 2013 | 11:22 PM
  #10  
gota911's Avatar
gota911
Newbies Hospitality Director
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 18,084
Likes: 43
From: Winston-Salem, NC
Default

The DME records the total number of ignitions (cumulative) in following rev ranges for a 997.1:

Range 1: 7300-7500 RPM
Range 2: 7500-7700 RPM
Range 3: 7700-7900 RPM
Range 4: 7900-8400 RPM
Range 5: 8400-9500 RPM
Range 6: 9500-11000 RPM

At 7200 RPM / 60 seconds per minute, you get 120 revolutions per second X 3 ignitions per revolution equals 360 ignitions per second.

The "h" (hours) are the last time (recorded in "engine hours") that revs occurred in each Range.

Based on the info you supplied, this car has spent the following time in each rev range, assuming the midpoint of each range as the actual RPM.

Range 1 - 8,073 ignitions / 370 per second = a total of 21.82 seconds in this Range
Range 2 - 2,223 ignitions / 380 per second = a total of 5.85 seconds in this Range
Range 3 - 704 ignitions / 390 per second = a total of 1.81 seconds in this Range
Range 4 - 45 ignitions / 408 per second = a total of 0.11 seconds in this Range

As others have stated earlier, since the over revs in Range 4 occurred some 30K miles ago, these numbers, in my opinion, are not bad. It does appear that the previous owner liked to bang off the rev-limiter and did so quite often, which explains the number of revs in Ranges 1 and 2.
Reply
Old May 16, 2013 | 09:19 AM
  #11  
ZX9RCAM's Avatar
ZX9RCAM
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 10
From: Spring, Texas (The Woodlands)
Default

Thanks for the explanations, all!
Reply
Old May 16, 2013 | 09:43 AM
  #12  
Spiffyjiff's Avatar
Spiffyjiff
Three Wheelin'
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 10
From: Maryland
Default

and FWIW, i've heard from a couple different (reliable) sources that it's the sudden spin up that is the root cause of damage. point being, that these engines can take higher revs. maybe not all the way to R6 but def past redline. of course, i'm no engineer, i'm just passing along what i've found out over the years.
Reply
Old May 16, 2013 | 09:57 AM
  #13  
USMC_DS1's Avatar
USMC_DS1
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,024
Likes: 65
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Spiffyjiff
R5 is probably a fluke (i think there are threads here/on the GT forum somewhere about how ranges with "1" are phantoms, i've even seen a printout with 1 in ranges 3, 4, and 5. this is an impossibility). and barring the possibility that the prior owner was an overzealous teen who screeched away from every stoplight, i'd say the car has definitely been tracked and looks like maybe a missed shift at 1491hrs. either way, if it drives fine, if a PPO checks out, and if the price is right, go for it.
+1... good that it's been so long since those hits in the upper R3-R4 range. I assume that the car is out of warranty. Otherwise Porsche could use the fits in R3 and above to push back re warranty coverage on the engine.
Reply
Old May 16, 2013 | 12:53 PM
  #14  
rsabeebe's Avatar
rsabeebe
Race Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 1,043
From: Plano/DFW
Default

it's nice to see some reasonable responses to this DME readout. i see so many posts that say avoid any car with anything in the 4, 5 and 6 range. my readout looks very similar to this one - i have some in the 4 and a '1' in the 5 range (R5 likely an anomaly). a compression test on my engine revealed almost identical numbers for all cylinders - i could get the exact numbers, if someone was curious - and the range 4 hits were many miles ago. the shop said if the car has this type of compression after this many miles from the range 4 hits, you should be fine. the 'should' was obviously a way to reduce liability if something did happen. they basically told me the engine was running great and don't worry, if you really want this car. no issues since and the car runs like a top. my car has seen some track time and autox use with previous owners and i was fine with that. i don't baby my car, so i didn't need a spotless DME report. just consider what the numbers are saying and when they happened - not all cars with something above 'R3' should be walked away from. if anything, use it as a bargaining tool. good luck.
Reply
Old May 16, 2013 | 02:00 PM
  #15  
speedyralph's Avatar
speedyralph
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Thank you all for your support and helpful responses!
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:13 PM.