Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Safety of P-cars (after viewing the remainder of burnt GT3)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2011 | 08:53 PM
  #1  
JJB236's Avatar
JJB236
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Arrow Safety of P-cars (after viewing the remainder of burnt GT3)

Have you guys seen what's left of the Jackass star's GT3? I can't tell if it was even a car.

Would a large German sedans like the Mercedes S-class or the BMW 7 series have done any better with respect to the safety of the driver and any passengers in this high speed accident? How about a massive SUV like the Cadillac Escalade or the Range Rover?

I once had a front collision with a pick-up truck in my 996 at about 20 mph, and the front of 996 has just worked its way into the pick-up truck and killed that car, while my 996 only had minor scratches on the front bumper. So P-cars appear to be solid from the front, but I wonder how our cars measure up to let's say Volvo's.
Old 07-05-2011 | 09:02 PM
  #2  
swajames's Avatar
swajames
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California
Default

Traveling at the speeds he was reported to have been traveling at, you'd have to suspect no. I would imagine almost anything would have ended up looking like the wrecked GT3. It may also have been that the emergency services had to cut open the car to retrieve the passengers. Either way, I don't think the occupants would have had much better odds if they'd been in a larger car.
Old 07-05-2011 | 09:25 PM
  #3  
LastMezger's Avatar
LastMezger
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,322
Likes: 146
From: 6th gear!
Default

A large vehicle (with higher mass) will only protect you against smaller vehicles (of presumably lesser mass).

Heavy vehicles have a disadvantage when presented with immovable objects (trees, bridge abutments, etc...) as their structure must dissipate and ultimately resist higher forces.

The 997 is an incredibly robust vehicle that offers as good or better crash protection as any German sedan...when confronted with a fixed object.

If you're in your 997, however, and you get hit by a GM Electromotive you're dead...

All that said, I'd wager the safest car in the world is the Mercedes S-Class. It's a ****in' tank with state-of-the-art systems. Can't beat that. I'd imagine a Cayenne would be a safe bet too.

The Escalade is a piece of crap.
Old 07-05-2011 | 09:44 PM
  #4  
Quadcammer's Avatar
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,716
Likes: 1,451
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by NinetyOneC2
The 997 is an incredibly robust vehicle that offers as good or better crash protection as any German sedan...when confronted with a fixed object.

All that said, I'd wager the safest car in the world is the Mercedes S-Class. It's a ****in' tank with state-of-the-art systems. Can't beat that. I'd imagine a Cayenne would be a safe bet too.

The Escalade is a piece of crap.
I'd disagree. The crumple zones in the large sedans are simply bigger, giving the structure the ability to reduce the ultimate forces absorbed by the body. The 997 is a safe car, but I know I'd rather hit a tree in a 7 series or A8 than a 911 of any kind.

I tend to agree that the S is one of the safest cars you can buy. The pure number of airbags and safety systems onboard are impressive.

The escalade has a nice sturdy full frame. They may not be to your liking, but they are a very safe car as well.
Old 07-05-2011 | 10:30 PM
  #5  
Mike in CA's Avatar
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,085
Likes: 247
From: North Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Quadcammer
I'd disagree. The crumple zones in the large sedans are simply bigger, giving the structure the ability to reduce the ultimate forces absorbed by the body. The 997 is a safe car, but I know I'd rather hit a tree in a 7 series or A8 than a 911 of any kind.
The problem though, as NinetyOneC2 correctly points out, is that the larger vehicles we're talking about, with close to a ton more mass than a 911, have significantly more energy to absorb when encountering a fixed object. This tends to negate their advantage in crumple zone size. I wouldn't bet against a 911.
Old 07-05-2011 | 11:09 PM
  #6  
gasongasoff's Avatar
gasongasoff
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 666
Likes: 41
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
The problem though, as NinetyOneC2 correctly points out, is that the larger vehicles we're talking about, with close to a ton more mass than a 911, have significantly more energy to absorb when encountering a fixed object. This tends to negate their advantage in crumple zone size. I wouldn't bet against a 911.
Specifically for a frontal collision into an immovable object/barrier, the frontal impact crash tests performed by NHTSA and IIHS would be applicable. They also post the deceleration of the impact (in "g's")...and the last time I looked, the design of the vehicle (airbag, crumple zone, dash distance from the legs/torso, etc) was more important than vehicle weight. So, I would tend to agree that vehicle weight isn't the main factor in determining safety when crashing into a tree.

On the other hand, in multiple vehicle collisions, the weight of the vehicle is VERY important, and it's been shown to correlate with driver survival when an accident does occur. The flip side of the coin is that it's harder for a heavier vehicle to avoid a collision in the first place (i.e. braking and maneuvering), so there's probably a happy middle area.

It's too bad nobody has done crash tests on Porsche's, so we'll never really know how safe the car is relative to other cars on the road.

The best website I've seen for crash safety is:
www.informedforlife.org
It synthesizes all the crash test ratings for various impacts and corrects for weight of the vehicle and frequency of each type of collision and gives you a composite score that is directly compared to other vehicles. I think it was originally compiled by an ER physician. I looked at the methodology and I am generally in agreement with it. check it out.
Old 07-06-2011 | 08:40 AM
  #7  
DHC's Avatar
DHC
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 885
Likes: 6
From: Atlanta
Default

I don't think those guys would have survived had they been in any motor vehicle. Sometimes the tree(s) win.
Old 07-06-2011 | 12:03 PM
  #8  
Edgy01's Avatar
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,720
Likes: 245
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Default

I've seen the results for several years of a 996/997 hitting and being hit. It fairs quite well in most accident scenarios because of sophisticated computer aided design and the careful placement of high strength steels. However, even the best designs cannot deal with solid objects that will not shear or fail,, themselves. As most automotive accidents are against OTHER automobiles, then they do well. When they take on a bridge structure, or a masonry building, or a large diameter tree, there is little more than can be done to improve the 997, nor any other vehicle, including a large Mercedes.
Old 07-06-2011 | 12:20 PM
  #9  
calrcm's Avatar
calrcm
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
Default

I agree with DHC. remember Princess Di? She was in a limo.
Old 07-06-2011 | 12:31 PM
  #10  
utkinpol's Avatar
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,902
Likes: 23
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by JJB236
Have you guys seen what's left of the Jackass star's GT3? I can't tell if it was even a car.
porsche has fuel rail lines on both sides of engine in rear. severe rear impact will tear them off and with fuel pump working it will ignite from exhaust.
same as on pretty much any other race cars. prepped cars have fire suppression systems with sprinklers on top of fuel rails to give you extra 5-7sec to get out. street cars, well, they are what they are. there is always volvo for those who want to feel safer.
Old 07-06-2011 | 02:58 PM
  #11  
LastMezger's Avatar
LastMezger
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,322
Likes: 146
From: 6th gear!
Default

Originally Posted by calrcm
I agree with DHC. remember Princess Di? She was in a limo.
She nor the other passengers that dies were wearing seatbelts. The lone survivor was in the front...wearing a belt. Also, in post crash images the roof had been cut off by first responders.
Old 07-06-2011 | 03:41 PM
  #12  
kosmo's Avatar
kosmo
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 10,594
Likes: 6
From: THE Republic
Default

in the GT3 crash- if the impact didnt kill them i bet the fire did.
At that speed we're all dead.
Old 07-06-2011 | 04:23 PM
  #13  
Macster's Avatar
Macster
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 255
From: Centerton, AR
Default

Originally Posted by JJB236
Have you guys seen what's left of the Jackass star's GT3? I can't tell if it was even a car.

Would a large German sedans like the Mercedes S-class or the BMW 7 series have done any better with respect to the safety of the driver and any passengers in this high speed accident? How about a massive SUV like the Cadillac Escalade or the Range Rover?

I once had a front collision with a pick-up truck in my 996 at about 20 mph, and the front of 996 has just worked its way into the pick-up truck and killed that car, while my 996 only had minor scratches on the front bumper. So P-cars appear to be solid from the front, but I wonder how our cars measure up to let's say Volvo's.
Did you say Volvo? ooh....

I lost a new 2008 Cayman S to an '89 Volvo 240D IIRC. The Volvo driver was on the phone and missed her turn and slid across/through an intersection two lanes of opposing traffic and smashed into my new Cayman S right at the left front wheel. The impact then drove the car sideways against the curb on the right side of the car. Both airbags deployed.

The car was declared a total loss.

The Volvo's damage? I swear to God (I have pics) the only damage that car showed after the accident was the headlight on the side that contacted my car hanging out by its wiring. The light still worked!

After exchanging info (and all the while me resisting the urge to beat her bloody about the head) the other driver got in her @#$% box Volvo and drove away while I stood in the rain waiting for the tow truck to remove my new car from the roadway.

But neither my passenger or I (or that damned driver of the other car) suffered any injuries.

Also, I saw a pic of a 996 that got T-boned by a Jeep something or other and while the driver suffered some injuries -- they were not that bad (broken ankle, cracked ribs) considering the force of the impact and its location. The Jeep smashed into the 996 right at the driver's dood and the jeep was moving at some speed.

All in all I feel pretty darn safe in my Porsches.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Old 07-06-2011 | 06:24 PM
  #14  
scb997's Avatar
scb997
Instructor
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 246
Likes: 17
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Safety of P-cars - My Experience

A couple of years ago, my prior 911 got T-boned by a Dodge Ram on a rainy night. I have no memory of the accident, but from what I can tell from the photos and the police report, he came across the double yellow, hit my left front corner, spun my car so the the primary impact was to the driver's side, and then went right over the top of my car. The Ram was totaled. The picture shows what happened to the 911 (an 8 month old 06 C4S).

Anyway, I credit the high strength steel and other crash protection features of the car with me being here today The wife buys that story, it was only two years later that she let me replace it with an 09 C4S
Attached Images  
Old 07-06-2011 | 07:18 PM
  #15  
Mike in CA's Avatar
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,085
Likes: 247
From: North Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by scb997
Anyway, I credit the high strength steel and other crash protection features of the car with me being here today The wife buys that story, it was only two years later that she let me replace it with an 09 C4S
That car definitely gave itself up for you and left you with "room to live", as the passenger compartment structure is amazingly intact.


Quick Reply: Safety of P-cars (after viewing the remainder of burnt GT3)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:07 AM.