Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Pilot Super Sport vs PS2s qualitative & track times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2011, 03:33 AM
  #1  
ECS
Pro
Thread Starter
 
ECS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: S. Sweden, back to West Coast in '21
Posts: 569
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default Pilot Super Sport vs PS2s qualitative & track times

Posted on the racing forum also. One data point.

997 Carrera S. It is set up with GT3 control arms, front GT3 brake cooling ducts and GT2 rear ducts. Other than that I run it stock on the track including OEM pads. I have a GT3 seat and use harnesses. Experience is about 75 track days over the last 7-8 years. Previous cars 996 GT3, 996 carrera.

I just took off my worn PS2s and put on the super sports. I had heard some good things and read some initial reviews. When I got to the shop and looked at the tires I checked the treadwear number. It was 300 vs 220 for the PS2s. I was a bit disappointed when I saw that as I had heard that the super sports were a better "track" tire. But, I decided to reserve judgement.

Qualitatively - The tread was definitely deeper than the PS2s new. The ride was quieter and they were more compliant. They did feel a bit bulkier and visually they appeared to have a higher sidewall. I prefer them as a DD tire over the PS2s.

I took them to Thunderhill. In my Carrera S I was running in the low 2:10s with my best number 2:10 with PS2s. However, with the Super sports the best I could do was mid to upper 2:11s. Granted, I was a bit rusty as I haven't tracked as much recently but I don't think I was that far off my technique. And, the temps were similar to PS2 track days. In speaking to a few track colleagues the general thought was I was paying the price for the higher treadwear rating. Seems to make sense to me. Regarding pressures, I followed the same routine of dropping the tire pressure significantly so I was running about 38psi hot rear and 33 or so in the front. My lap times were better the first 4 or so laps and I could feel the tires get greasy the latter parts of the run session. This was a similar trend for the PS2s.

My conclusion? I like the Super Sports better for DD which is what I do mostly now, but from a pure performance point of view I would pick the PS2s They felt lighter, and more agile. And the grip seemed better.

Just one data point. Of course, maybe I am just losing it!
Old 06-18-2011, 05:05 AM
  #2  
simsgw
Rennlist Member
 
simsgw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ECS
Just one data point. Of course, maybe I am just losing it!
Can you review how you prepped the new tires? Do you have a break-in procedure? Or just the DD miles between installing and getting to the track? It sounds like you planned them as track tires, but not primarily, so I don't suppose you shaved them. Would you give us an update when you've got a few thousand on them and the tread is down to 60% or so?

Gary
Old 06-18-2011, 11:02 AM
  #3  
sjfehr
Drifting
 
sjfehr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,029
Received 65 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

You can just look at the PSS and tell from the tread pattern alone it's not designed to be a no-compromises high-performance summer tire. But I don't think that's the market segment Michelin is trying to sell to. People who buy the PSS are people who won't buy a tire without an N-rating and complain about road noise on faster tires. This tire is designed for them, not us.

With tire tech advancing so rapidly and PS2 already obsolete, I really expected Michelin could pull off the other improvements without decreasing performance. I didn't expect the PSS to be slower than the PS2, though; that's a shocker. I'm looking forward to seeing the data pour in as reviewers start doing more quantitative performance testing.

Last edited by sjfehr; 06-18-2011 at 01:16 PM.
Old 06-18-2011, 12:50 PM
  #4  
E55AMG
Rennlist Member
 
E55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,374
Received 663 Likes on 336 Posts
Default

The problem with most of the tire reviews is someone will replace their current tires - that are worn down to the cords - and then proclaim how wonderful the new tire is compared to what they had. ****, anything round is gonna be better.

I was interested in the PSS and was hoping they would be much better than the PS2. Was even prepared to take off my RE-11's (that have LOTS of tread left) just to get a more fair comparison. I could be wrong but I don't think the PSS will be anywhere close to the RE-11 in perf.

I wish bridgestone could figure out a way to take some damn weight off the RE-11. It is a great street tire.
Old 06-18-2011, 09:54 PM
  #5  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,450
Received 1,036 Likes on 534 Posts
Default

I agree on the RE-11. A set of 245x19's off the front of my Cayman S still have useable tread after 16000 mi. and a couple of DEs. I'm still holding off on the PSS, might stick with the RE-11.
Old 06-19-2011, 12:04 AM
  #6  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by E55AMG
The problem with most of the tire reviews is someone will replace their current tires - that are worn down to the cords - and then proclaim how wonderful the new tire is compared to what they had. ****, anything round is gonna be better.

I was interested in the PSS and was hoping they would be much better than the PS2. Was even prepared to take off my RE-11's (that have LOTS of tread left) just to get a more fair comparison. I could be wrong but I don't think the PSS will be anywhere close to the RE-11 in perf.

I wish bridgestone could figure out a way to take some damn weight off the RE-11. It is a great street tire.
Jeez, you are concluding SO MUCH based on one review?!?! Other reviews all state PSS is faster and better than PS2.
Old 06-19-2011, 04:19 AM
  #7  
ADias
Nordschleife Master
 
ADias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southwest
Posts: 8,309
Received 395 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
Jeez, you are concluding SO MUCH based on one review?!?! Other reviews all state PSS is faster and better than PS2.
Indeed. I guess it's the exception, as this goes against all other reviews out there...
Old 06-19-2011, 11:50 AM
  #8  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 180 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sjfehr
People who buy the PSS are people who won't buy a tire without an N-rating and complain about road noise on faster tires.
Ahh correction here...Michelin Super Sport (PSS) is not a Porsche N rated tire.

I don't care that a tire is N rated or not...all my track tires are not N rated and the Toyo Proxes1's I use for the street are not N rated.
Old 06-19-2011, 12:37 PM
  #9  
E55AMG
Rennlist Member
 
E55AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,374
Received 663 Likes on 336 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
Jeez, you are concluding SO MUCH based on one review?!?! Other reviews all state PSS is faster and better than PS2.
not at all
Old 06-20-2011, 08:55 AM
  #10  
drdrank
Racer
 
drdrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 430
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ECS
Regarding pressures, I followed the same routine of dropping the tire pressure significantly so I was running about 38psi hot rear and 33 or so in the front. My lap times were better the first 4 or so laps and I could feel the tires get greasy the latter parts of the run session.
Yeah, isn't 38 pretty high to be running on the track?
Old 06-20-2011, 01:24 PM
  #11  
buckwheat987
Burning Brakes
 
buckwheat987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drdrank
Yeah, isn't 38 pretty high to be running on the track?


That was my thought also.

I run the super sports at 34/36 front/ back hot.

With my limited experience I like them better than the ps2's I previously had.
Old 06-20-2011, 01:52 PM
  #12  
drdrank
Racer
 
drdrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 430
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by buckwheat987
That was my thought also.

I run the super sports at 34/36 front/ back hot.

With my limited experience I like them better than the ps2's I previously had.
I had the P-Zeros which I liked. After about 36psi they started to get a little slippery, so I was dropping those to 34-36 hot. Ran those on a 997.1 Turbo.

Now on Cup tires, 30-32 / 32-34.
Old 06-20-2011, 02:41 PM
  #13  
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
utkinpol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,902
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by buckwheat987
That was my thought also.

I run the super sports at 34/36 front/ back hot.

With my limited experience I like them better than the ps2's I previously had.
ps2 were pretty decent tires until that moment when they cannot absorb more heat anymore and start melting and splashing rubber all around. as i understood whole point to develop super sports was to maintain same level of grip in dry and wet but not melt so easily.

still i would not probably expect them to grip as good as, say, shaved RA1 tires.
Old 06-21-2011, 12:24 AM
  #14  
10 GT3
Drifting
 
10 GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ECS
Regarding pressures, I followed the same routine of dropping the tire pressure significantly so I was running about 38psi hot rear and 33 or so in the front. My lap times were better the first 4 or so laps and I could feel the tires get greasy the latter parts of the run session. This was a similar trend for the PS2s.
Try dropping your pressures down. With 2 compounds in the tread, I would expect them to be more sensitive to pressure. Try to get 34 hot all the way around and see how they feel, 38 sounds very high even for a street tire.
Old 06-21-2011, 11:01 AM
  #15  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,765
Received 3,590 Likes on 2,336 Posts
Default

To the OP, comparing a set of tyres that have had multiple heat cycles (your PS2s) vs a set that have nowhere near the same number of cycles (MPSS) is not a fair comparison whatsoever. The SS will not be as fast as the PS2.

Also the SS is not an R rated tyre, its fully intended to be a UHP summer street tyre with a street focus but a performance profile that approaches that of the cups.

the Super Sport uses technologies that are in advance of those found in the PS2 having driven the Super Sport on track against it's competition I have no doubt that they are better.

bottom line, take em back and get PS2s if you think they are better, I think you will find a new set of PS2s will be slower than a new set of SS


Quick Reply: Pilot Super Sport vs PS2s qualitative & track times



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:44 PM.