997 and IMS issue--Scary!
#16
thanks for all of the replys. i suspect issue is overblown. however, as buckwheat confirms, there are reported problems with post 2005 cars. why else did Porsche contnue to upgrade and finally do away with IMS altogether in 2009. also, when you read LN engineering's own wrtie up about their upgrades, they themselves suggest they are not bullet proof. in re CPO's , my plan would be to own for longer than their warranties. there also will come a day that i will want to sell it and i would expect a IMS value hit then.
lastly, any chance that Porshce is covering IMS issues (ie, installing new engines) for cars out of warranty?
lastly, any chance that Porshce is covering IMS issues (ie, installing new engines) for cars out of warranty?
I've done searches on this forum and have not found one first hand report from an owner of an 06-08 997 with an IMS failure. There might be the very occassional second hand report, like Buckwheat's account of an '06 being in the shop when his car was there. Without a report being first hand from an owner, there's no way to confirm or ask questions about the car in question. Not saying it can't happen (knock on wood) on an 06-08, but I'm certainly not losing any sleep over it.
#17
Three Wheelin'
Part of the problem is that isolated, random cam chain or other issues get stamped as IMS bearing probems, when they aren't. Just becomes spook stories to scare kids before bedtime.
#19
I see these posts all the time when people start talking about IMS or unreliability.
That doesn't change the fact that if you count the number of posts complaining about IMS or other problems, it is still a perfectly accurate way of judging the reliability of a car. *Obviously* the people who have no problems aren't making posts all the time that say "yep my car is fine".
The fact is the internet gives us way better information about problems with cars than we have ever had before, thanks to the people who have problems and get out there and complain about it.
#20
Let's say there were 400 IMS problems (probably way more than there actually were). Are you going to make your buying decision based on 0.5% likelihood of you getting a problem?
My point is not that these things don't happen, my point is that it doesn't happen to 99.5% of people but you never hear from them so you think that it's a HUGE problem and one that you have to be aware of.
Statistically, there is a 1% chance of you getting your car stolen in a given year - much more than having an IMS problem. The forum doesn't reflect this - there are 10x more threads about IMS than about car theft.
#21
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I wast hinking about buying a 997. I now am not because of the IMS issue that seems to exist in all but the latest edition.. I can deal with high maintenance costs. I can't deal with catastrophic engine failure. Am I overreacting? Thanks again, Gary
The problem about Internet is that if we search enough, we can find scary stories on just about every make of cars out there, and we will scary ourselves much.
For example, when everyone thinks Toyota engines are reliable, I did have a catastrophic engine failure on my 1997 4Runner. I bought the car since new, and I had followed all the the maintenance details done by the same dealer. Still, its engine literally exploded when I was cruising on freeway, due to a faulty Connecting Rod Screw from the factory (as confirmed by the mechanics.) And my Toyota mechanic mentioned to me that he has seen similar problems on a few other 4Runner's.
Should my story scare you from buying a Toyota? No, neither should the IMF story scares you from buying a 997.
Just my two cents.
Regards,
#22
Instructor
These days I try to rely on the old adage, "Don't believe anything you hear and only half what you see."
#24
80s air cooled 911s have their own set of problems. Premature valve guide wear comes to mind as well as head studs stretching or pulling out. Exploding air boxes were also quite common, I recall as were collapsed timing chain tensioners.
#25
Burning Brakes
If you are a male over the age of 40 you likely have a higher risk of dropping dead from a coronary event than having an IMS failure on a 2006+ 997. No joke!
#26
No one except PORSCHE knows what percentage of cars has had IMS problems. No one. Anything you hear or read is pure speculation.
All that is known is that after mid 2005 a reinforced IMS was used in the M96 engine.
As with any high end purchase you need to weight the costs of warranties vs the risk and your comfort level.
Last edited by buckwheat987; 09-11-2010 at 08:11 PM.
#27
It is funny how people make up idiotic "statistics" from the top of their head just to reinforce their kakamenie opinions.
The fact I KNOW is that my indy services ca.400 water cooled Porsches and saw over 20 engine failures. Maybe he is a Jonah, i dont know about that..
#28
The point I'm trying to make, which is clearly lost on many, is that if there is nothing wrong with your car that statistic is not collected. Your Porsche guy saw 400 cars - why were they there? Because there was something wrong with them! He didn't see all the ones that had no problems...
It's like going to a hospital to collect injury statistics and ignoring all the people who are pefectly fine. Forums are the hospitals of the internet - a place where people go to get advice when something goes wrong - not when there are no problems.
#29
Kuhan, I am not trying to be nasty to you, I really don't but still I am compelled to answer.
1 - Your logic is flawed; there are average Porsche owners whose cars are SERVICED by my indy (see my post) and not COMING WITH A SERIOUS FAULT ONLY owners... except maybe such a hard core DIY guys who even change and balance their own tires.
2 - I do agree with your main point being that our cars are basically sound. What bothers me really, and I hope it is obvious in my post above, is when people make up silly and absolutely false "statistics" to "prove" how valid their opinions are.
Lets leave it to politicians, lobbyists, pressure groups and other idiots meddling with our lives badly enough as it is.
These parasites and their family members constitute 37.89% of the population already..
1 - Your logic is flawed; there are average Porsche owners whose cars are SERVICED by my indy (see my post) and not COMING WITH A SERIOUS FAULT ONLY owners... except maybe such a hard core DIY guys who even change and balance their own tires.
2 - I do agree with your main point being that our cars are basically sound. What bothers me really, and I hope it is obvious in my post above, is when people make up silly and absolutely false "statistics" to "prove" how valid their opinions are.
Lets leave it to politicians, lobbyists, pressure groups and other idiots meddling with our lives badly enough as it is.
These parasites and their family members constitute 37.89% of the population already..
#30
Anyone know if anything can be done to reduce the risk of this happening?
Like maybe letting the car warm up before driving it etc.
It happened to a friend who was using one as an everyday driver, luckily he was still under warranty, but now I am out and this is scary!
THis would be like 30k, right?!
Like maybe letting the car warm up before driving it etc.
It happened to a friend who was using one as an everyday driver, luckily he was still under warranty, but now I am out and this is scary!
THis would be like 30k, right?!