Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Porsche has my 911 and won't give it back!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2010, 08:47 PM
  #16  
lvandermerwe
Advanced
 
lvandermerwe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RollingArt
Are you Art VanDelay of VanDelay Industries?

Latex, right?

Not that there's anything wrong with that!




Phil
Designed the new addition to the Gugenheim?
Old 08-16-2010, 08:53 PM
  #17  
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Edgy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 17,699
Received 235 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

So what you seem to be saying is that you bought the car used, and that the dealership in which you bought the car has provided an extended warranty on the car--right?

You need to document very thoroughly the number of times that the car has gone in for service against the calendar. There are specific criteria for a car to qualify under any sort of lemon law. Your individual state makes all the difference, so we can't really tell you much without that info.

It's good that you have you regional representative from PCNA involved--that means it is understood by them that there are issues.

I assume that they are giving you a Cayenne loaner?

Keep documenting, and keep calling. The squeaky wheel gets the grease.
Old 08-16-2010, 08:57 PM
  #18  
BoxsterG
Rennlist Member
 
BoxsterG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 511
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You mentioned that the car spent the last 3-4 months in service. You have had the car returned to you and then had to go back to the dealer for issues each time. In addition the car spent 5 straight weeks in service and I am sure that has been frustrating. However, I would not be so quick to call the attorney. I would contact the general manager at the dealership and work your way up the chain with PCNA to resolve this issue. If Porsche accepts this as their issue they are more than likely to compensate you appropriately. In fact you stated that they have already compensated you previously, so they appear to acknowledge the issue at this time. Sometimes, people leave companies and the replacement person isn't aware of your issue at the time they take over.
Take a deep breathe and work it out through the chain of command first. Dont worry the US Justice system isnt going anywhere soon.
Old 08-16-2010, 09:16 PM
  #19  
Canyon56
Burning Brakes
 
Canyon56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SinisterSC
I'm not sure how easy it will be to Lemon Law a 5 year old car, but good luck

http://www.ag.ca.gov/consumers/general/lemon.php

"Coverage For Vehicles That Are Not "New"

Although the special provisions discussed above apply to new motor vehicles, Song-Beverly has many general rules that apply to any consumer product sold with an express written warranty. As a result, there is important coverage for motorcycles, the living quarters of a mobile home, used vehicles sold with a dealer's express written warranty, "lemon" vehicles repurchased by the manufacturer and sold to consumers with an express written warranty covering the defect, and vehicles sold with a service contract.

A full description of warranty rights is beyond the scope of this message, but you should be aware that coverage is not identical to the coverage for new motor vehicles. For example, a warrantor who is unable to conform a consumer product to its express warranty within a reasonable number of attempts is required to replace the goods or refund the purchase price less an amount attributable to the consumer's use. Unlike the special rules on new motor vehicles, however, there is no set formula for determining the charge for the consumer's use before the discovery of the defect, and the Lemon Law presumption does not apply.

For complete advice concerning your legal rights, you should consult your own attorney."
fwiw, the OP said it was a used vehicle on an extended Porsche warranty. Under the CA lemon law (which the poster cited above), used cars under warranty are eligible. The difference is that the refund or replacement value is determined differently than if it were a new car.
Anyway, the OP doesn't say where he is geographically, so it's all moot I suppose.

"The Warranty Act also applies to used vehicles that are still under a manufacturer's new car warranty. When a used car covered by a new car warranty is sold, any remaining time left in the warranty protects the car's new owner. The law covers "certified" used cars (autos with quality guarantees sold by dealers or through manufacturers' programs), resold lemons (defective vehicles that are bought back by manufacturers or dealers and then resold) and autos covered by extended service contracts.

By California law, the first time a lemon buyback is resold at the retail level, it must have one-year factory warranty to cover defects and cannot legally be sold "as is." The law requires that the car's title state that it is a "lemon law buyback" and the car must have a "lemon" sticker on the door jamb. When lemon buybacks are illegally sold "as is," the buyer still has rights under the Lemon Law."
Old 08-16-2010, 09:38 PM
  #20  
drum19go
AutoX
 
drum19go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You've been very patient, what you can do is two things:
1. Get an auto assessor to come out and write up a present value of the car in its current state, then compare that to the same car with no issues, and the related value of that car. This will give you the replacement value without the issues of the same vehicle.
2. Have your attorney send the GM of the dealership a letter that includes documentation on every issue to-date (you can get this list from the dealer, I'm sure), and ask for full replacement value of the car from the dealer via your attorney. They are always interested in getting another car off the lot, so they may just go out and find a comparable vehicle and do a straight-up swap (you'd need to redo the financing, but the cost would essentially be the same to you). If they balk at the total value (as you've driven the car, added miles, and reduced some of the value) you may need to take the lower 'replacement value' of the car either in a payoff or trade, in which case you'd need to pay the difference to do a payoff.

Either way, you need to decide what you want to do: if it's to get rid of the car (with a car with this many problems, life will not get easier over time), you'll need to cut a deal with the dealer. Have your attorney contact the dealer and try to work things out or, if you are comfortable doing this yourself, know it'll be a rough and time consuming process (lawyers are trained to do it). If you want the car back, you want concessions/agreement as to how they'll treat the car when they have it, and what they'll give you for every day in the shop. You're paying for the car, have them cover your payments during any repair periods, plus provide a loaner. This should encourage them to either find resolution or get you a different car quickly.

FYI I have a friend that did the 'trade up' with a BMW he had that just didn't work (its stopped starting, and had to be towed multiple times from his home garage). They eventually, after enough complaining and threats to sue, gave him a replacement car of like kind.

Best of luck!
Old 08-16-2010, 10:19 PM
  #21  
limbo
Rennlist Member
 
limbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 53
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Canyon56
"The Warranty Act also applies to used vehicles that are still under a manufacturer's new car warranty. When a used car covered by a new car warranty is sold, any remaining time left in the warranty protects the car's new owner. The law covers "certified" used cars (autos with quality guarantees sold by dealers or through manufacturers' programs), resold lemons (defective vehicles that are bought back by manufacturers or dealers and then resold) and autos covered by extended service contracts.
That's really interesting and must be a change to the law in the last several years.

I had a pile of problems on a CPO Acura ~11yrs ago. When I had an attorney explore my options Lemon Law was not an option as the car was not 'new.' I called American Honda so many times that I can still recite the VIN from memory...

MB
Old 08-16-2010, 10:49 PM
  #22  
Canyon56
Burning Brakes
 
Canyon56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by limbo
That's really interesting and must be a change to the law in the last several years.

I had a pile of problems on a CPO Acura ~11yrs ago. When I had an attorney explore my options Lemon Law was not an option as the car was not 'new.' I called American Honda so many times that I can still recite the VIN from memory...

MB
The piece I quoted above is from the 2001 statutes. There was also a new law establishing the California Car Buyer's Bill of Rights covering both new and used vehicles and was effective July 1, 2006.

fyi, here are the laws and contact info for all states:http://autopedia.com/html/HotLinks_Lemon.html
Old 08-17-2010, 12:15 AM
  #23  
asu_lee
Advanced
 
asu_lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would keep the lawyers out as long as possible. Use them as the very very last straw. Things get mean when they get involved.
Old 08-17-2010, 12:50 AM
  #24  
winkingchef
Pro
 
winkingchef's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Buy them a used DVD of "Dude, Where's My Car?"
This movie got Ashton Kutcher laid, so anything's possible.
Old 08-17-2010, 05:07 AM
  #25  
limbo
Rennlist Member
 
limbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 53
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Canyon56
The piece I quoted above is from the 2001 statutes. There was also a new law establishing the California Car Buyer's Bill of Rights covering both new and used vehicles and was effective July 1, 2006.

fyi, here are the laws and contact info for all states:http://autopedia.com/html/HotLinks_Lemon.html
That would explain it; I bought that car in '98 and went through most of the grief in '99.

MB
Old 08-17-2010, 09:53 AM
  #26  
mattmotos
Intermediate
 
mattmotos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dealt with the same exact issue... they finally changed the flywheel saying that it was causing engine vibrations tripping the light. CEL hasn't come on since! 2005 Carrera... I know you didn't want diagnosis, but this resolution seemed odd to me.
Old 09-08-2010, 11:59 PM
  #27  
artvandelay
5th Gear
Thread Starter
 
artvandelay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thought I owed you all an update given the helpful advice. So I got my car back after the dealership had it for 5 weeks...and it still didn't feel right. I told them immediately that I didn't think it was fixed and that I was sure the check engine light would come back on. A week and a half later the check engine light came back on and it was back at the dealer. Guess they finally realized there was nothing else left to replace and the car is now getting a replacement engine (finally!).

I didn't ever end up getting a lawyer - us Canadians aren't particularly litigious. Question for those who have had engine replacements under warranty...what warranty on the engine were you offered? Dealership is telling me that replacement engine is only covered up to end of my extended warranty, which is about 6 months away. They said 2-year warranty on engine only applies when customer pays for the engine.

Also interesting to have read some of the previous stories about engine replacement on 2005 cars...seems like pretty cut and dried situations. Mine was a bit different where the car continued to drive, albeit underpowered, and the diagnosis was never clear (at least to this dealership).
Old 09-09-2010, 12:33 AM
  #28  
gota911
Newbies Hospitality Director
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
gota911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 18,084
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

That is correct. If Porsche pays then the part is covered for the remainder of the current warranty period. If Owner pays it is covered for 2 years from install date.
Old 09-09-2010, 12:48 AM
  #29  
9972RS
Burning Brakes
 
9972RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: VA/NJ
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

what? no lemon laws up there? could you have asked for a new car?
Old 09-09-2010, 10:00 AM
  #30  
Eric - Plug Guy
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Eric - Plug Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,993
Received 194 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

Not true. If Porsche or anyone else pays for it, the engine is to be covered for two years....true on any part from Porsche. Canadian law may apply, but I had a replacement engine on my '04 C4S years back, car was just out of factory warranty, and Porsche covered the entire nut, and covered the engine for two years as well.

Demand coverage for 2 years, or you could be screwed in 7 months.
__________________
Eric
Chief Plug Guy
BumperPlugs.com

2022 GT3 Touring
2009 997 Turbo Cab
2018 M2 6sp


Gone but not forgotten
2004 C4S Cabriolet
1999 C2 Cab





Quick Reply: Porsche has my 911 and won't give it back!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:28 PM.