Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Need Advice on FUN Daily Driver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2010, 05:35 PM
  #31  
mickfluff
Drifting
 
mickfluff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,886
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default True but....

or for the person that can only own one car they deliver in every department....just none on one extreme. That said, I do know what your saying.



Originally Posted by alexb76
I actually don't like any of these new sport utility cars... they are compromise in all departments!
Old 03-24-2010, 05:38 PM
  #32  
LagunaDallas
Rennlist Member
 
LagunaDallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dallas & Laguna Beach
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is a familiar dilemma. I considered others before getting the 997.2, and I think the Audi S5 (coupe or convertible) is incredibly attractive and relatively inexpensive considering your budget. It is becoming a bit common, though gorgeous. If you go the sedan route, my vote is for the 7-Series. I've ordered a 740i M Sport --- 0-60 in 5.8 seconds, 25 mpg on the highway, big and safe, looks great with the 20" M Sport wheels and body kit, and $10K+ less than a comparably-equipped 750i. I drove the Panamera and was very impressed with the interior and driving experience, though I'd never spend $100K to put ugly in my garage.
Old 03-24-2010, 05:49 PM
  #33  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ADias
It's not subjective. It is an adaptive process. You just learn the new interface. When I first drove the Panamera I reacted to the different rearview interface, but once I understood the tools and adjusted them I had no problem. Besides... I do not drive looking rearward most of the time.
OFCOURSE IT IS! Adoption to new tools, interface is very subjective! Some people never gets used to something new while others adopt a lot faster.

The rearview mirror is small as far as the OP is concerned and that's an issue for him and you cannot discount his opinion based on yours! That's how it's subjective, you can compromise the lack of rear vision with other perceived benefits of Panamera, the OP can't!
Old 03-24-2010, 05:53 PM
  #34  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mickfluff
or for the person that can only own one car they deliver in every department....just none on one extreme. That said, I do know what your saying.
They are not SUV, but pretend to be.
They are not a sports car, but pretend to be.
They are not a luxury sedan, but pretend to be.

Basically to make every criteria, they have to compromise. Its not as comfortable as a 4-dr, not as sporty as M5, not as capable offroad as a Cayenne.

If you watched the Top Gear review of X6 in Season 14, you understand what I mean. These cars have an identity crisis, wanna do everything, while can't do any of it very well.
Old 03-24-2010, 06:08 PM
  #35  
mickfluff
Drifting
 
mickfluff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,886
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default not sure I agree....

Have watched many a top gear and it is to bad 75% of the episodes are them racing RV's and turning cars into house boats...and less real car reviews.... they also choked all over the new 997 when it came out. Don't get me wrong I like the show but seen many shows that are laughable in their judging criteria...

To your point... I see things a bit different. They never claim to be the ultimate sports car, nor have the most interior space, nor be the best off roading AWD vehicle, nor the most luxury... they do a little of each which in its own right is cool.....not many cars out there can do that.

My first reaction is that it does have more room then the M5 and offers awd so rides better in tough conditions (snow etc).. so beats it here.... and handles better + faster then the GTS so does beat the GTS in certain areas....but before I make this claim I would need to do some more research....

Not buying one anytime soon just appreciate them for what they are... see your point about an identity crises so point well taken.

Moving on....

Originally Posted by alexb76
They are not SUV, but pretend to be.
They are not a sports car, but pretend to be.
They are not a luxury sedan, but pretend to be.

Basically to make every criteria, they have to compromise. Its not as comfortable as a 4-dr, not as sporty as M5, not as capable offroad as a Cayenne.

If you watched the Top Gear review of X6 in Season 14, you understand what I mean. These cars have an identity crisis, wanna do everything, while can't do any of it very well.
Old 03-24-2010, 06:16 PM
  #36  
vexed
Racer
 
vexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 382
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

We all enjoy spending other people's money

I went from sedan to Pcar even with the kids. But it's tight so I can see why you want something with 4 doors.

I know (from various forums) someone who writes for Autoblog, he would tell you a Panamera S. He just drove the AM Rapide and still prefers the Panamera. My wife and I drove a new E class (not the E63) when she was car shopping, it was a bit funky.

As others have said the hunt is sometimes more fun.
Old 03-24-2010, 06:33 PM
  #37  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mickfluff
Have watched many a top gear and it is to bad 75% of the episodes are them racing RV's and turning cars into house boats...and less real car reviews.... they also choked all over the new 997 when it came out. Don't get me wrong I like the show but seen many shows that are laughable in their judging criteria...

To your point... I see things a bit different. They never claim to be the ultimate sports car, nor have the most interior space, nor be the best off roading AWD vehicle, nor the most luxury... they do a little of each which in its own right is cool.....not many cars out there can do that.

My first reaction is that it does have more room then the M5 and offers awd so rides better in tough conditions (snow etc).. so beats it here.... and handles better + faster then the GTS so does beat the GTS in certain areas....but before I make this claim I would need to do some more research....

Not buying one anytime soon just appreciate them for what they are... see your point about an identity crises so point well taken.

Moving on....
Funny review here... kinda sums it up though

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYm_fxjyAYs
Old 03-24-2010, 06:33 PM
  #38  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

If you must have a sedan or coupe, or simply don't want another SUV, this is obviously not the answer, but the new Cayenne S, due in showrooms by fall looks pretty good to me. New sportier exterior styling, over 400lbs lighter than previous model, new 8 speed gearbox, more power from the V8, updated Panamera style interior, more fuel efficient. Could be a luxurious family hauler that's also fun to drive. I'd certainly rather have one of these over an X6, and probably will when it's time (soon) to replace my '06 Audi S4 Avant.
Old 03-24-2010, 07:03 PM
  #39  
Macster
Race Director
 
Macster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Centerton, AR
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 0
Received 252 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
OTOH, the March issue of Car and Driver did a comparison test of the BMW 750i, the Maserati Q and the Panamera S and the Porsche came out on top. Guess it depends on who you want to believe......
Well, since I gave up reading Car & Driver and Road & Track and Motor Trend over a year ago I believe the UK published car mags mostly. They seem to be a bit more honest and not afraid to speak their mind regarding various cars.

IIRC on the whole the Panamera has received mostly if not completely lack-luster reviews by the UK car mag crowd. However, other Porsche models fare quite well.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Old 03-24-2010, 07:06 PM
  #40  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macster
Well, since I gave up reading Car & Driver and Road & Track and Motor Trend over a year ago I believe the UK published car mags mostly. They seem to be a bit more honest and not afraid to speak their mind regarding various cars.

IIRC on the whole the Panamera has received mostly if not completely lack-luster reviews by the UK car mag crowd. However, other Porsche models fare quite well.

Sincerely,

Macster.
I agree.

Unfortunately, C&D and Motortrend have become darlings of particular car companies and I don't think have been as objective or honest in their review of the last few years.
Old 03-24-2010, 07:19 PM
  #41  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macster
Well, since I gave up reading Car & Driver and Road & Track and Motor Trend over a year ago I believe the UK published car mags mostly. They seem to be a bit more honest and not afraid to speak their mind regarding various cars.

IIRC on the whole the Panamera has received mostly if not completely lack-luster reviews by the UK car mag crowd. However, other Porsche models fare quite well.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Originally Posted by alexb76
I agree.

Unfortunately, C&D and Motortrend have become darlings of particular car companies and I don't think have been as objective or honest in their review of the last few years.
I'm not a particular fan of C&D either; I have a subscription only because it's dirt cheap and much prefer other sources and mags like R&T. Although C&D's subjective opinions are suspect, I don't think they've sunk to faking test numbers yet, and those numbers favor the Panamera. Make of it what you will.
Old 03-24-2010, 07:42 PM
  #42  
ADias
Nordschleife Master
 
ADias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southwest
Posts: 8,309
Received 396 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
OFCOURSE IT IS! Adoption to new tools, interface is very subjective! Some people never gets used to something new while others adopt a lot faster.

The rearview mirror is small as far as the OP is concerned and that's an issue for him and you cannot discount his opinion based on yours! That's how it's subjective, you can compromise the lack of rear vision with other perceived benefits of Panamera, the OP can't!
If you say so. Subjective conclusions can often yield optimistic acceptance once the rational mind takes over.

What do you know about the OP? The OP may think about it take another look and who knows? Subjective right ?!?
Old 03-25-2010, 12:33 AM
  #43  
swajames
Racer
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mickfluff
they also choked all over the new 997 when it came out. Don't get me wrong I like the show but seen many shows that are laughable in their judging criteria...
Clarkson did their first review of the 997 - and he loved it. There is a myth that he doesn't like Porsche - he simply baits Hammond who is a Porsche guy through and through.

If you watch their 997 review all the way through the conclusion was that it was "spectacular". The 997 also recorded its lap in the (very) wet - and recorded the same time as the E60 M5 in the dry.
Old 03-25-2010, 11:21 AM
  #44  
mickfluff
Drifting
 
mickfluff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,886
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default Not this one......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYWk-nat1ok

this is not a great review of the base 997.... makes the S sound like its s turbo though in comparison to none S...anyone that sees this will think the S 1000% better then the none S, which we all know it not the case.

Did they really record its car performance in comparison to all the others on their list with buckets of rain on the ground???????????

Back on track...... OP whats leading the pack as interesting options????????????????

Originally Posted by swajames
Clarkson did their first review of the 997 - and he loved it. There is a myth that he doesn't like Porsche - he simply baits Hammond who is a Porsche guy through and through.

If you watch their 997 review all the way through the conclusion was that it was "spectacular". The 997 also recorded its lap in the (very) wet - and recorded the same time as the E60 M5 in the dry.

Last edited by mickfluff; 03-25-2010 at 12:26 PM.
Old 03-25-2010, 12:50 PM
  #45  
Hockeyman11385
Instructor
 
Hockeyman11385's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We have an RS4 and absolutely love it. Unfortunately you can't buy one new any more so I don't think this works for the OP since he needs to lease.

I would take a hard look at the MB AMG's. They are ridiculously fast and the latest E63 is supposed to be great through the corners. They also changed the styling more with the latest E63 versus the "regular" E classes than they did with the previous model. They have a lot of presence when seen in person.

I am also a big fan of the S5 and hopefully you can still find one with the V8 instead of the new supercharged 6. The 6 may be a great motor but it can't match the character of the 8. As far as I know, the 8 is only available in the coupes and the 6 is in the convertibles. This may have changed for this model year.

Overall you can't go too far wrong with any of the choices. Go for a lot of test drives and see if one jumps out at you.


Quick Reply: Need Advice on FUN Daily Driver



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:20 PM.