Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

DFI engines oil consumption

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2010, 07:05 PM
  #16  
Fahrer
Three Wheelin'
 
Fahrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

What about the different cylinder surface?
Old 03-24-2010, 07:22 PM
  #17  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ADias
I do not buy your argument. I would bet that the oil consumption statistics of port injection and DFI in PAG's boxer engines are probably similar.
I am also not following the logic. More carbon deposit with DFI makes sense, but more oil consumption? not sure...

Maybe this thread is in response to the thread about the guy who traded his Porsche for Vette due to excessive oil consumption. His case was definitely an exception.
Old 03-25-2010, 06:38 AM
  #18  
ross74
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
ross74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: athens
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is not the injection method that brings along the oil consumption guys, it is the high compression and higher operating temperatures.
However I rest my case, I am not trying to convince anybody just trying to give some peace of mind to those new DFI owners that are watching their cars eat oil like crazy by saying: this will normalise with time as you put some mileage to these new engines...
It saddens me somewhat to see users that are new to P cars (like the Vette guy on the other post) being so negative about their cars
Old 03-25-2010, 07:03 AM
  #19  
simsgw
Rennlist Member
 
simsgw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ross74
It saddens me somewhat to see users that are new to P cars (like the Vette guy on the other post) being so negative about their cars
Me too, Ross. And that's probably the best way to tie up this thread: be patient with your cars and learn to love them.

On one end of life we have natural born bus riders. Though they sometimes own cars, they really prefer never to worry about anything concerning their vehicle but the crick in their neck from leaning forward staring down the street to see if it's coming. Well, that and how to get other people's gum out of their clothes.

On this end of life, we have... Porsche owners. I like it here.

Even if I do refuse to change my own oil.

Gary
Old 03-25-2010, 04:37 PM
  #20  
ross74
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
ross74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: athens
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well said Gary!
Old 03-25-2010, 08:34 PM
  #21  
DRJMK
Burning Brakes
 
DRJMK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 815
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

got my oil changed today at the local indy. The mechanic said the soot issue is due to the 'rich' mixture and he runs his Turbo 'rich', producing alot of soot. Now, for the oil consumption, he has no idea. I've mentioned before that I have gone through about 4 quarts in 7500 miles and now, we are going to monitor it until 10k. I'll keep you all posted!
Old 03-26-2010, 07:33 AM
  #22  
Wills
Advanced
 
Wills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When are people topping up their oil? When the gauge is on the bottom marker or when its at the mid point with 2 blocks showing?

I ask this as I have used 1 litre (is that one quart in your money?) over 14,000 miles but most of that consumption happens very quickly i.e it goes from full (4 bars) down to 2 bars within a week or two, the gauge also will show full one day and 1/2 full the next and vice versa (I know its not 1/2 full as the gauge covers one litre but you get my point)

So you could be over filling if you are topping up all the time and the engine will or is designed to burn off the excess? I tend to look at my Oil pressure gauge as well as the oil level gauge...
Old 03-26-2010, 08:30 AM
  #23  
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,657
Received 1,389 Likes on 806 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by simsgw
Me too, Ross. And that's probably the best way to tie up this thread: be patient with your cars and learn to love them.

On one end of life we have natural born bus riders. Though they sometimes own cars, they really prefer never to worry about anything concerning their vehicle but the crick in their neck from leaning forward staring down the street to see if it's coming. Well, that and how to get other people's gum out of their clothes.

On this end of life, we have... Porsche owners. I like it here.

Even if I do refuse to change my own oil.

Gary
Disagree. Learning to love burning 1.6 quarts per 625 miles is absolutely unacceptable and if people just say, oh well its just a quirk, porsche will never be pushed into fixing it. I don't care if its a new ferrari, a bentley, a lambo, whatever, that oil consumption is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS.

Loving a Porsche is one thing, but completely overlooking engineering flaws or poor production tolerances is just a way for Porsche to continue to be half assing stuff.
Old 03-26-2010, 10:13 AM
  #24  
300cd300sdl911
Advanced
 
300cd300sdl911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Killingworth Ct
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default oil consumption

I'll throw this into the mix.........
I had to bring my 997.1 to the dealer to have a new key programmed yesterday. While there, I mentioned I'd been reading alot of comments / complaints relative to high oil consumption on the 997.2's. He of course indicated that he didn't hear many complaints......then went on to say it would most likely be related to the method of 'break in' on the cars when new. He said if the cars were babied during break in that might promote higher oil useage. He thought cars that were driven hard during break in would relect lower oil consumption. Perhaps this explains why some cars don't seem to exhibit this issue while others do (I do also agree with the variation associated with manufacturing tolerances on some engines as I have been involved in mfg. and process process capability for many years)
Just wanted to pass this along. Maybe a survey of break in method / style would provide additional clues.
Old 03-26-2010, 11:00 AM
  #25  
jakes dad
Racer
 
jakes dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: avon lake ohio
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Is "using oil" and "burning oil" the same thing????
Are the engines blowing the oil past the rings or burning the oil in the cylinders????
I've got the black spots all over the garage floor and against the garage door...
Old 03-26-2010, 11:40 AM
  #26  
Wills
Advanced
 
Wills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 300cd300sdl911
.then went on to say it would most likely be related to the method of 'break in' on the cars when new. He said if the cars were babied during break in that might promote higher oil useage. He thought cars that were driven hard during break in would relect lower oil consumption.
Not sure why that should matter, but I didn't break my car in as there is no official running in period in the UK and I don't use much oil so maybe he's correct in his assumption.

If my car was using a litre of of oil every 600 miles I would be unhappy (but I've never had a car in 25 years that has used more than a litre between services)
Old 03-26-2010, 12:08 PM
  #27  
Fahrer
Three Wheelin'
 
Fahrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jakes dad
Is "using oil" and "burning oil" the same thing????
Are the engines blowing the oil past the rings or burning the oil in the cylinders????
I've got the black spots all over the garage floor and against the garage door...
It is normal for engines to use some oil. Using or burnig oil are basically the same thing.... the oil is basically making it's way into the exhaust system. This generally happens from more-than-usual amounts of oil are getting past the rings into the combustion chamber from the crankcase or from the head through the valve seals into the cylinder ports. In addition, excess pressure in the crankcase can cause more oil vapor to be routed into the intake area via the crankcase ventilation system. This excess pressure could be caused by blowby. Direct injection has nothing to do with this. DI does allow the designer to use a higher compression ratio without pre-ignition due to the cooling effects of DI. Oil leaks are another issue but significant usage from this would mean puddles of oil in your garage.

What folks are not discussing in this thread is the fact that Porsche went to a different ( lower cost) cylinder surface treament process for the 2009/10 engines ( this has nothing to do with the fact that they have DI !). The different surface treatment is far more likely to affect the oil consumption rate.
Old 03-26-2010, 12:24 PM
  #28  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fahrer
What folks are not discussing in this thread is the fact that Porsche went to a different ( lower cost) cylinder surface treament process for the 2009/10 engines ( this has nothing to do with the fact that they have DI !). The different surface treatment is far more likely to affect the oil consumption rate.
So, what you're saying is that the higher consumption of oil in the DFI engines are mostly due to Cylinder surface treatment vs. DFI (as Ross is arguing)?
Old 03-26-2010, 12:37 PM
  #29  
Macster
Race Director
 
Macster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Centerton, AR
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 0
Received 252 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
So, what you're saying is that the higher consumption of oil in the DFI engines are mostly due to Cylinder surface treatment vs. DFI (as Ross is arguing)?
I've never been inside a DFI engine but the cylinder surface treatment is not the source of high oil consumption.

The likeliest source is the very low tension rings used to reduce internal engine friction.

Other car makers that have gone this route have found -- or the car owners have found -- high oil consumption to be a problem.

Back in late 01 when I was looking at Corvettes the word was the engine was an oil burner. Some were so bad the owners managed to get the dealer/factory to re-ring the engines under warranty. Chevy released something to the effect the engines had low tension rings to reduce engine friction and high oil consumption was a possible side effect. Also, Chevy went on to say that how the car was driven also played a role.

Some owners were driving the Corvette like a small motorcycle taking revs up to redline then closed throttle coasting down and buzzing around town in low gears with engine way up its rpm band.

When Chevy pointed out this was sure to raise oil consumption some owners pointed out that Chevy sold the car as a sports car and they were using the car that way.

As I mentioned more than one owner got his engine re-ringed and some got new pistons and rings and few even got new engines.

While I don't believe that most Porsche owners of cars with DFI engines are treating their cars like the Corvette owners did that I mentioned above, the DFI engines do have low tension rings. And they'll use oil because of it, until the engine gets some miles on it. There will be a few that continue to use oil I'm sure there always are high oil consuming engines, even with high tension rings.

Sincerely,

Macster.
Old 03-26-2010, 12:50 PM
  #30  
Fahrer
Three Wheelin'
 
Fahrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
So, what you're saying is that the higher consumption of oil in the DFI engines are mostly due to Cylinder surface treatment vs. DFI (as Ross is arguing)?
Yes, of course operating any engine at higher rpms is going to increase oil usage while doing that too. Theoretically a higher compression ratio could cause an increase in oil consmption but the increase in the ratio is not that much. Also, if the higher compression ratio ( and higher cylinder pressures) was a significant factor then the turbos should use even more oil as cylinder pressures are even greater.

My twin turbo BMW 535 (DI) needed 1 quart at 7000 miles and one quart at about 30,000 miles. The oil is changed at about every 16,000 miles). It has cast iron cylinder liners and was broken in by the book. This car has "normal" oil consumption. My 2008 C2S has only about 3000 miles. It was broken in by the book, the level went down one bar at 500 miles and oanother bar at 1500 miles. I consider this a "normal" progression and I expect that my car will cosume oil at about 1 quart every 5000 or more miles. Now, I know some folks properly breakin their cars and still have high oil consumption rates and this is perhaps a "luck of the draw". But, the heavy oil consumption rates reported in these forums seems to point to something else. By the way my BMW has soot in the tailpipe and my 911 does have a little. This may have nothing to do with the oil but with the combustion process ( like Diesels).


Quick Reply: DFI engines oil consumption



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:31 PM.