Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Will the 997's depreciate as badly as the 996?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2013, 07:22 PM
  #136  
Mark Harris
Rennlist Member
 
Mark Harris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fishdoc
Mark those are great numbers comparisons on topic at hand. But let me ask and I believe your answer is sincere..... Which Porsche do you like driving the best?
Fishdoc,

Awesome question. And with all sincerity it's almost impossible to answer. I had a 997.1 6 speed prior to my .2 PDK. If you had ask me at that time I would have said the 993. When I went PDK that mind set changed.

The PDK vs 6 speed manual has been debated to death and is emotional. Not even going there....but for me when I test drove a PDK in Sport Plus it was all over for the 997.1.

I am extremely fortunate to be able to flip flop back and forth because they couldn't be more different. On a spring or fall PCA run it's the 993 no question. On a July afternoon on my 45 min drive to the airport it's the 997 with cold air conditioning blowing all the way.

If my world closed in on me and I had to dump one it would probably be the 997 simply because I don't want to be the guy who "had" a 993 when they hit $100K in 10 years.
Old 06-28-2013, 08:03 PM
  #137  
rodsky
Rennlist Member
 
rodsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Los Angeles & Truckee, CA
Posts: 3,906
Received 796 Likes on 546 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Harris


+993 or uh..make that +997.2.

1997-6,187 units and 2009-6,839 units. Guess I will keep both of mine.

Amazingly close numbers as you point out.
Very interesting. Also interesting how 911 sales are so much down. They sold far more 996s (in a year) than the 997.2. Obviously the economy has a lot to do with that . Hey they are getting more exclusive at least!
Old 06-28-2013, 08:07 PM
  #138  
rodsky
Rennlist Member
 
rodsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Los Angeles & Truckee, CA
Posts: 3,906
Received 796 Likes on 546 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Harris
Fishdoc,

Awesome question. And with all sincerity it's almost impossible to answer. I had a 997.1 6 speed prior to my .2 PDK. If you had ask me at that time I would have said the 993. When I went PDK that mind set changed.

The PDK vs 6 speed manual has been debated to death and is emotional. Not even going there....but for me when I test drove a PDK in Sport Plus it was all over for the 997.1.

I am extremely fortunate to be able to flip flop back and forth because they couldn't be more different. On a spring or fall PCA run it's the 993 no question. On a July afternoon on my 45 min drive to the airport it's the 997 with cold air conditioning blowing all the way.

If my world closed in on me and I had to dump one it would probably be the 997 simply because I don't want to be the guy who "had" a 993 when they hit $100K in 10 years.
I think the only 993s that will have a chance to hit 100k are the wide bodies due to rarity. I see you have one although I still wouldn't keep any "modern" car as an investment. There are exceptions of course (McLaren F1 etc.). But generally cars that are mass produced are ****ty investments.
Old 06-28-2013, 11:26 PM
  #139  
FlatSix911
Nordschleife Master
 
FlatSix911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 5,308
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Harris

+993 or uh..make that +997.2. 1997-6,187 units and 2009-6,839 units. Guess I will keep both of mine.
Amazingly close numbers as you point out. Comparatively speaking 30,928 - 997.1's and 18,592
- 997.2's is a whopping 49,250 997's.

Compare that to 24,041 993's.
Mark, your observation is spot on.
The number of 997's is 205% of the number of 993's in the USA.
My money is on the 993 for the long term
Old 06-29-2013, 10:55 PM
  #140  
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Edgy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 17,699
Received 229 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jumper5836
I don't belive that. 996.2 vs 997.1 are basically a face lift but added with extra weight and gadgets. Both engines are terrible.
Think what you wish, but there was substantial reengineering that went into the 997. It's about 40% stiffer than a 996, and has an entirely new, revised suspension system. (The older 996 suspensions were incapable of handling the 19 inch wheels, for example.) There is nothing wrong with the M97 engine. Go back a few years to the days of the chain tensioner or the exploding CIS airboxes and tell me about terrible engines. All engines have a minor issue in them somewhere, and subsequent engineering usually fixes those issues. In time, we will discover a new liability in the 991 engines.
Old 06-30-2013, 11:45 AM
  #141  
fbfisher
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
fbfisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rodsky
I think the only 993s that will have a chance to hit 100k are the wide bodies due to rarity.
I guess the GTS has a chance in 30 years.
Old 07-01-2013, 01:39 PM
  #142  
perfectlap
Race Director
 
perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 16,265
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

one (993 v.s 997.2) is not a good replacement for other. The 997.2 is a car you can drive the wheels off, as much as you like, rain or dry, no fear of routine costly engine work. The 993 is a nice car for the garage to take out for ice cream cones. The average owner won't risk totaling it in weather that isn't perfect and DE/autox becomes a non-starter to most purchasers who obssess over the lost value claimed by the odometer. The result is a Porsche owner becoming more like a Ferrari owner.... aka Ferris Beuller's best friend's dad.
Old 07-04-2013, 11:28 AM
  #143  
sebis
Racer
 
sebis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question

This is a cross post from the 996tt forum:

I am considering buying a 911 as weekend toy car, I set my budget at around 45k. Question for the members, considering I drive it ~4,000 miles per year for 5 years, what will take a bigger hit in depreciation, a 996tt or a 997.1, all other things being equal (condition, miles, etc.)

I know you are supposed to drive it and enjoy it but life changes and I would like to know what to expect.

TIA

--Sebis
Old 07-04-2013, 12:41 PM
  #144  
Mark Harris
Rennlist Member
 
Mark Harris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by perfectlap
The 997.2 is a car you can drive the wheels off, as much as you like, rain or dry, no fear of routine costly engine work. The 993 is a nice car for the garage to take out for ice cream cones. The average owner won't risk totaling it in weather that isn't perfect and DE/autox becomes a non-starter to most purchasers who obssess over the lost value claimed by the odometer.
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...ferrerid=46294



Quick Reply: Will the 997's depreciate as badly as the 996?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:34 AM.