Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Porsche Factory Engine Testing Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2009, 02:08 AM
  #31  
OCBen
Banned
 
OCBen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Back in the OC
Posts: 15,022
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclejosh
This system was developed using mathematical modeling and statistical analysis of the entire engine building process from initial parts picking from the bins to final motor assembly. Empirical results and testing are consistent with the modeling, thus it was found unnecessary to dyno and test each motor.
The systems saves Porsche a significant amount of time and money.
Porsche borrowed these statistical methods from the Japanese who in turn learned them from the American, Deming, who taught the Japanese SPC (statistical process control) which allows for periodic sampling of product to ensure conformance to quality standards of deviation, which eliminates the need for 100% testing. Statistical methods in manufacturing have been refined over time with the current goal of zero defects as embraced by the Six Sigma philosophy of quality control, though it still boils down to the statistical mean and the standard deviation of a process which Deming helped pioneer.

Originally Posted by unclejosh
...I can share that the 911s are still largely hand built, or screwed together...
You say that like it's a virtue for a car to be put together the old fashioned way -- mainly by hand.

The fact is, the opposite is true: the more automated the assembly process, the higher the quality of the final product, as borne out by statistics. It's been long known that humans make poor quality assemblers when working on an assembly line repeating the same monotonous task time after time -- human errors are inevitable. Not so with machines. But human labor is cheap compared to the high capital investment cost of sophisticated robotic machinery.

It's no stretch to assume that Porsche, with the huge profits it was earning, invested heavily in automated processes to take out the human factor where you don't want it, and leave it in where you do. If you saw the NatGeo documentary on the Chevrolet assembly for the Z-06 you'd see more hands on the assembly line putting that car together than was seen for the 911. So one can logically draw the conclusion that the quality of an assembled Chevrolet suffers because of the number of "hand built" assembly operations it undergoes.

The ultimate goal of modern manufacturing is to eliminate the human factor -- the assembly laborer -- and do it all by tireless, precision machines. Just try getting the powerful labor unions to sign off on that idea.
Old 10-30-2009, 02:17 AM
  #32  
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Edgy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 17,699
Received 235 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Ben--thanks for summing this thread up nicely. It's funny how little America appreciated W. Edwards Deming. It took the Japanese to do this.



Quick Reply: Porsche Factory Engine Testing Questions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:14 PM.